Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
1.126
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Meta-Yuridis LEGAL BRIEF International Journal of Business, Law, and Education Sibatik Journal : Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Sosial, Ekonomi, Budaya, Teknologi, Dan Pendidikan IBLAM Law Review LAWPASS
Adawiyah, Rodiatun
Unknown Affiliation
Arts Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Neuroscience Social Sciences Other

Published : 7 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 7 Documents
Search

 1 
ANALISIS YURIDIS PUTUSAN NOMOR 1082 K/PDT.SUS-HKI/2022 TENTANG SENGKETA MEREK YANG MEMILIKI PERSAMAAN PADA MEREK MASTERTINT Adawiyah, Rodiatun; Roymond Eygia, Migel; Arta Yanda Rajagukguk, Wisnu
SIBATIK JOURNAL: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Sosial, Ekonomi, Budaya, Teknologi, Dan Pendidikan Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023): December
Publisher : Penerbit Lafadz Jaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/sibatik.v3i1.1779

Abstract

Brand disputes between the well-known brand "MASTERTINT" and the plaintiff receive legal protection. Legal protection for trademarks is regulated in trademark law number 20 of 2016. Proving the element of similarity in essence or in its entirety is the starting point for the panel of judges' consideration in trademark cases between MASTERTINT which is under COATINGS FOREIGN IP Co. LLC and brands come first. suing Soetrisno's MasterTint brand to the Supreme Court was deemed to have similar elements in essence or in its entirety. This research is a normative legal research method using a case approach which aims to find the legal basis, understanding and rules relating to the use of market survey results to show that brands are not used. Brand legal regulations in the new trademark law number 20 of 2016 have attempted to provide legal protection for brand rights holders. The handling of brand rights violations, which can be done in various ways, should be able to provide protection for brand rights holders.
JURIDICAL ANALYSIS OF CHILD AND WIFE NEGLIGENCE IN THE HOUSEHOLD BASED ON SUPREME COURT RULING NO.528K/PID.SUS/2019 Adawiyah, Rodiatun; Prasetyo, Muhammad Arif; Siahaan, Efelyn Theresia; Ginting, Haganta Filemon
Jurnal Meta-Yuridis Vol 7, No 1 (2024)
Publisher : fakultas hukum universitas PGRI Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26877/m-y.v7i1.18312

Abstract

A household consists of a husband and wife and their dependents. There are many cases when family members commit violence against each other. For example, when a husband or father fails to provide for his family, this is considered household neglect. This research uses a Normative Juridical methodology, which utilizes secondary sources such as books, journals and online sources to compile its findings.Criminals who commit acts of domestic neglect against their wives and children can be prosecuted and sentenced to criminal sentences that are not in accordance with the demands of the Public Prosecutor. This is the crux of the problem. The second way to look at this issue is from a legal perspective, when the judge considers the sentence imposed in the case. Supreme Court judges consider the evidence of defendants and witnesses when handing down sentences. Although the author believes that the punishment imposed by this decision is fair, the author also believes that this term does not discourage violators. As the author argues, it is the judge's responsibility to consider the material and mental well-being of the victim
Juridical Analysis of the Comparison of Different Religious Marriage Laws Based on the Adminduk Law Article 35 with SEMA No 2 Years 2023 Concerning Marriage Registration Lumbantoruan, Sahala; Isnainul, Ok; Adawiyah, Rodiatun
International Journal of Business, Law, and Education Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024): International Journal of Business, Law, and Education (ongoing)
Publisher : IJBLE Scientific Publications Community Inc.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56442/ijble.v5i2.764

