Law and Justice
Vol 5, No 2 (2020)

Impact of Structured, Systematic and Massive Violations In the General Election

Mahyudin, Mahyudin (Unknown)
Haryanto, Edy (Unknown)
Marsinah, Rahmah (Unknown)



Article Info

Publish Date
27 Nov 2020

Abstract

Authority in resolving disputes regarding the results of general elections is the authority of the constitutional court granted by the constitution. While the authority in resolving violations is structured, systematic and massive is the authority of the electoral supervisory body granted by law. In the dispute over the results of the general election, which was decided by the constitutional court, the constitutional court did not have the authority to test the petition filed on the basis of a structured, systematic and massive violation because the constitutional court only based on the dispute over the results as intended in its authority. The court verdict has been in accordance with the authority held according to the original instruction given by the constitution, which wants the implementation of elections that are sovereign and carried out on a direct, public, free, confidential, honest and fair basis.

Copyrights © 2020






Journal Info

Abbrev

v

Publisher

Subject

Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Description

Law and Justice e-ISSN:2549-8282 is a publication which contains information, communication, and development of law science. This journal discuss about legal studies which are the result of research in the field of law to promote the value of transedental, the value of nationalism, and the values of ...