YUDISIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam
Vol 6, No 2 (2015): YUDISIA

KONTRADIKSI ANTAR DALIL DAN CARA PENYELESAIANNYA PRESPEKTIF USHULIYYIN

Ahmad Atabik (Stain Kudus)

Article Info

Publish Date
01 Dec 2015

Abstract

ABSTRAKThis article describes method in the study of ushul fiqh on contradictory dalil and the ways ushuliyyin solved this problem. In fact, there is no contradiction in the law, rather, sometimes mujtahid disputed over two arguments. Mujtahid of the classic era has been working in many ways to find solution of the problems. They are jam’u wa at-taufiq (comprise and compromise), tarjih (favor) and nasakh (abrogating). If al-jam’u is not possible to compromise among dalil, then mujtahid used tarjih (favoring one of them). However, should tarjih is impossible, then the last method is naskh, ie the first coming text is cancelled by the later one in chronological order. If they did not know which text came first, then tawaqquf was applied.  

Copyrights © 2015




Citation Download
RIS
EndNote, Reference Manager, ProCite
BibTex
Latex, Jabref
Original Source
Download Original
Google Scholar
Check in Google Scholar
Journal Info
YUDISIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam
Website

Abbrev

Yudisia

Publisher

Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Negeri Kudus

Subject

Religion Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Description

Artikel yang diterima dan diterbitkan dalam Jurnal YUDISIA harus masuk dalam lingkup keilmuan bidang hukum dan hukum Islam. Bidang hukum mencakup (tapi tidak terbatas pada bidang) : hukum materiil dan formil, tinjauan hukum dari aspek politik, sosial, ekonomi, antropologi, psikologi. Bidang hukum ...