Abstract

Interfaith marriage is an issue that has not been resolved to date. In current practice in Indonesian society, interfaith marriage processions are generally carried out by carrying out the marriage with a religious procession each of which is followed by the prospective husband and wife or in the sense that there are two religious processes being carried out or only carrying out one religious procession or what generally happens is not carrying out religious processions at all so that it does not comply with Article 2 paragraph (1) of the Marriage Law regarding valid marriages. The legal research method used in this research is normative juridical research which is research carried out or aimed only at written regulations with the nature of descriptive analysis research which is a method that functions to describe or provide an overview of the object being studied. The data source used is secondary data with quantitative data analysis. The results of this research are the Hierarchy of Legislation in Indonesia. If it is related to the Civil Admin Law Article 35 with SEMA Number 2 of 2023, the legal force of SEMA has a lower hierarchy than the law. Therefore, it can be concluded that the provisions contained in the Administer Law cannot be changed by SEMA Number 2 of 2023. However, this SEMA still influences the direction for judges not to grant requests for inter-religious marriages.
Criminal Accountability of Perpetrators of Child Molestation Supreme Court Decision Number 1041/K/Pid.Sus/2020 Arif Prasetyo, Muhammad; Adawiyah, Rodiatun; Ramadhana, Widodo; Gokman Lumbantungkup, Hebri
LAW&PASS: International Journal of Law, Public Administration and Social Studies Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): August
Publisher : PT. Multidisciplinary Press Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The crime of molestation is a form of crime against decency, where criminal acts and criminality can be committed by anyone, whether parents, adults, teenagers and children, either directly or indirectly. However, children are very vulnerable to physical or sexual violence because they are powerless creatures who depend on the people who are present in their lives to be able to keep them alive in the world safely. The purpose of this study is to find out how the criminal liability of perpetrators of child molestation and to find out how the legal considerations of judges in handling criminal cases in accordance with the Supreme Court Decision Number 1041 / K / Pid.Sus/2020. The author uses the Normative Legal research method with a Normative Juridical approach. The source of legal material used consists of primary legal material, secondary legal material, and tertiary legal material. In this study, the authors used data collection techniques in the form of literature studies (library search). Data analysis techniques use qualitative data analysis to find out and explore certain phenomena. In this study, the authors examined the Crime of Child Molestation under the age of the defendant Syarifuddin bin Alm, Tayat at the Level of Justice of the Seluma District Prosecutor's Office sentenced the perpetrator to imprisonment, fines and was proven guilty and convincing of the accused crime of molestation based on witness testimony, instructions, evidence, and defendant's statement.
Criminal Responsibility in the Corruption Case of Bumdes Lentong Village, Baharu District, Aceh Singkil Regency: (Analysis of Decision Number 5662 K/Pid.Sus/2022) Enintha Pandia, Eunike; Reiforman Waruwu, Tata; Armaini, Agus; Adawiyah, Rodiatun
LAW&PASS: International Journal of Law, Public Administration and Social Studies Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): August
Publisher : PT. Multidisciplinary Press Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Every act must have the courage to carry out responsibility, the defendant who commits a criminal act of corruption must be given a prison sentence based on Article 2 of Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Corruption Crimes. Decision Number 5662 K/Pid.Sus/2022, concerning the Corruption case committed by 2 (two) village officials from Lentong Village, Baharu District, Aceh Singkil Regency who committed corruption against BUMDes amounting to IDR 332,400,000 (three hundred and thirtytwo million four hundred thousand rupiah). This thesis is entitled: Criminal Responsibility in the Bumdes Corruption Case in Lentong Village, Baharu District, Aceh Singkil Regency (Analysis of Decision Number 5662 K/Pid.Sus/2022). The formulation of the problem is how the law protects defendants of criminal acts of corruption and how the Supreme Court Judge considers it in the case of Decision Number 5662 K/Pid.Sus/2022.
Legal Analysis of Criminal Acts of Corruption of Livestock Budget (Study of Decision No.3038 K/Pid.Sus/2021) Damanik, Stevi Idhel Wheis; prasetyo, Muhammad Arif; Adawiyah, Rodiatun; Ramadhana, Widodo; Sembiring, Josua Pramana Adika
LEGAL BRIEF Vol. 13 No. 4 (2024): Law Science and Field
Publisher : IHSA Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35335/legal.v13i4.1075

