Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

All

Jurnal Konstitusi

jk
Website

Published by Pusat Penelitian dan Pengkajian Perkara dan Pengelolaan Perpustakaan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

ISSN : 18297706 EISSN : 25481657 DOI : https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1841

Core Subject : Humanities, Social,

Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

The aims of this journal is to provide a venue for academicians, researchers and practitioners for publishing the original research articles or review articles. The scope of the articles published in this journal deal with a broad range of topics in the fields of Constitutional Law and another section related contemporary issues in law.

Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum

Articles 522 Documents

1 2 3 4 5

Resultan Politik dan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 14/PUU-XI/2013 dalam Politik Hukum Pemilu Sholehudin Zuhri
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 15, No 2 (2018)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Dalam perkembangan politik hukum kontemporer, keputusan politik dalam pembentukan regulasi sering dihadapkan pada dua persoalan sekaligus yang saling berhadapan. Konfigurasi politik dalam pembentukan Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017, partai politik di parlemen tidak hanya merepresentasikan kepentingan politiknya, tetapi juga dihadapkan pada keharusan mengakomodir putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 14/PUU-XI/2013 sebagai koreksi keputusan politik yang otoriter. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian yuridis normatif dengan metode kualitatif, studi ini menitikberatkan pada pemahaman komprehensif yang meliputi interaksi politik dan hukum dalam terciptanya konfigurasi politik hukum pemilu. Hasil studi ini dapat menjelaskan kepatuhan partai politik terhadap hukum dalam menciptakan konfigurasi politik di parlemen, namun di sisi lainnya lemahnya partai politik dalam membangun koalisi dalam mewujudkan sistem pemilu demokratis justru menjadikan keputusan politik yang dipilih menjadi otoriter dalam pelaksana teknisnya. Kehadiran hukum dalam perkembangan konfigurasi politik kontemporer, dapat menjadi paradigma baru dalam terciptanya konfigurasi politik demokratis yang pada akhirnya terbentuknya hukum pemilu yang demokratis.In the development of contemporary political laws, political decisions in regulatory formation are often confronted with two issues at once facing each other. The political configuration in the Law No. 7 year 2017, political parties in parliament not only represent political interests but also face the necessity to accommodate the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 14/ PUU-XI/2013 as a correction of authoritarian political decisions. This research is normative juridical research with qualitative method. The results of this study can explain the compliance of political parties to the law in creating the political configuration in parliament. Yet on the other hand, the weakness of political parties in building coalitions in realizing the democratic election system makes the selected political decision become authoritarian in its technical execution. The presence of law in the development of contemporary political configuration can be a new paradigm in creating democratic political configuration which ultimately the formation of democratic law of elections.

Relevansi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 22/PUU-XV/2017 dalam Upaya Mencegah Perkawinan Usia Anak Haniah Ilhami
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 17, No 2 (2020)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

This research concludes that the Constitutional Court Decision Number 22 / PUU-XV / 2017 which mandates the legislators to revise the age-limit of marriage, is irrelevant in preventing child-age marriages. Indonesian marriage legal system continues to open up opportunities for deviations of the principle of age-limit of marriage through Dispensation of Marriage. This research finds the juridical development on Dispensation of Marriage on the type of marriage requiring Dispensation of Marriage, the applicant of Dispensation of Marriage, the authority to provide Dispensation of Marriage, and the administrative requirements to submit the Dispensation. Based on these developments, several factors that cause irrelevancy of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 22 / PUU-XV / 2017 in preventing child-age marriages are the absence of specific requirements in the application of Dispensation of Marriage to the court, the existence of the Principle of Freedom in procedural law, the voluntary nature attached in the request for Dispensation of Marriage, as well as the extension of provisions of applicants who can submit an application to the court.

