Metty Soletri
Program Studi Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

TINJAUAN YURIDIS PEMANFAATAN RUANG BERDASARKAN PERATURAN GUBERNUR NOMOR 108 TAHUN 2008 Salsabilla Reypianisha Mukhtar; Metty Soletri
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 4 No. 2 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (430.172 KB) | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v4i4.14110

Abstract

The Governor Regulation Number 108 of 2008 is violated since there is insufficient oversight and control over how space is used. Problem formulation: How is the DKI Jakarta Governor Regulation No. 108 of 2008 implemented within the framework of Law Number 26 of 2007 pertaining to Spatial Planning Law, and how is the Incompatibility of Space Utilization by PT Betaconcrete Mixerindo (Betamix) used to carry out activities Concrete Batching Plant in Governor Regulation No. 108 of 2008 used to carry out activities? The research approach, judicial normative with the nature of descriptive analytical research, uses primary data, such as field research and respondent interviews, in addition to secondary data for literature analyses. Deductively inferred conclusions from qualitative analysis Deductive reasoning was used to qualitatively assess and draw conclusions. In order to maintain harmony and integration between the center and the regions, the research, discussion, and conclusion suggest that the Central Government delegate authority to the Provincial DPRD to create regional regulations. They also recommend applying the Lex Specialist Derogat Legi Generali Principle to prevent conflicts between general laws and special laws. According to current laws, PT Betaconcrete Mixerindo executes space utilization or Concrete Batching Plant activities without the necessary permits.
- AKTA JUAL BELI YANG DIBUAT OLEH PPATS BERKAITAN DENGAN PROSES PENDAFTARAN TANAH (STUDI KASUS PPATS KECAMATAN BATUJAYA KABUPATEN KARAWANG): - Astrid Utari Kemala; Metty Soletri
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v5i3.16486

Abstract

According to the mandate of the UUPA, which is mentioned in Article 19 paragraph (1) of Law No. 5/1960 Jo. and Article 3 letter an of PP 24/1997, the goal of land registration is to ensure legal certainty. In this instance, the role of PPAT is one of the institutions that promotes the attainment of the objective of land registration. But in practice, many continue to employ PPATS services in place of PPAT. Problem statement: Does the PPATS play the same role with PPAT ? How about the legal status of sales purchase deed made by PPATS to land certified. A normative-juridical research methodology was used, with the nature of qualitative research, literature study and the primary data is interviewed. Data analysis is done by qualitative methods with use interview data result. The conclusion is carried out by the deductive method. The research results, discussion and conclusion that act of transfer land rights need land registration to obtain legal certainty. Legal consequences if land obtained through buying and selling but not immediately registered is not meeting the clear legality. The transfer of land rights carried out by PPATS is not continued until the process of tittle transfer document.
KEABSAHAN AKTA HIBAH NO. 513/2018 YANG DIBUAT OLEH PPAT SRI SUSILOWATI S.H BERDASARKN KETENTUAN HUKUM TANAH NASIONAL (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 1/PDT.G/2019/PN.SGI): Validity of Grant Deed No. 513/2018 Made By PPAT Sri Susilowati S.H Based on National Land Law (Study Of Judgement Number 1/Pdt.G/2019/PN.Sgi) Salsabillah Galuh A; Metty Soletri
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Cancellation of the grant deed by the court as has occurred in the case in Sigli City in case Number 1/Pdt.G/2019/PN.Sgi. where Anita Binti Admi unlawfully granted disputed land to her son Harith Hasanuddin, even though the land based on AJB No: 521/x/PPAT/1998 had been purchased by the late Teuku Zainal from Anita and then by Teuku Zainal it was granted to Cut Aida. Without Cut Aida's knowledge, the land had been registered by Anita for submission of a Certificate based on the Deed of Grant issued by PPAT Sri Susilowati SH, meaning that PPAT Sri Susilowati deliberately abused her authority by issuing a Deed of Grant with Number: 513/218 for an object that did not actually belong to the Anita Bint Admi. The main issues raised are 1.) Legitimacy of the Deed of Grant No. 513/2018 made by PPAT Sri Susilowati S.H Based on National Land Law Provisions, 2.) Appropriateness of Judges' Considerations in Decision number 1Pdt.G/2019/PN, Sgi Based on National Land Law provisions. The type of research used is normative research with the nature of descriptive research to obtain secondary data. Besides that, the writer conducted a literature study. The data were analyzed qualitatively and conclusions were drawn using deductive logic. Deed of grant No. 513/2018L made by the Land Deed Making Officer Sri Susilowati SH is invalid because the material requirements for the transfer of land rights are not fulfilled.
TINJAUAN YURIDIS PEMANFAATAN RUANG BERDASARKAN PERATURAN GUBERNUR NOMOR 108 TAHUN 2008 Salsabilla Reypianisha Mukhtar; Metty Soletri
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 4 No 2 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v4i4.14110

