Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Shafa Bakadam
Program Studi Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
TERDAFTARNYA KATA UMUM "AJAIB" SEBAGAI MEREK PADA DAFTAR UMUM MEREK Shafa Bakadam; Rr. Aline Gratika Nugrahani
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 3 No. 4 (2021): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (294.696 KB) | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v4i2.13621

Abstract

In the Intellectual Property Database, four words "Magic" were found which were used as trademarks with registered status. Article 20 letter f of Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Marks and Geographical Indications states that a mark cannot be registered if it is a public name and/or a symbol of public property. The main problem is whether the word Magic is not included in the category of common words so that its registration is accepted and what are the legal consequences for the acceptance of registration of common words as a mark and what legal remedies can be taken based on Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Marks and Geographical Indications. The research was conducted using normative legal research methods, with secondary data supported by primary data. The nature of the research is descriptive and conclusions are drawn using the deductive method. Based on the research results, the word Magic is a general word, so registration as a trademark cannot be accepted.
TERDAFTARNYA KATA UMUM "AJAIB" SEBAGAI MEREK PADA DAFTAR UMUM MEREK Shafa Bakadam; Rr. Aline Gratika Nugrahani
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 3 No 4 (2021): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v4i2.13621

Abstract

In the Intellectual Property Database, four words "Magic" were found which were used as trademarks with registered status. Article 20 letter f of Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Marks and Geographical Indications states that a mark cannot be registered if it is a public name and/or a symbol of public property. The main problem is whether the word Magic is not included in the category of common words so that its registration is accepted and what are the legal consequences for the acceptance of registration of common words as a mark and what legal remedies can be taken based on Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Marks and Geographical Indications. The research was conducted using normative legal research methods, with secondary data supported by primary data. The nature of the research is descriptive and conclusions are drawn using the deductive method. Based on the research results, the word Magic is a general word, so registration as a trademark cannot be accepted.
Co-Authors RR. Aline Gratika Nugrahani