Jurnal Konstitusi
Vol 12, No 3 (2015)

Ultra Petita dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi

Abadi, Suwarno (Unknown)

Article Info

Publish Date
20 May 2016

Abstract

Ultra petita decision practiced under the MK’s jurisdiction to review the constitutionality of legislation needs to be assessed carefully. This practice should not be condemned as illegitimate because there is no explicit constitutional rule that guarantee it. The author therefore argues that this practice can be justified under two reasons. First, judicial activism. Second, the very nature of constitutional adjudication in order to defend the supremacy of the constitution over legislation. According to these reasons, the MK’s ultra petita decision should be upheld because this practice is the most reasonable means to protect the constitution.

Copyrights © 2015




Citation Download
RIS
EndNote, Reference Manager, ProCite
BibTex
Latex, Jabref
Full PDF
378.1 KB
Original Source
Download Original
Google Scholar
Check in Google Scholar
Journal Info
Jurnal Konstitusi
Website

Abbrev

jk

Publisher

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

Subject

Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Other

Description

Jurnal Konstitusi merupakan media triwulanan guna penyebarluasan (diseminasi) hasil penelitian atau kajian konseptual tentang konstitusi dan putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Konstitusi terbit empat nomor dalam setahun (Maret, Juni, September, dan Desember). Jurnal Konstitusi memuat hasil ...