Urgensi Pengaturan Lembaga Negara Khusus dalam Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 Nuriyanto Ahmad Daim
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 16, No 1 (2019)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Penyelenggaraan negara dan pemerintahan sebelum reformasi ditandai dengan praktik maladministrasi termasuk korupsi, kolusi dan nepotisme (KKN), sehingga mutlak diperlukan reformasi birokrasi pemerintah. Dalam rangka reformasi penyelenggaraan negara dan pemerintahan di Indonesia, didirikan lembaga baru yang tidak pernah ada pada masa pemerintahan orde lama dan orde baru yang berkuasa sebelumnya. Salah satu lembaga baru adalah Ombudsman Republik Indonesia (ORI), sehingga dalam praktik ketatanegaraan Indonesia saat ini, terdapat 4 (empat) pilar kekuasaan yang berkedudukan setara, yaitu Eksekutif, Legislatif, Yudisial dan Lembaga Negara Khusus yang terdiri dari BPK, Ombudsman, Komnas HAM dan KPK. Dengan metode penelitian normatif dan pendekatan konseptual dengan menjadikan Ombudsman sebagai obyek penelitian didapat temuan bahwa BPK, Ombudsman, Komnas HAM dan KPK yang termasuk dalam lembaga negara khusus diposisikan sejajar dengan Legislatif, Eksekutif dan Yudisial. Walaupun pengaturannya hanya didasarkan pada undang-undang. Di masa yang akan datang agar lembaga negara dan komisi-komisi tersebut semakin legitimate dan kiprahnya semakin dapat dirasakan oleh masyarakat luas dan mampu mendorong terwujudnya penyelenggaraan pemerintahan yang bersih dan berwibawa, maka sudah selayaknya keberadaan lembaga negara khusus tersebut diatur dalam ketentuan norma dasar UUD 1945.

Eksistensi dan Karakteristik Putusan Bersyarat Mahkamah Konstitusi Faiz Rahman; Dian Agung Wicaksono
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 13, No 2 (2016)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

The result of this legal research show the existence of conditionally constitutional and conditionally unconstitutional decision in reviewing laws from 2003 to 2015, although that model of decision is not regulated in the positive law. There are 5 characteristics of conditionally constitutional decision, those are (1) Court gives interpretation or certain requirements in order to remain constitutional provisions tested throughout implemented according to the specified requirements of the Constitutional Court; (2) based on the rejected verdict; (3) a conditionally constitutional clause can be found only on the consideration of the Court, or can be found on the judgment and injunction; (4) conditionally constitutional decision require re-judicial review if the norm is not in line with the interpretation of the Constitutional Court; (5) encouraging legislative review. Regarding the conditionally unconstitutional decision, there are 4 characteristics, those are (1) the verdict certainly include a conditionally unconstitutional clause; (2) a conditionally verdict can be the meaning or interpretation of a norm, or give the terms of the norm is unconstitutional; (3) based on the granted verdict either partially or completely; (4) does not substantially different from the conditionally constitutional clause.

Pemikiran Hukum Progresif untuk Perlindungan Hukum dan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Hukum Adat Muh. Afdal Yanuar
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 18, No 1 (2021)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Today there are still many problems with the existence and traditional rights of indigenous and tribal peoples. These problems tend to place the indigenous and tribal peoples in a weak and marginalized position. Not without reason, it is due to the unequal perception of all related parties, in positioning customary land and indigenious peoples in the context of national and state life based on Pancasila and the Constitution. The issue that will be discussed in this paper is about how to realize progressive legal protection of the existence of indigenous and tribal peoples to realize their welfare. This paper will use the conceptual approach method, namely the Pancasila concept as a source of ideas in providing legal protection to indigenous and tribal peoples. Furthermore, it also uses a conceptual approach from thought of progressive law. The existence of the status quo in providing legal protection to indigenous and tribal peoples which tends to be static, conditional and legalistic which has been done so far. Legal protection is more concerned with how the criteria regarding indigenous and tribal peoples will be recognized. The state should have dared to make policy and legal breakthroughs to provide legal protection based on guidance and empowerment. These policy and legal breakthroughs can refer to thougt of progressive law, which positions the law for humans with the aim of providing justice, welfare and happiness for indigenous and tribal peoples based on Pancasila and the Constitution.

MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DAN KONTRAK OUTSOURCING Ahmad Fadlil Sumadi
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 9, No 1 (2012)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

The Amendment of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia has made the sovereignty still retained by the people, no more represented and fully held by the People’s Consultative Assembly like when the constitutional system of Indonesia was still embracing supremacy of parliament. In the constitutional perspective, the standing and relation between the state and people is becoming more obvious. Hence, in the case that constitutional dispute happened, there should have been an adjudication forum for solving the dispute. Therefore, Contitutional Court Of the Republic of Indonesia is established and designed constitutionally to solve the constitutional dispute through The Amendment of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Settlement of constitutional dispute through the review of constitutionality of norms in the regulation of outsourcing contract in The Labour Law at Contitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, with specific issue “the Contract of Employment for a specified time” that is regulated in Article 65 paragraph (7) and Article 66 paragraph (2) b of Labour Law is declaredconditionally unconstitutional.

