Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia Journal of Law, Education and Business
Yunita, Theresia
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Nursing Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Juridical Review of Copyright Infringement Based on Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright (Case Study of Decision Number 338/Pdt.G./2020/PN. Jkt. Pst Year 2022) Syailendra Putra, Moody Rizqy; Yunita, Theresia; Mayvians, Tidelstein
QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia Vol 2, No 2 (2023): December 2023
Publisher : CV. Rayyan Dwi Bharata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57235/qistina.v2i2.823

Abstract

Indonesia is a constitutional state where every action of its people has legal consequences. If you violate certain things, that person may be subject to sanctions under applicable law. One violation that often occurs in society is a violation of someone's copyright. For example using the Mall Grand Indonesia logo on the image/sketch of Almi's welcome monument. In this article, the author analyzes the case of the Selamat Datang Monument which was abandoned by the Alm family. Henk Ngantung for Grand Indonesia who allegedly erected a monument which ended with a damages penalty. Copyright infringement is regulated in the Copyright Law No. 28 of 2014. In this study, the authors conducted normative legal research using a legal approach, case approach and analytical approach.
The Importance of Taxpayer Awareness and Legal Sanctions for All Levels of Indonesian Society Budiman, Eunike Kathryn; Pangestu, Kartika; Yunita, Theresia; Siswanto, Vivienne Olivia
QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia Vol 2, No 2 (2023): December 2023
Publisher : CV. Rayyan Dwi Bharata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57235/qistina.v2i2.902

Abstract

One of the characteristics of a developed country can be seen from the high awareness of its citizens to pay taxes. Taxes are one of the country's largest sources of income, which come from the people and are useful for the welfare of the people's lives. Therefore, awareness to pay taxes is very important. In this case, the state has the authority to collect taxes from its people. Tax revenue received will later be used to increase Indonesia's development starting from the development of infrastructure, education, health and various other sectors that aim for the welfare and prosperity of the Indonesian people. However, judging from the data received and the facts on the ground, unfortunately in Indonesia itself awareness of paying taxes is still very low. Not only that, the state apparatus in charge of taxation still makes a lot of negligence and mistakes. These things hampered the existing taxation system in Indonesia.
Penyelesaian Sengketa Merek Pepsodent Strong dan Formula Strong (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor: 332 K/Pdt.Sus.HKI/2021) Yunita, Theresia
Journal of Law, Education and Business Vol 2, No 1 (2024): April 2024
Publisher : CV. Rayyan Dwi Bharata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57235/jleb.v2i1.1610

Abstract

Merek adalah jati dari dari suatu barang ataupun jasa yang mengacu pada mutu serta harga yang telah ditetapkan oleh pemiliknya. Namun masih banyak terjadi kasus pelanggaran terhadap hak merek seseorang di masyarakat. Penelitian ini akan mengkaji mengenai proses penyelesaian sengketa merek serta putusan hakim dalam sengketa Pepsodent Strong dan Formula Strong. Penelitian ini memakai metode yuridis normatif menurut undang-undang yang berlaku di Indonesia dengan bahan dasar hukum primer yaitu Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis serta bahan hukum sekunder yakni artikel, makalah yang berkaitan dengan merek. Hasil penelitian penyelesaian sengketa merek di Indonesia terdapat 2 metode, yakni litigasi oleh pengadilan niaga dan non litigasi lewat alternatif penyelesaian sengketa. Penyelesaian yang digunakan dalam kasus Hardwood Private Limited dan PT Unilever dilakukan secara Litigasi di Pengadilan Niaga pada Pengadilan Jakarta Pusat dan berlanjut hingga tahap kasasi.
Co-Authors Budiman, Eunike Kathryn Mayvians, Tidelstein Pangestu, Kartika Siswanto, Vivienne Olivia Syailendra Putra, Moody Rizqy