Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Amicus Curiae
Ferry Edward
Program Studi Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
ORGANISASI PAPUA MERDEKA SEBAGAI ORGANISASI TERORIS BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NO 5 TAHUN 2018 Nafa Afrillia; Ferry Edward
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 5 No. 2 (2023): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v5i2.15038

Abstract

The Free Papua group (OPM) was declared a terrorist group in accordance with Law Number 5 of 2018. OPM, on the other hand, is seen as a group of freedom fighters. Problem formulation: Is the Free Papua group (OPM) determined to be a terrorist group in accordance with Law No. 5 of 2018 and what are the legal repercussions of the Free Papua Organization (OPM)'s creation as a terrorist organization? The research method used is normative legal research and is analytically descriptive in nature, the data is processed qualitatively and conclusions are drawn using deductive logic. As for the research results, discussion and conclusions in the study; based on Article 1 number (3) in conjunction with Article 6 of Law no. 5 of 2018 concerning the Eradication of Acts of Terrorism, the government's designation of OPM as a terrorist organization is in accordance with applicable regulations. The legal consequences of the designation of OPM as a terrorist organization, the act of terrorism is a Criminal Act of Terrorism as stipulated in Article 5 of Law Number 5 of 2018.
PENGELOLAAN KEUANGAN NEGARA HASIL TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 17 TAHUN 2003 TENTANG KEUANGAN NEGARA (STUDI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG 29/PID.SUS-TPK/2021/PN.JKT PST): Management of State Financial Proceeds of Corruption Crime based on Law Number 17 of 2003 Concerning State Finance State ( Study of Supreme Court Decision 29/Pid.Sus-TPK/2021/PN.Jkt. Pst) Devica Alivia Marzani; Ferry Edward
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v1i1.19591

Abstract

In the Supreme Court decision 29/Pid.Sus-TPK/2021/PN.Jkt.Pst the panel of judges decided that Juliari Peter Batubara must pay state compensation money. The main issues raised by the author 1) What is the process for managing returns to state finances resulting from criminal acts of corruption (Study of Supreme Court Decision 29/Pid.Sus-TPK/2021/PN.Jkt.Pst), to the state according to the applicable laws and regulations? 2) Are there any obstacles in the process of recovering state financial losses from corruption? This study uses a normative research type that is descriptive-analytical. Data collection uses primary data and secondary data. The data is processed qualitatively by drawing conclusions using a deductive method. The results of the research show that the process of managing state financial losses carried out by the defendant Juliari Peter Batubara refers to the Attorney General's Office Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 19 of 2020 concerning Settlement of Compensation Money Decided by Courts and Regulation of the Minister of Finance Number 225 of 2020 concerning the Electronic State Revenue System . In the process of returning state financial losses resulting from the corruption crime of Juliari Peter Batubara there were no obstacles because the convict was able to and had compensated for the state losses arising from the proceeds of the corruption crime.
ORGANISASI PAPUA MERDEKA SEBAGAI ORGANISASI TERORIS BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NO 5 TAHUN 2018 Nafa Afrillia; Ferry Edward
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 5 No 2 (2023): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v5i2.15038

Abstract

The Free Papua group (OPM) was declared a terrorist group in accordance with Law Number 5 of 2018. OPM, on the other hand, is seen as a group of freedom fighters. Problem formulation: Is the Free Papua group (OPM) determined to be a terrorist group in accordance with Law No. 5 of 2018 and what are the legal repercussions of the Free Papua Organization (OPM)'s creation as a terrorist organization? The research method used is normative legal research and is analytically descriptive in nature, the data is processed qualitatively and conclusions are drawn using deductive logic. As for the research results, discussion and conclusions in the study; based on Article 1 number (3) in conjunction with Article 6 of Law no. 5 of 2018 concerning the Eradication of Acts of Terrorism, the government's designation of OPM as a terrorist organization is in accordance with applicable regulations. The legal consequences of the designation of OPM as a terrorist organization, the act of terrorism is a Criminal Act of Terrorism as stipulated in Article 5 of Law Number 5 of 2018.
Co-Authors Devica Alivia Marzani Nafa Afrillia