Holistic Al-Hadis : Jurnal Studi Hadis, Keindonesiaan, dan Integrasi Keilmuan
Vol 2 No 1 (2016): January - June 2016

KRITIK MATAN HADIS Studi Komparatif antara al-A‘ẓamī dan G.H.A Juynboll

Masrukhin Muhsin (Unknown)

Article Info

Publish Date
06 Jun 2016

Abstract

The traditional methods of criticism to the matn of ḥadîths (i.e. muqâranah and mu‘âraḍah) which are employed by the muḥaddithîn are claimed by M. M. Azami to be more accurate and comprehensive, in comparison to the common link method which is introduced by G. H. A. Juynboll. In principle, both muqâranah and mu‘âraḍah work by comparing a concept contained in a hadîth in question to the concept contained in Alqur’ân, Hadîth Mutawâtir, logic, and so on. Meanwhile, common link as a method only compares the wordings of simmilar ḥadîths in question. When the wordings are fitted, the ḥadîths are regarded as ṣaḥîḥ. In contrary, if the wordings are not compatible, the ḥadîths are then regarded weak.

Copyrights © 2016




Citation Download
RIS
EndNote, Reference Manager, ProCite
BibTex
Latex, Jabref
Original Source
Download Original
Google Scholar
Check in Google Scholar
Journal Info
Holistic Al-Hadis : Jurnal Studi Hadis, Keindonesiaan, dan Integrasi Keilmuan
Website

Abbrev

holistic

Publisher

Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten

Subject

Religion Humanities Social Sciences Other

Description

The Journal seeks to place Hadith as its central focus of academic inquiry and to encourage comprehensive consideration of its many facets; to provide a forum for the study of Hadith in its global context; to encourage interdisciplinary studies of the Hadith that are crossnational and comparative; ...