Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS)

RESOLUTION OF CONSUMER DISPUTES THROUGH ARBITRATION BASED ON RULING NUMBER 038/ARBITRASE/2022/BPSK.MDN Abdul Rahman Maulana Siregar; Rico Nur Ilham; Sardi; Sri Devi Zebua
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024): January
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v4i1.1339

Abstract

Dispute problems often occur in the community and become legal problems and problems that need to be discussed from a juridical aspect, in order to find out the basis for a problem that arises due to indications that arise from misunderstanding, tolerance in the problem, resulting in confusion and the emergence of a problem. which was ultimately resolved through litigation and non-litigation efforts. Specifically regarding the discussion of dispute resolution efforts through non-litigation, in this case using the arbitration settlement method requires a resolution of consumer disputes through arbitration. The law provides an alternative way by providing non-litigation or out-of-court dispute resolution in the form of conciliation, mediation and arbitration. As part of alternative dispute resolution, consumer dispute resolution is resolved through the Consumer ispute Resolution Agency (BPSK) as in dispute Number 038/Arbitrase/2022/BPSK.Mdn. BPSK is an alternative solution in resolving consumer disputes regarding problems in society, although it does not escape peace efforts or legal resolution in judicial procedures.
JURIDICAL STUDY OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE MEASURES TO RESOLVE STATE ADMINISTRATIVE DISPUTES Bambang Harianto; Abdul Rahman Maulana Siregar; Fauzan
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 4 No. 3 (2024): May
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v4i3.1595

Abstract

The implementation of the Regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia (PERMA) Number: 6 of 2018, dated 4 December 2018 concerning Guidelines for Settlement of Government Administrative Disputes after taking administrative measures, which is a further regulation of the provisions in Articles 75, 76 and Article 77 of Law Number 30 of the Year 2014 concerning Government Administration, bringing changes to the State Administrative Justice system in Indonesia, namely related to Administrative Efforts. This then gives rise to several problems, namely first, whether administrative measures are an obligation that must be taken first before filing a state administrative dispute lawsuit with the State Administrative Court (PTUN); secondly, what is the procedure for making objections to State Civil Service (ASN) employment disputes? The aim of this research is to analyze and describe the application of administrative efforts to state administration disputes. Normative juridical research methods are used to answer this problem. The results of the research show that administrative efforts must be carried out as legal protection for the people in State Administration disputes, and the legal procedure is to carry out objection efforts in ASN disputes as regulated in Article 129 of Law Number 5 of 2014 concerning State Civil Apparatus, and the Judge will reject the party If the plaintiff has not taken the available administrative measures.