Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Ronaldo
Program Studi Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
TINJAUAN YURIDIS TINDAK PIDANA PEMBANTUAN PENCURIAN DENGAN PEMBERATAN (PUTUSAN NOMOR 241/PID.B/2021/PN SBG) Ronaldo; Aprima Suar
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 4 No. 3 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (437.234 KB) | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v4i5.15137

Abstract

There are circumstances or a chronology of cases that are essentially this is a qualification of the elements of Article 363 Paragraph 1, 3 in conjunction with Article 56 of the Criminal Code that regulates the crime of assisting theft with weighting. As a defendant named Ranto Silaban, it has been decided and declared legally and convincingly proven guilty of committing the crime of collection in Article 480 1st of the Criminal Code. Problem statement: In the case study of Decision Number 241/Pid.B/2021/PN Sbg, is there a distinction between stealing by weighting and theft by receiving? Also, how are criminal penalties applied in this instance? The study is normative, descriptive-analytical, employs secondary data sources, qualitatively analyses, and applies the deductive technique to generate conclusions. The difference between stealing and weighting is defined in Article 363 Paragraph 1. Third of the Criminal Code, whereas collection is defined in Article 480. First of the Criminal Code, according to research findings, discussion, and conclusion. The penalty for violating Article 480 1 of the Criminal Code, which deals with receiving the strongest threat, is four years in prison. In this case, defendant Ranto helped commit theft with weighting in order to profit.
TINJAUAN YURIDIS TINDAK PIDANA PEMBANTUAN PENCURIAN DENGAN PEMBERATAN (PUTUSAN NOMOR 241/PID.B/2021/PN SBG) Ronaldo; Aprima Suar
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 4 No 3 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v4i5.15137

Abstract

There are circumstances or a chronology of cases that are essentially this is a qualification of the elements of Article 363 Paragraph 1, 3 in conjunction with Article 56 of the Criminal Code that regulates the crime of assisting theft with weighting. As a defendant named Ranto Silaban, it has been decided and declared legally and convincingly proven guilty of committing the crime of collection in Article 480 1st of the Criminal Code. Problem statement: In the case study of Decision Number 241/Pid.B/2021/PN Sbg, is there a distinction between stealing by weighting and theft by receiving? Also, how are criminal penalties applied in this instance? The study is normative, descriptive-analytical, employs secondary data sources, qualitatively analyses, and applies the deductive technique to generate conclusions. The difference between stealing and weighting is defined in Article 363 Paragraph 1. Third of the Criminal Code, whereas collection is defined in Article 480. First of the Criminal Code, according to research findings, discussion, and conclusion. The penalty for violating Article 480 1 of the Criminal Code, which deals with receiving the strongest threat, is four years in prison. In this case, defendant Ranto helped commit theft with weighting in order to profit.
Co-Authors Aprima Suar