Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Economics, Law, and Humanities
Zainal Faizin
Institut Agama Islam Negeri Ponorogo, Indonesia
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Penerapan Hak Ex Officio Hakim dan Asas Ius Contra Legem dalam Perkara Perceraian dan Pembagian Harta Bersama di Pengadilan Agama Magetan Perspektif Hukum Progresif Zainal Faizin; Ahmad Junaidi
Journal of Economics, Law, and Humanities Vol. 1 No. 1 (2022): Economics, Law, and Humanities
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21154/jelhum.v1i1.535

Abstract

Throughout 2019 the Magetan Religious Court has decided on divorce cases accompanied by the distribution of joint assets in four cases. From the four cases, legal dynamics emerged in their decisions, namely regarding the use of ex officio rights with reference to statutory regulations and the application of the principle of ius contra legem in deciding cases. The focus of the study in this thesis is the application of the ex officio rights of judges and the principle of ius contra legem in the case of sharing assets in the Magetan Religious Court with a progressive legal perspective. The approach used in this research is the progressive legal approach, which studies how the law is applied and whether it is in accordance with the principles of justice that make law for humans. Meanwhile, the theory used is a legal discovery with the characteristics of progressive law. Whereas the use of ex officio rights by applying the principle of ius contra legem solely aims to protect the legal interests of justice seekers by using the spirit of progressive law which is based on the legal interests of justice seekers which must be put forward rather than merely referring to codified rules, however, the judges do not abandon the legal principles which form the basis of the judges' thinking and actions in examining, hearing and deciding cases.
Co-Authors Ahmad Junaidi