Abstract

The Governor Regulation Number 108 of 2008 is violated since there is insufficient oversight and control over how space is used. Problem formulation: How is the DKI Jakarta Governor Regulation No. 108 of 2008 implemented within the framework of Law Number 26 of 2007 pertaining to Spatial Planning Law, and how is the Incompatibility of Space Utilization by PT Betaconcrete Mixerindo (Betamix) used to carry out activities Concrete Batching Plant in Governor Regulation No. 108 of 2008 used to carry out activities? The research approach, judicial normative with the nature of descriptive analytical research, uses primary data, such as field research and respondent interviews, in addition to secondary data for literature analyses. Deductively inferred conclusions from qualitative analysis Deductive reasoning was used to qualitatively assess and draw conclusions. In order to maintain harmony and integration between the center and the regions, the research, discussion, and conclusion suggest that the Central Government delegate authority to the Provincial DPRD to create regional regulations. They also recommend applying the Lex Specialist Derogat Legi Generali Principle to prevent conflicts between general laws and special laws. According to current laws, PT Betaconcrete Mixerindo executes space utilization or Concrete Batching Plant activities without the necessary permits.
- AKTA JUAL BELI YANG DIBUAT OLEH PPATS BERKAITAN DENGAN PROSES PENDAFTARAN TANAH (STUDI KASUS PPATS KECAMATAN BATUJAYA KABUPATEN KARAWANG): - Astrid Utari Kemala; Metty Soletri
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 5 No 3 (2023): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v5i3.16486

Abstract

According to the mandate of the UUPA, which is mentioned in Article 19 paragraph (1) of Law No. 5/1960 Jo. and Article 3 letter an of PP 24/1997, the goal of land registration is to ensure legal certainty. In this instance, the role of PPAT is one of the institutions that promotes the attainment of the objective of land registration. But in practice, many continue to employ PPATS services in place of PPAT. Problem statement: Does the PPATS play the same role with PPAT ? How about the legal status of sales purchase deed made by PPATS to land certified. A normative-juridical research methodology was used, with the nature of qualitative research, literature study and the primary data is interviewed. Data analysis is done by qualitative methods with use interview data result. The conclusion is carried out by the deductive method. The research results, discussion and conclusion that act of transfer land rights need land registration to obtain legal certainty. Legal consequences if land obtained through buying and selling but not immediately registered is not meeting the clear legality. The transfer of land rights carried out by PPATS is not continued until the process of tittle transfer document.
EKSEKUSI HAK TANGGUNGAN TERDAHAP HAK ATAS TANAH SEBAGAI AKIBAT WANPRESTASI PERJANJIAN KREDIT MODAL KERJA (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 3569/K/Pdt/2016): Execution Of Mortgage Rights Regarding Land Rights As Defect Of Working Capital Credit Agreements (Study Decision Number 3569/K/Pdt/2016) Okmeydianti Annur Purwanto; Metty Soletri
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 6 No 1 (2024): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v6i1.19305

Abstract

Fulfillment of the rights and obligations of the parties in contractual law is guaranteed by law.  In this case, to see what is the right of each party, this is because the debtor is an obligation for the creditor and vice versa.  The formulation of the problem that will be discussed in this article is the procedure for executing mortgage rights carried out in Decision Number 3569/K/Pdt/2016 and its conformity with statutory regulations.  The research method used is normative legal research which is descriptive analytical in nature and the data used is primary and secondary data.  The results of the research and discussion refer to the suitability of the execution of mortgage rights carried out in Decision Number 3569/K/Pdt/2016 with Law Number 4 of 1996 concerning Mortgage Rights.  The conclusion in this article is that the execution of mortgage rights can be carried out through parate execution, executorial title, and private sale and the execution of mortgage rights carried out in Decision Number 3569/K/Pdt/2016 is in accordance with Law Number 4 of 1996 concerning Mortgage Rights.