Sport and Fitness Journal
Volume 5, No.3, 2017

ACTIVE ONE LEG STANDING EXERCISE LEBIH EFEKTIF DARIPADA CONTACTUAL HAND ORIENTATING RESPONSE (CHOR)EXERCISE UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN MOBILITAS PASIEN PASCA STROKE

Bambang Widayanto (Program Studi Magister Fisiologi Olahraga Universitas Udayana)
Alex Pangkahila (Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Udayana)
Muh Irfan (Fakultas Fisioterapi Universitas Esa Unggul)
Ida Bagus Ngurah (Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Udayana)
I Putu Adiartha Griadhi (Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Udayana)
Mutiah Munawarah (Fakultas Fisioterapi Universitas Esa Unggul)



Article Info

Publish Date
14 Sep 2017

Abstract

Stroke is a syndrome caused by circulatory disorders of the brain (CVA) with acute onset, accompanied by clinical manifestations in the form of neurological deficit and not as a result of tumor, trauma or infection of the central nervous system. Perfomance Mobility impairment is the consequences caused by stroke. The purpose of this study was to compare a Active One Leg Standing and Contactual Hand Orientating Response (CHOR) Exercise in order to improve performance mobility instroke patients. This research used experimental methods with pre-test and post-test control group design. The number of samples per group is 7 people. Group I was gaveActive One Leg Standing Exercise, group II was gaveContactual Hand Orientating Response (CHOR) Exercise. Each group is given an exercise with an hour duration, 3 times a week for 6 weeks. Mobility perfomance measured using POMA-TinettiTest. It was concluded that Active One Leg Standing and contactual Hand orientating Response (CHOR) exercise can improve perfomance mobility in post-stroke patients. There is a significant difference in perfomance mobility level between Active One Leg Standing and contactual Hand orientating Response (CHOR) exercise.Result: (1) The result of t-test related showed mean ± SB pre test (15.57 ± 2.29) and post test (21.42 ± 2.50) with p value <0.05. (2) The result of t-test related showed mean ± SB pre test (13.85 ± 3.93) and post test (18.14 ± 3.89) with p value <0.05. (3) The result of comparation test showed the mean ± SB group I (6.85 ± 1.06) and group II (4.28 ± 0.75) with p value <0.05.

Copyrights © 2017