Konstruksi Pertentangan Norma Hukum dalam Skema Pengujian Undang-Undang Tanto Lailam
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 11, No 1 (2014)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

The study elaborated on the construction of “conflict of legal norms” in constitutional review scheme. There are eleven problems as result of this study, which include: The ideology of the state “Pancasila” as a standard review of “conflict of legal norms” act against 1945 constitution; Constitutional court has a review of act passed before and after 1945 Constitution amendment with standard of 1945 constitution; 1945 constitution is “the living constitution” for the enforcing of law and justice; Constitutional court has authority to review of act against 1945 constitution by vertical and horizontal perspective; enforceability aspect of constitutional review is a part of material review, not formal review; the meaning of “conflict of legal norms” must be comprehend elaborated in the decisions to enforcing of law and justice; Constitutional Court does not used priority of the original intent interpretation and remained unfulfilled of other model interpretation if original intent interpretation caused ineffectiveness of constitution; non constitution be permitted for the formal review, but in material review is not implement; “nemo judex idoneus in propria causa” of procedural law principle can remained unfulfilled by “ius curia novit” principle to promote of the 1945 constitution; the formal review of “conflict of legal norms” can remained unfulfilled by utility principle to priority of legal substance; the retroactive decision caused legal uncertainly.

Pengakuan Hak Konstitusional Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Industri Ekstraktif dalam Mewujudkan Kesejahteraan Rakyat Cut Asmaul Husna TR
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 11, No 1 (2014)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Resource management, extractive industries have a significant role to state revenues. Extractive industries sector in Indonesia is a very closed industry sectors primarily on revenues derived from state income Cooperation Contract (KKS). Resource management paradigm for the extractive industries exploited only to pursue exchange of reliance State Budget (Budget) by denying the maximum prosperity for the people. Globalization can not be avoided has affected the existence of Law No. 22 of 2001 on Oil and Gas value-laden liberal-capitalistic. Consequently, there has been a paradigm shift in both the PSC and the people of the country to the tyranny of capital resulted in the country and people can not renegotiate the contract. Therefore, reform of the legal arrangements in the extractive industries absolutely must be done in order to realize the people’s welfare. Urgency juridical formation of the Draft Law on Amendments of Law No. 22 of 2001, based on the decision of the Constitutional Court Case No. 002/PUU-I/2003 and Decision No. 36/PUU-X/2012. Just and prosperous society, as a goal, requires the struggle to create the basics, which is referred to as the national interests of the Indonesian people. All efforts and actions to ensure the implementation of state remains fixed on the terminus ad quem, just and prosperous society.

Putusan Ultra Petita Mahkamah Konstitusi Ach. Rubaie; Nyoman Nurjaya; Moh. Ridwan; Istislam Istislam
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 11, No 1 (2014)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Basic considerations of the Constitutional Court made ultra petita verdict was:(a) philosophical reasons in order to enforce substantive justice and constitutional justice as embodied in the Constitution NRI 1945, (b) theoretical grounds related to the authority of the judge to explore, discover and follow the legal values that live in the community, if the law does not exist or insufficient legal anymore (outdated), and (c) juridical reasons relating to the provision of Article 24 paragraph (1) NRI 1945 Constitution and Article 45 paragraph (1) of Law no. 24 year 2003 on the Constitutional Court, that Court as organizers aim to enforce the judicial justice according to law and the evidence and the judge's conviction. The verdict the Constitutional Court which is ultra petita basically acceptable, all associated to the subject of the request and based on considerations which can be accounted for philosophical (ie, contains the values of justice, morality, ethics, religion, principle, doctrine). The authority to make ultra petita verdict for the Constitutional Court can only be given if there is vagueness of legal norms (vague normen) through the method of interpretation of the law, or if a legal vacuum (rechts-vacuum) through the creation of legal methods (rechtschepping). But considering the legal interpretation and legal formation are highly subjective, hence in order to prevent abuse of power, the Constitutional Court issued a verdict ultra petita, should be limited by the principles of a democratic state of law, the principles of fair trial and impartial, and general principles of good governance.