Abstract

One of the crimes that is always in the spotlight in Indonesia is the problem of corruption. Corruption is no longer a foreign thing in this country. Indonesian corruption is even classified as an extraordinary crime because it has damaged not only state finances and the country's economic potential, but has also destroyed the pillars of socio-cultural, moral, political and legal security of Indonesia. As happened in the decision Number 3038 K / Pid.Sus / 2021, which stated that there had been a criminal act of corruption in the grant activity budget of the East Java Provincial Animal Husbandry Service in 2016, which was carried out by the Defendant IMAM HANAFI, SE bin MUCHAMAD HABIB. The empirical normative method is the method applied in this research where this method is carried out through research activities on reading materials and directly reviewing the objects being studied. The application of Article 2 Paragraph 1 of the Corruption Eradication Law in Decision Number 3038 K/Pid.Sus/2021 to the Defendant IMAM HANAFI, Se is in accordance with the fact that the defendant is a person assigned by the East Java Provincial Animal Husbandry Service to coordinate 5 Groups that will receive grant funds to buy livestock. That the judge in deciding the case considered that the defendant's actions had fulfilled the elements of a crime in Article 2 paragraph (1) in conjunction with Article 18 of Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption.
TINJAUAN YURIDIS MENGENAI PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA HIBAH TERHADAP ISTRI KEDUA: (Studi kasus putusan PT Bandung NO.31/PDT/2020/PT.BDG) Pakpahan, Elvira Fitriyani; Heriyanti, Heriyanti; Adawiyah, Rodiatun; Yoshinaga, Yoshinaga; Tanjaya, Willy
IBLAM LAW REVIEW Vol. 4 No. 2 (2024): IBLAM LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (LPPM IBLAM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52249/ilr.v4i2.435

Abstract

Salah satu cara untuk menguasai atau memiliki hak atas tanah adalah melalui proses hibah. Dalam hal pemberian hibah tidak boleh dilakukan secara sendiri/dibawah tangan, melainkan pemberian hibah harus dilakukan oleh/dihadapan pejabat yang berwenang dalam hal ini ialah Notaris dan/atau PPAT. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui faktor-faktor yang melatarbelakangi pemberian hibah dan bagaimana status hukum tanah hibah yang disengketakan, alasan hakim dalam memutus perkara, dan akibat hukum mengenai penyelesaian sengketa hibah terhadap istri kedua yang dilakukan dalam putusan PT bandung No.31/PDT/2020/PT.BDG. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis-normatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa faktor yang melatarbelakangi sesorang memberikan hibah kepada penerima hibah ialah faktor usia, faktor penghibah memiliki ahli waris lebih dari satu orang, dan faktor menghindari pajak ataupun tagihan lainya yang mungkin timbul atas aset dari penghibah tersebut. Mengenai status hukum tanah yang telah di hibahkan oleh seorang penghibah terhadap penerima hibah maka secara hak dan kewajiban atas tanah itu telah beralih ke si penerima hibah tersebut seketika itu juga ketika mereka telah bersepakat. Dasar pertimbangan hakim dalam perkara No.31/PDT/2020/PT.BDG adalah surat persil Nomor: 65 tahun 1988 Luas 4000m2 dan akta hibah no.2.414/2017 di hadapan Notaris. Akibat hukumnya adalah gugatan para pembanding/semula para penggugat tidak dapat diterima dan menyatakan bahwasanya akta hibah Nomor 2.414/2017 adalah sah dan berlaku.
Co-Authors Arif Prasetyo, Muhammad Armaini, Agus Arta Yanda Rajagukguk, Wisnu Damanik, Stevi Idhel Wheis Elvira Fitriyani Pakpahan Enintha Pandia, Eunike Ginting, Haganta Filemon Gokman Lumbantungkup, Hebri Heriyanti Heriyanti, Heriyanti Isnainul, OK Lumbantoruan, Sahala Muhammad Arif Prasetyo Ramadhana, Widodo Reiforman Waruwu, Tata Roymond Eygia, Migel Sembiring, Josua Pramana Adika Siahaan, Efelyn Theresia Tanjaya, Willy Yoshinaga, Yoshinaga