Jurnal Konstitusi
Vol 8, No 2 (2011)

Tafsir Misoginisme dan Inkonsistensi Birokrat (Implikasi Putusan MK No. 4/PUU-VIII/2010)

Abdul Wahid (Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang Jl. M.T Haryono Malang)

Article Info

Publish Date
20 May 2016

Abstract

The verdict of Constitutional Court (MK) Number 4/PUU-VIII/2010 can be described as a verdict blocking chances for the civil servant (Pegawai Negeri Sipil) to represent himself/herself as the head of executive in the district such as governor, mayor, regent, and any others in the mayor general  election  (Pemilukada)  because  one  of  the  prerequisites  to  be a civil servant must be followed by a resignation letter. This prerequisite cannot be considered as a form of discrimination and injustice for the civil servant, yet as a kind of protection through the strategic role of the civil servant. If the civil servant still keeps going on its track, as a bureaucracy devotee, then people’s civil rights must have been fulfilled.

Copyrights © 2016




Citation Download
RIS
EndNote, Reference Manager, ProCite
BibTex
Latex, Jabref
Full PDF
336.879 KB
Original Source
Download Original
Google Scholar
Check in Google Scholar
Journal Info
Jurnal Konstitusi
Website

Abbrev

jk

Publisher

Pusat Penelitian dan Pengkajian Perkara dan Pengelolaan Perpustakaan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

Subject

Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Description

The aims of this journal is to provide a venue for academicians, researchers and practitioners for publishing the original research articles or review articles. The scope of the articles published in this journal deal with a broad range of topics in the fields of Constitutional Law and another ...