<![CDATA[The background of this study is the low learning outcomes IPA. This is evidenced from 40students only 20 students who completed and the average value of students was 59.50. Thisresearch is a class action, the study was conducted in two cycles. The data used in this studyare the activities of teachers and students and learning outcomes. Based on the survey resultsrevealed that the strategy of inquiry biology to improve learning outcomes IPA. This isevidenced by: (a) the activities of teachers and students increased in every cycle. In the firstcycle of meetings 1 percentage teacher activity was 42.00%, in the first cycle of activityteacher meeting 2 percentage is 52.00%, the second cycle of meetings 1 percentage teacheractivity is 65.00%, and in the first cycle of meeting 2 percentage activity teacher is 78.00%,while the activity of students has increased at each cycle. At the first meeting I cycle thepercentage of student activity is 49.00%, in the first cycle of meeting 2 percentage of studentactivity is 61.00%. In the second cycle first meeting of the percentage of student activity is68.00%, and in the first cycle of meeting 2 percentage of student activity is 81.00%; and (b)completeness student learning outcomes in each cycle has increased. At the base score is thenumber of students who pass the 20 (50.00%), in the first cycle is the number of students whopass the 26 (65.00%) and the second cycle is the number of students who pass the 34(85.00%). In addition the value of learning students also increased in each cycle, the basescore is the average value obtained by the students was 59.50, in the first cycle the averagevalue obtained by the students is 64, and the second cycle the average value obtained studentsis 68.]]>
Copyrights © 2016
