Jurnal Bahasa Lingua Scientia
Vol 2 No 1 (2010)

DEBAT DAN ARGUMEN (HAKIKAT, RAGAM, DAN STRATEGI)

M. Jazeri (STAIN Tulungagung)



Article Info

Publish Date
08 Jun 2010

Abstract

Debate is arguing for certain topic with different  opinion or claim between affirmative team and negative team.  Seing from its elements, argument can be analyzed through two models; traditional argument model and Toulmin argument model. Traditional model is classified into four lay outs, namely (1) simple layout, (2) complex layout, (3) chain layout, and (4) compound layout.  Toulmin model is classified into five layouts, namely  layout I, layout II, layout III, layout IV, and layout V. Seing from its fallacy, the fallacy of argument is categorized into linguistics fallacy and relevance fallacy. Linguistics fallacies are equivoc term, amfiboly term, composition fallacy, devision fallacy, and accent fallacy. While relevance fallacies are argumentum ad hominem, argumentum ad verecundian, argumentum ad baculum, argumentum ad populum, argumentum ad misericordian, post hoc propter hoc, petitio principi, argumentum ad ignorantiam, dan ignoratio elenchi.

Copyrights © 2010






Journal Info

Abbrev

ls

Publisher

Subject

Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media

Description

Lingua Scientia Language Journal (JBLS) is an OJS-based language journal (Open Journal System) containing of high quality articles published by Center for Language Development of IAIN Tulungagung in June and November each year. Lingua Scientia Language Journal which has a printed ISSN 2086-1753 and ...