Ramadhani, Sherlyta
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Studi Kasus Perilaku Psikopat Dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan dari Perspektif Kriminologi Raharjo, Angga Sandhika; Asmara, Daffi Allegra; Delzanty, Kayla; Talitha, Raisyha; Rosdiana, Hani; Ramadhani, Sherlyta; Setiady, Achmad Hanif Avicenna; M, Mulyadi
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 2, No 2 (2024): June
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.11387193

Abstract

Crime is a complex phenomenon that can be understood from various points of view. In the context of criminology, crime refers to human actions that violate the basic norms that apply in society. In this research, the author conducted a review of previous research. This research uses a normative juridical research method by examining statutory regulations sourced from the Criminal Code, namely the Law that regulates murder as stated in CHAPTER XIX Crimes against Life, namely Articles 338-350 of the Criminal Code. This research emphasizes the criminological implications of the crime of murder committed by psychopaths and the legal resolution.Angga Sandhika Raharjo[1], Daffi Allegra Asmara2, Kayla Delzanty3, Raisyha Talitha4, Hani Rosdiana5, Sherlyta Ramadhani6, Achmad Hanif Avicenna Setiady7, Mulyadi8*[1]Email penulis: 2210611063@mahasiswa.upnvj.ac.id1,  2210611073@mahasiswa.upnvj.ac.id2 2210611172@mahasiswa.upnvj.ac.id3 , 2210611178@mahasiswa.upnvj.ac.id4 . 2210611195mahasiswa.upnvj.ac.id5, 2210611199@mahasiswa.upnvj.ac.id62210611329@mahasiswa.upnvj.ac.id7
Analisis Yuridis terhadap Pengrusakan Barang Milik Orang Lain Tanpa Disengaja Menurut Hukum Perdata dan Pidana Delzanty, Kayla; Talitha, Raisyha; Hakim, Mohammad Akmal Taris; Rosdiana, Hani; Ramadhani, Sherlyta; Yuli, Yuliana
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 2, No 2 (2024): June
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.11378612

Abstract

Damaging other people's property is behavior that invites concern and worry in society. This action not only harms individual rights and interests, but also has broad social impacts. The material losses that arise can have an impact on the economic stability of a person or even a community. Apart from that, there are psychological aspects that also have an influence, such as feelings of insecurity and loss of trust in the surrounding environment. Therefore, legal regulations in both the criminal and civil realms have formulated strict provisions regarding this matter. In the realm of criminal law, destroying property can be considered a criminal act that can be subject to sanctions in the form of imprisonment or a fine, depending on the severity of the act and the value of the loss caused. Meanwhile, in the realm of civil law, damage to goods can be a basis for the owner of the goods to demand compensation for the losses suffered. The debate around how to confront and deal with damage to other people's property from a criminal and civil law perspective is becoming increasingly important in the context of justice and the protection of society.