<![CDATA[Numerous high-rise buildings have been built in major cities in Indonesia. In high seismicity areas, such as Surabaya, the seismic behavior of structures is notably affected by the seismic characteristics of the subsurface soils. Typically, site-specific response analysis (SSRA) is conducted to determine the peak ground acceleration experienced at the ground surface. This paper compares one-dimensional site response analysis on deep soft clay deposits in Surabaya city using two commonly used 1D site response programs: DEEPSOIL and NERA (Non-linear Earthquake Site Response Analyse). A soil column model with 24 m thick very soft clay was developed. To represent different ground motion intensity, three levels of input motion were applied at the bedrock with peak ground accelerations (PGA) of 0.07g, 0.3g, and 0.51g. These input motions were then applied in a one-dimensional non-linear site response analysis to evaluate the seismic soil response at the surface. The evaluation involves examining the peak ground acceleration (PGA) and maximum shear strain profiles obtained from both software programs. The results indicate that the non-linear analysis conducted with NERA yielded greater amplification factors across all periods compared to the results obtained from DEEPSOIL. For the low-intensity motion, both software showed amplification of the input motion for all periods. In contrast, the spectral response obtained with DEEPSOIL demonstrated de-amplification trends for periods less than 1 s for the case of medium and high-intensity motions, whereas no de-amplification was observed from the results of NERA. This difference results in the amplification for medium and high-intensity motions can be attributed to the strength correction factors that are implemented in the DEEPSOIL software to take into account the representative shear strength of the soil layers.]]>