Corporate Social Responsibility: A Constitutional Perspective Muchamad Ali Safa’at
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 11, No 1 (2014)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Originally, the concept of CSR was come from business ethic values that impose corporation’s ethical responsibly to their social and natural environment. That development of ethical business was part of social consciousness on the degradation of environment as impact of corporation activities. This reality also raised the deep environmental ethic or deep ecology which challenge anthropocentrism economical development and urged ecocentrism development. In Indonesia, this phenomenon was marked by the enactment of Act 4/1982 on Environmental Management.The constitutional debate on CSR just began when the Indonesian Constitutional Court heard and decided the judicial review case of Act 40/2007 on Limited Liability Company which stipulate CSR mandatory law for corporation that have activity in natural resources areas. In its decision, Constitutional Court refused the petition. This means that the court affirmed that CSR mandatory law is not contrary to the Constitution. However, the legal argumentation of the court was not shifted from economical and environmental perspectives. The constitutional basis of the decision is Article 33 (4) concerning national economic principles and Article 33 (3) concerning state power on land, water, and natural resources. The Constitutional Court did not use the human rights concept as the source of CSR mandatory law.In constitutional law perspective, we can justify the CSR mandatory law from human rights guarantee on the constitution. CSR is one of the obligations to respect, to protect, to fulfill, and to promote human rights. Those obligations are not only bind over the government, but also corporation and all citizens. In that perspective, CSR should be mandatory law not only for the corporation which manage or correlate with natural resource, but for all corporations that operate in the middle of the society.

Page 1 of 53 | Total Record : 522

1 2 3 4 5

Filter by Year

2015 2023

Filter By Issues

All Issue Vol. 20 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 19 No. 4 (2022) Vol 19, No 3 (2022) Vol 19, No 2 (2022) Vol 19, No 1 (2022) Vol 18, No 4 (2021) Vol 18, No 3 (2021) Vol 18, No 2 (2021) Vol 18, No 1 (2021) Vol 17, No 4 (2020) Vol 17, No 3 (2020) Vol 17, No 2 (2020) Vol 17, No 1 (2020) Vol 16, No 4 (2019) Vol 16, No 3 (2019) Vol 16, No 2 (2019) Vol 16, No 1 (2019) Vol 15, No 4 (2018) Vol 15, No 3 (2018) Vol 15, No 2 (2018) Vol 15, No 1 (2018) Vol 14, No 4 (2017) Vol 14, No 3 (2017) Vol 14, No 2 (2017) Vol 14, No 1 (2017) Vol 13, No 4 (2016) Vol 13, No 3 (2016) Vol 13, No 2 (2016) Vol 13, No 1 (2016) Vol 11, No 4 (2014) Vol 11, No 3 (2014) Vol 11, No 2 (2014) Vol 11, No 1 (2014) Vol 10, No 4 (2013) Vol 10, No 3 (2013) Vol 10, No 2 (2013) Vol 10, No 1 (2013) Vol 9, No 4 (2012) Vol 9, No 3 (2012) Vol 9, No 2 (2012) Vol 9, No 1 (2012) Vol 8, No 6 (2011) Vol 8, No 5 (2011) Vol 8, No 4 (2011) Vol 8, No 3 (2011) Vol 8, No 2 (2011) Vol 8, No 1 (2011) Vol 7, No 6 (2010) Vol 7, No 5 (2010) Vol 7, No 4 (2010) Vol 7, No 3 (2010) Vol 7, No 2 (2010) Vol 7, No 1 (2010) Vol 12, No 4 (2015) Vol 12, No 3 (2015) Vol 12, No 2 (2015) Vol 12, No 1 (2015) More Issue

Home Page

OAI Link

Editorial Team

Contact

Reviewer

Google Scholar

Contact Name
Abdul Basid Fuadi

Contact Email
jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id

Phone
+6281215312967

Journal Mail Official
jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id

Editorial Address
Pusat Penelitian dan Pengkajian Perkara dan Pengelolaan Perpustakaan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Jl. Medan Merdeka Barat No. 6, Jakarta 10110 Telp: (021) 23529000 Fax: (021) 3520177 E-mail: jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id

Location
Kota adm. jakarta pusat,

Dki jakarta

INDONESIA

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Home Page

OAI Link

Editorial Team

Contact

Reviewer

Google Scholar

Contact Name Abdul Basid Fuadi

Contact Email jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id

Phone +6281215312967

Journal Mail Official jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id

Editorial Address Pusat Penelitian dan Pengkajian Perkara dan Pengelolaan Perpustakaan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Jl. Medan Merdeka Barat No. 6, Jakarta 10110 Telp: (021) 23529000 Fax: (021) 3520177 E-mail: jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id

Location Kota adm. jakarta pusat, Dki jakarta INDONESIA

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Contact Name
Abdul Basid Fuadi

Contact Email
jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id

Phone
+6281215312967

Journal Mail Official
jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id

Editorial Address
Pusat Penelitian dan Pengkajian Perkara dan Pengelolaan Perpustakaan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Jl. Medan Merdeka Barat No. 6, Jakarta 10110 Telp: (021) 23529000 Fax: (021) 3520177 E-mail: jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id

Location
Kota adm. jakarta pusat,

Dki jakarta

INDONESIA