Kajian Ilmiah Hukum dan Kenegaraan
Vol. 1 No. 1 (2022): Juni

Studi Perbandingan Alat Bukti Saksi dalam KUHAP dan KUHAP Islam

Aisyah, Aisyah (Unknown)
Azharuddin, Azharuddin (Unknown)
Rizal, Said (Unknown)
Zulkifli, Suhaila (Unknown)

Article Info

Publish Date
24 Aug 2022

Abstract

Purpose: of the study is to provide knowledge and comparative analysis of witness rules in the burgerlijk wetboek/civil procedural law in Indonesia and Islamic civil procedural law as well as to provide a comparison of witness arrangements in the burgerlijk wetboek/civil procedural law in Indonesia and the burgerlijk wetboek/Islamic civil procedure law. Result: Civil procedural law makes witnesses not perfect evidence. However, for the religious court in the case of divorce, the witness seems to have the same power as a letter, even thought in principle it is different. Contribution: This condition seems to make civil procedural law in the Islamic religious court the same as the law stipulated in the Quran&Hadith. Where as civil procedural law in Indonesia is the same between state and religious courts.

Copyrights © 2022




Citation Download
RIS
EndNote, Reference Manager, ProCite
BibTex
Latex, Jabref
Original Source
Download Original
Google Scholar
Check in Google Scholar
Journal Info
Kajian Ilmiah Hukum dan Kenegaraan
Website

Abbrev

kihan

Publisher

Goodwood Publishing

Subject

Humanities Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Description

Kajian Ilmiah Hukum dan Kenegaraan (KIHAN) is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes quality papers in the fields of law and state. KIHAN aims to become a credible source related to law studies and mediates academicians, researchers, and practioners in dissemination their findings and ideas to solve ...