Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Cherya Metriska
Program Studi Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP KOMPETENSI PENGADILAN HUBUNGAN INDUSTRIAL DALAM MEMERIKSA SENGKETA PERJANJIAN KEMITRAAN Cherya Metriska; Yogo Pamungkas
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 3 No. 2 (2021): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (121.181 KB) | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v3i2.13450

Abstract

The definition of absolute competence is regarding to power between judicial bodies, seen from the type of court, and regarding the granting of power to adjudicate. The research’s main problems are whether the Central Jakarta Industrial Relations Court has the authority to examine and decide disputes between Wandi Irawan, et al., Against PT Tubagus Jaya Mandiri and whether the decision of Industrial Relations Court in the dispute between Wandi Irawan, et al and PT Tubagus Jaya Mandiri complies with Law Number 2 of 2004? This research is a normative and descriptive analytical legal research by using secondary data and the conclusions are drawn by using deductive logic methods. The conclusions are that the Industrial Relations Court at the District Court in the first degree had been decided with a N.O Decision or an unacceptable decision, because it is clear that when it comes to a claim containing or violating absolute competence, the claim is said to be unacceptable, not rejected decison so that the plaintiff should have re-submitted the lawsuit to District Court in the legal area where the defendant lives, not to Industrial Relations Court because it is not an institution that has the authority to adjudicate.
ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP KOMPETENSI PENGADILAN HUBUNGAN INDUSTRIAL DALAM MEMERIKSA SENGKETA PERJANJIAN KEMITRAAN Cherya Metriska; Yogo Pamungkas
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 3 No 2 (2021): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v3i2.13450

Abstract

The definition of absolute competence is regarding to power between judicial bodies, seen from the type of court, and regarding the granting of power to adjudicate. The research’s main problems are whether the Central Jakarta Industrial Relations Court has the authority to examine and decide disputes between Wandi Irawan, et al., Against PT Tubagus Jaya Mandiri and whether the decision of Industrial Relations Court in the dispute between Wandi Irawan, et al and PT Tubagus Jaya Mandiri complies with Law Number 2 of 2004? This research is a normative and descriptive analytical legal research by using secondary data and the conclusions are drawn by using deductive logic methods. The conclusions are that the Industrial Relations Court at the District Court in the first degree had been decided with a N.O Decision or an unacceptable decision, because it is clear that when it comes to a claim containing or violating absolute competence, the claim is said to be unacceptable, not rejected decison so that the plaintiff should have re-submitted the lawsuit to District Court in the legal area where the defendant lives, not to Industrial Relations Court because it is not an institution that has the authority to adjudicate.
Co-Authors Yogo Pamungkas