<![CDATA[Background : Sectio Caesarea is an alternative method of delivery over medical indications. Currently not rise above 11-15% of the medical indications for government hospitals and private hospitals 30-40%. Though many negative impactssuch as increased occurrence of infections by 80 times higher and 10 times higher chance of developing complicationsfrom anesthesia compared with normal deliveries. One non-medical indications that social factors such as excessiveanxiety husband and wife are not able to consider natural childbirth, concerns wife vagina become loose, and the reasonfor choosing the time and date of birthMethods : This research is aimed at analyzing the analytic psychosocial risk factors in the vaginal delivery methods andsectio Caesaria , as efforts to reduce maternal and infant mortality . The study design was a case-control . Cases andcontrols had been known at the time of study entry , and then explore psychosocial factors that play a role in the failureof vaginal delivery .Result : The results showed samples of 129 postpartum women , 64 postpartum women with vaginal delivery and 65puerperal women with childbirth sectio Caesarea.Conclusion : The results based on the age of the mother at the age of reproductive secure 109 ( 84.5 % ) , women witha high risk age 20 ( 15.5 % ) . Mother with good nutrition 91 ( 70.5 % ) , maternal malnutrition 38 ( 29.5 % ) , 59 womenwith higher education ( 47.5 % ) , low education 70 ( 54.3 % ) , 79 women with high economic ( 61.2 % ) , economy by 50( 38.8 % ) . Mothers who checkups more than 4 times the 118 ( 91.5 % ) . The test results showed a significant correlationbetween the positive direction of delivery methods with social risk factors but showed no association . Regression testresults showed no significant relationship between social risk factors with the method of delivery.]]>
Copyrights © 2013
