Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

FAKTOR-FAKTOR PENYEBAB TINGGINYA CERAI GUGAT DI KABUPATEN SINTANG Indah Lestari; Marluwi Marluwi; Nanda Himmatul Ulya
Al-Usroh Vol 3 No 2 (2023): Hukum Keluarga Islam
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Pontianak

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24260/al-usroh.v3i2.952

Abstract

The aims of this study are: 1) To find out the factors that cause the high rate of divorce in the Sintang Religious Court; 2) To find out the stages of handling a lawsuit for divorce in the Sintang Religious Court. This research uses qualitative methods, while the type of research used is empirical research that uses data in the field as the main data source. The data sources of this study used primary data sources, namely in the form of interviews with judges and clerks of the Sintang Religious Court whose subjects had been determined, then secondary data sources, namely from books, documents, journals and other data sources that could complement this research. The technique used in this research data collection is observation, interviews and documentation. The data collection techniques in this study were using interview guidelines, observation guidelines and smart phones. And the researcher's data analysis technique used data reduction, data exposure and drawing conclusions. Furthermore, the data validity technique is using triangulation techniques between data sources. Based on the analysis conducted by the researchers, it can be concluded that: 1) The factors that cause the high level of divorce in the Sintang Religious Court are due to continuous disputes and quarrels, leaving one party, economy, apostasy, domestic violence (domestic violence), gambling, drunk, sentenced to prison, disabled and forced marriage. However, among the factors above, the most dominant in the Sintang Religious Court is due to continuous disputes and quarrels between husbands. 2) The following are the stages of handling the divorce petition at the Sintang Religious Court, namely: reconciliation efforts, reading of the plaintiff's lawsuit, the defendant's answer, the defendant's reply, the defendant's duplicate, proof, the conclusions of the parties, the panel of judges' deliberation and the judge's decision.
PROBLEMATIKA JURU SITA DALAM MELAKSANAKAN TUGAS DI PENGADILAN AGAMA NANGA PINOH Sofian Sofian; Marluwi Marluwi; Nanda Himmatul Ulya
Al-Usroh Vol 3 No 2 (2023): Hukum Keluarga Islam
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Pontianak

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24260/al-usroh.v3i2.954

Abstract

The objectives of this study are: 1) To find out the problems of the bailiff at the Nanga Pinoh Religious Court in carrying out their duties. 2) To find out whether the bailiff at the Nanga Pinoh Religious Court has carried out his duties in accordance with Law Number 50 of 2009 concerning the second amendment to Law Number 7 of 1989 concerning Religious Courts. The results of the study can be concluded as follows: 1) The problems of the bailiff at the Nanga Pinoh Religious Court in carrying out their duties, namely the infrastructure that is less supportive, because there are villages that do not have road access for motorbikes to pass, during the rainy season natural disasters such as floods and landslides, the names of the parties are different between the nicknames and the names on the ID cards, making it difficult for the bailiff to find the litigants and in divorce cases the address of one of the parties is difficult to find. 2) The bailiff at the Nanga Pinoh Religious Court is only in charge of summoning the litigants. The bailiff at the Nanga Pinoh Religious Court has also carried out his duties in accordance with Law No. 50 of 2009 concerning the Second Amendment to Law No. 7 of 1989 concerning the Religious Courts, judging by the number of cases at the Nanga Pinoh Religious Court in 2021 which have completed 1 cases of polygamy permits, 39 cases of divorce divorce, 119 cases of litigation, 2 cases of joint property, 1 case of child control, 5 cases of guardianship, 18 cases of marriage legality, 87 cases of dispensation for marriage, 11 cases of guardian adhol and 2 cases of determining heirs. where the bailiff has a very important role in resolving the case.