Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan
Ranadi, Gladys Felicia
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Education Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan

 1 
Aspek Perjanjian Waralaba Perspektif Hukum Perdata Ranadi, Gladys Felicia; Urbanisasi, Urbanisasi
Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan Vol 9 No 22 (2023): Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan
Publisher : Peneliti.net

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.10115155

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to find out the Franchise agreement in Indonesia based on Law Number 9 of 1995 and Government Regulation Number 42 of 2007 and its shortcomings compared to more developed countries which have prioritized their advantages. A franchise agreement is a type of agreement often used in medieval commerce. But for nearly a century, these contracts have been used by legal entities looking to transact and generate higher profits. Legally, this franchise agreement is regulated in Decree no. 16 of 1997 concerning Franchising, which is regulated in Decree no. 42 of 2007, Kepmenperind RI No. 256/MPP//KEP/7/ concerning Regulations for the Implementation of Franchise based on Regulation of the Minister of Trade No. 12/M-Dag/Per/3/2006 concerning Registration and Commercial Regulations. In implementing a franchise agreement there are several principles of agreement, namely (1) The principle of freedom of contract, (2) the principle of consensualism, (3) the origin of trust, (4) the principle of strength binding, (5) the origin of legal equality, (6) the principle of balance, (7) the principle of legal certainty, (8) the principle of decency, and (9) the principle of custom. Disputes in franchise agreements can be resolved by deliberation or consensus or through judicial institutions and the Alternative Dispute Arbitration Board.
Perlindungan Hukum Rahasia Dagang Menurut No. 30 Tahun 2000 Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 332 K/Pid.Sus/2013 ranadi, Gladys felicia; Neltje, Jeane; Berliana, Marsela; Siahaan, Shinta Aulia; Manurung, Rachel Wahyunita Theodor
Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan Vol 10 No 8 (2024): Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan
Publisher : Peneliti.net

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.11108724

Abstract

This writing was carried out using Normative legal research methods using legal case studies, such as legal reviews. This research also uses a prescriptive approach, this approach is carried out by reviewing all regulations related to legal case studies. The Trade Secrets Law was born because it aims to protect the confidentiality of a company so that it is not known by other companies. This is expected to avoid unfair competition. Trade secrets are part of Intellectual Property Rights. This trade secret can be given to information that is considered confidential, where the parties who have mastered the secret have taken steps that have been determined. Law No. 30 of 2000 concerning Trade Secrets is a complement to Law no. 5 of 1999 concerning Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition. The concept of trade secrets itself was discovered by the Chinese around 3000 years BC. A form of legal protection between employers and employees is an employment agreement that contains confidentiality clauses.
Co-Authors Berliana, Marsela Manurung, Rachel Wahyunita Theodor Neltje, Jeane Siahaan, Shinta Aulia Urbanisasi, Urbanisasi