R. Maula Rifada
Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Padjadjaran University, Bandung

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

COMPARISON OF SITA STANDARD 24-2 WITH SITA FASTER 24-2C PROGRAM ON HUMPHREY FIELD ANALYZER IN ASSESSING VISUAL FIELD DEFECTS OF GLAUCOMA PATIENTS Nuzul Rianti; Karmelita Satari; Andika Prahasta; R. Maula Rifada; Sonie Umbara
Majalah Oftalmologi Indonesia Vol 49 No S1 (2023): Supplement Edition
Publisher : The Indonesian Ophthalmologists Association (IOA, Perhimpunan Dokter Spesialis Mata Indonesia (Perdami))

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35749/a4syph39

Abstract

Introduction: Periodical perimetry examination to detect and determine the rate of glaucoma progression continues to be a challenging task, because it depends on many factors. Besides, there is now a paradigm shift which central visual field defects occur earlier. SITA Standard (SS) 24-2 is the clinical standard for glaucoma examination, but there were studies reporting on the prevalence of central visual field defects not detected. SITA Faster (SFR) 24-2C was developed to address current shortcomings, but the performance has yet to be formally and independently assessed. Objective: To compare the global indices (Mean Deviation, Pattern Standard Deviation, Visual Field Index) and test duration between SS 24-2 and SFR 24-2C program. Methods: This is an analytical observational study with a cross-sectional design. Subjects aged >18 years who diagnosed with glaucoma and whose visual fields unaffected by other condition besides glaucoma were included. All subjects underwent testing of both programs. Results: This study was conducted in 94 eyes of 66 patients. Comparison of global indices and test duration between the two programs was carried out by the Wilcoxon test. The mean results of MD and PSD global indices were not significantly different, however there was a difference in the mean VFI of 1.5% between the two programs. The test duration of SFR 24-2C was 55.03% faster. Conclusion: There was no significant difference in the MD and PSD global indices, but there was a significant difference in the VFI, as well as the test duration between the two programs.