Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

I Made Pariartha

Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Warmadewa Denpasar Bali

Author-ID : 966751

Health Professions Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Public Health

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document

Claim Missing Document

Articles

Faktor-faktor yang Mendukung dan Menghambat Dilakukannya Versi Luar pada Kehamilan dengan Presentasi Bokong di Yogyakarta Pariartha, I Made; Siswishanto, Rukmono; Pangastuti, Nuring
JURNAL KESEHATAN REPRODUKSI Vol 7, No 2 (2020)
Publisher : Fakultas Kedokteran, Kesehatan Masyarakat dan Keperawatan UGM

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jkr.59811

Background: Guidelines recommend that external cephalic version (ECV) should be offer to all women with fetus in breech presentation at term. Many literature show external cephalic version can lowering c-section rate caused by breech presentation.Objective: To explore the determinants (barriers and facilitators) affecting obstetricians and gynaecologists to do external cephalic version at Yogyakarta.Method: Explanatory mixed methods design with quantitative-qualitative model. Survey with validated questionnaire and in-depth interview with semi-structured question was done January 2019 until August 2019.Results and Discussion: 72 respondents (83.7%) was responded to questionnaire and in-depth interview was done to 12 respondents. Adherence to ECV guideline was varied: counselling (20.8%), advising for ECV (15.3%), and arranged for ECV to for (almost) all their clients (16.6%). Although 76.4% of respondents considered ECV to be an effective treatment for preventing caesarean childbirth, only 18.1% respondents agreed that every client with breech presentation should undergo ECV. Self-efficacy was the most important determinant influencing adherence. In-depth interview shows several determinants to performed or did not performed ECV: skill of clinicians, guideline for ECV, facility to emergency c-section, ECV characteristic, cost, other methods for breech presentation, perception about ECV in lowering c-section rate, perceived ECV risk and patient preferences.Conclusion: Most respondents agreed that ECV was effective intervention to reduce caesarean childbirth, but adherence to counselling, advising and arranging ECV for clients still very low. Several determinants influenced obstetrician and gynaecologists to perform or did not perform ECV.Keywords: External cephalic version; breech presentation; determinants.

Faktor-faktor yang Mendukung dan Menghambat Dilakukannya Versi Luar pada Kehamilan dengan Presentasi Bokong di Yogyakarta I Made Pariartha; Rukmono Siswishanto; Nuring Pangastuti
JURNAL KESEHATAN REPRODUKSI Vol 7, No 2 (2020)
Publisher : Fakultas Kedokteran, Kesehatan Masyarakat dan Keperawatan UGM

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jkr.59811

Background: Guidelines recommend that external cephalic version (ECV) should be offer to all women with fetus in breech presentation at term. Many literature show external cephalic version can lowering c-section rate caused by breech presentation.Objective: To explore the determinants (barriers and facilitators) affecting obstetricians and gynaecologists to do external cephalic version at Yogyakarta.Method: Explanatory mixed methods design with quantitative-qualitative model. Survey with validated questionnaire and in-depth interview with semi-structured question was done January 2019 until August 2019.Results and Discussion: 72 respondents (83.7%) was responded to questionnaire and in-depth interview was done to 12 respondents. Adherence to ECV guideline was varied: counselling (20.8%), advising for ECV (15.3%), and arranged for ECV to for (almost) all their clients (16.6%). Although 76.4% of respondents considered ECV to be an effective treatment for preventing caesarean childbirth, only 18.1% respondents agreed that every client with breech presentation should undergo ECV. Self-efficacy was the most important determinant influencing adherence. In-depth interview shows several determinants to performed or did not performed ECV: skill of clinicians, guideline for ECV, facility to emergency c-section, ECV characteristic, cost, other methods for breech presentation, perception about ECV in lowering c-section rate, perceived ECV risk and patient preferences.Conclusion: Most respondents agreed that ECV was effective intervention to reduce caesarean childbirth, but adherence to counselling, advising and arranging ECV for clients still very low. Several determinants influenced obstetrician and gynaecologists to perform or did not perform ECV.Keywords: External cephalic version; breech presentation; determinants.

Perbedaan Efektivitas Diskusi Kelompok, Motivasi Intrinsik dan Nilai Modul dari Mahasiswa yang Difasilitasi Dosen dan Tutor Sebaya I Made Pariartha; Rossi Sanusi; Tridjoko Hadianto
Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia: The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education Vol 3, No 2 (2014): JULI
Publisher : Asosiasi Institusi Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia

Background: Peer teaching is a teaching method that widely applied in many medical institutions. This research was designed to evaluate group discussion effectiveness, intrinsic motivation, and student achievement differences between peer tutor−facilitated students and faculty tutor−facilitated students.Method: This research is an experimental research using post−test only control group design during the implementation of third and fourth module of the Cardiovascular Block (consist of five modules). Fifty-nine third year students were randomly assigned into two groups. Three experimental groups (n= 30) was facilitated by peer tutors (PT) and three control groups (n= 29) was facilitated by faculty tutors (FT). Two students were randomly elected from each PT group as peer tutor. A six hour training was given to the peer tutors. In the end of the third and fourth module, group discussion effectiveness, intrinsic motivation, and student achievement in those modules were evaluated using Tutorial Group Effectivenes Instrument (TGEI) questionnaire, Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI) questionnaire, and 20 multiple choice questions, respectively. Mean differences between groups were measured by Cohen's d with the practical significance at Cohen's d > 1.Results: There was no significant differences of group discussion effectiveness (Cohen’s d= -0.41) and intrinsic motivation (Cohen’s d= -0.83) between two groups. Significant difference in student achievement is found between those groups, peer tutor−facilitated students score higher than faculty tutor−facilitated students (Cohen’s d= 2.96). Peer tutors showed higher achievement than discussants (Cohen’s d= 1.86).Conclusion: The results showed that peer tutor can facilitated group discussion as well as faculty tutor in group discussion effectiveness, intrinsic motivation and student achievement paramaters. There was advantage for students who given role as peer tutor.

Title

Found 3 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 3 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 3 Documents
Search