Saputra, Adi Dwifana
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Disease Classification on Rice Leaves using DenseNet121, DenseNet169, DenseNet201 Saputra, Adi Dwifana; Hindarto, Djarot; Santoso, Handri
Sinkron : jurnal dan penelitian teknik informatika Vol. 7 No. 1 (2023): Articles Research Volume 7 Issue 1, 2023
Publisher : Politeknik Ganesha Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33395/sinkron.v8i1.11906

Abstract

Rice is a plant that can grow in the tropics. This plant can produce food that can meet the needs of the people of a country. This plant can grow well if it is cared for properly. If the planting has used good care, such as providing adequate water, adding good fertilizer, it can be ascertained that it will produce a lot of rice fruit after harvesting. This often causes concern if rice growers have given good care but often produce less rice fruit because rice plants are attacked by various diseases. This is what makes the problem, that rice plants are attacked by diseases. Before spraying diseases or pests, farmers should have an understanding of diseases in rice. This makes farmers not wrong in choosing drugs for farmers' rice. It is very vulnerable if farmers do not know about the rice disease. Therefore, it is necessary to observe what types of rice diseases attack rice plants. Observations are not enough just to take pictures with a camera. But it is necessary to carry out further analysis of rice diseases. The presence of information technology is now able to recognize any type. One of the machine learning technologies is able to detect rice diseases. One of these branches of machine learning is deep learning. By using a dataset that focuses on rice disease, the model generated from deep learning training is able to detect rice disease. The purpose of this research is to predict disease in rice leaves using deep learning, namely DenseNet. Training using DenseNet, namely DenseNet121, DenseNet169 and DenseNet201. Accuracy using DenseNet121 reached 91.67%, DenseNet169 reached 90%, and DenseNet201 reached 88.33%. The model training time takes 24 seconds.
Comparison of Accuracy in Detecting Tomato Leaf Disease with GoogleNet VS EfficientNetB3 Saputra, Adi Dwifana; Hindarto, Djarot; Rahman, Ben; Santoso, Handri
Sinkron : jurnal dan penelitian teknik informatika Vol. 7 No. 2 (2023): Research Article, Volume 7 Issue 2 April, 2023
Publisher : Politeknik Ganesha Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33395/sinkron.v8i2.12218

Abstract

Tomato diseases vary greatly, one of which is tomato leaf disease. Some variants of leaf diseases include late blight, septoria leaf, yellow leaf curl virus, bacteria, mosaic virus, leaf fungus, two-spotted spider mite, and powdery mildew. By knowing the disease on tomato leaves, you can find medicine for the disease. So that it can increase the production of tomatoes with good quality and a lot of quantity. The problem that often occurs is that farmers cannot determine the disease in plants, they try to find suitable herbal medicines for their plants. After being given the drug, many plants actually died due to the pesticides given to the tomato plants. This is detrimental to tomato farmers. This problem is caused by incorrect disease detection. Therefore, this study aims to solve the problem of disease detection in tomato plants, in a more specific case, namely tomato leaves. Detection in this study uses a deep learning algorithm that uses a Convolutional Neural Network, specifically GoogleNet and EfficientNetB3. The dataset used comes from kaggle and google image. Both data sets have been pre-processed to match the data set class. Image preprocessing is performed to produce appropriate image datasets and improve performance accuracy. The dataset is trained to get the model. The training using GoogleNet resulted in an accuracy of 98.10%, loss of 0.0602 and using EfficientNetB3 resulted in an accuracy of 99.94%, loss: 0.1966.