Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal PREDATECS: Public Research Journal of Engineering, Data Technology and Computer Science
Winanda, Salsa
Unknown Affiliation
Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Application of Convolutional Neural Network ResNet-50 V2 on Image Classification of Rice Plant Disease Hastari, Delvi; Winanda, Salsa; Pratama, Aditya Rezky; Nurhaliza, Nana; Ginting, Ella Silvana
Public Research Journal of Engineering, Data Technology and Computer Science Vol. 1 No. 2: PREDATECS January 2024
Publisher : Institute of Research and Publication Indonesia (IRPI).

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57152/predatecs.v1i2.865

Abstract

Rice is the most important crop in global food security and socioeconomic stability. A part of the world's population makes rice a food requirement but the problem is found that all rice varieties suffer from several diseases and pests. Therefore, it is necessary to ensure the quality of healthy and proper rice growth by detecting diseases present in rice plants and treatment of affected plants. In this study, the Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) algorithm was applied in classifying diseases on the leaves of rice plants by experimenting with several parameters and architecture to get the best accuracy. This study was conducted image classification of rice plant disease using CNN architecture ResNet-50V2 with data using preprocessing Augmentation. The test was conducted with three optimizers such as SGD, Adam, and RMSprop by combining various parameters, namely epoch, batch size, learning rate, and SGD and RMSprop optimizers. Division of image data with 70:30 ratio of training data and test data; 80:20; 90:10. From these results, it was found that Adam was the best optimizer in the 80:20 data division in this study with an accuracy level of 0.9992, followed by the SGD optimizer with an accuracy level of 0.9983, while the RMSProp optimizer was ranked third with an accuracy level of 0.9978.
Co-Authors Ginting, Ella Silvana Hastari, Delvi Nurhaliza, Nana Pratama, Aditya Rezky