Ganesha Law Review
Vol 2 No 2 (2020): November

ANALISIS YURIDIS (STUDI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 264K/PDT.SUS-HKI/2015) TERHADAP PENGHAPUSAN PENDAFTARAN MEREK AKIBAT MEREK TIDAK DIPERGUNAKAN DALAM KEGIATAN PERDAGANGAN

Pastika Jaya, Ketut (Unknown)
Sudiatmaka, Ketut (Unknown)
Sari Adnyani, Ni Ketut (Unknown)

Article Info

Publish Date
01 Feb 2021

Abstract

This study was conducted in order to know and understand about the cancellation of the brands carried in trading activities in accordance with Act No. 20 of 2016 on the brand and geographical indications. This study is the method of normative research using qualitative descriptive type of approach, the conceptual approach and the approach of the legislation. And then analyzed using the primary legal materials, secondary and tertiary to obtain relevant conclusions to the problems faced. The results showed that the appeal filed by INTER IKEA Systems BV was rejected on the grounds of Law No. 15 of 2001 on the brand, the brand set to be deleted from the list of generic brand if not used for 3 (three) years in a row.

Copyrights © 2020




Citation Download
RIS
EndNote, Reference Manager, ProCite
BibTex
Latex, Jabref
Original Source
Download Original
Google Scholar
Check in Google Scholar
Journal Info
Ganesha Law Review
Website

Abbrev

GLR

Publisher

Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

Subject

Description

GANESHA LAW REVIEW is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes scientific articles in the field of law. The published articles are the results of original scientific research and review of legal interactions. GANESHA LAW REVIEW is published by Faculty of Law and Social Sciences of Universitas ...