Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Children from Siri's Marriage as Heirs in Review of Civil Law and Islamic Law Puruhita, Prasetyawati; Roynita, Windy
QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia Vol 2, No 2 (2023): December 2023
Publisher : CV. Rayyan Dwi Bharata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57235/qistina.v2i2.824

Abstract

Siri marriages are marriages that do not record their marital status to officials. Siri marriage has a number of detrimental effects on family formation, one of which is the lack of legal certainty in the distribution of inheritance. The author aims to determine the position, rights, and impacts of siri marriage for children of siri marriage as heirs in terms of civil law and Islamic law. The results showed that children from unregistered marriages could have civil ties with both parents and get their full rights if they received recognition from both parents. Meanwhile, Islamic law considers Siris marriage valid because it fulfills the conditions and harmony so that the child has the right to inherit in accordance with applicable regulations.
Analisa Kasus Jaksa Farizal yang Menerima Suap Dana Hartono, Ernita Dewy; Louissa, Natasha; sinsdanendra, Septyan; arrifa, Reisa; Roynita, Windy
Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan Vol 9 No 20 (2023): Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan
Publisher : Peneliti.net

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.8412871

Abstract

The rise of corruption cases that occurred became a driving force for the author to conduct research on this case. By using normative juridical writing techniques, namely collecting secondary materials and also literature study. From the results of the research, bribery of funds itself is an act of giving money or receiving money or gifts carried out by government officials to do or not doing something that’s contrary to their obligations, In Indonesia itself, cases of bribery often occur, even though this action violates Law No. 20 of 2001. The case presented by the author with this article is the case of Attorney Farizal receiving a bribe of 440, but Prosecutor Farizal has been sentenced by the court to a fine of 250,000,000 and imprisonment for 5 years. It could be nice for us to be aware of the case bribes around us.