Jurnal Dinamika Hukum
Vol 16, No 3 (2016)

BINDING FORCE OF CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW DECISION OF CONSTITUTIONAL COURT TOWARD SUPREME COURT

Rian Van Frits Kapitan (Faculty of Law Universitas Nusa Cendana Kupang)

Article Info

Publish Date
22 Feb 2017

Abstract

The Supreme Court decision which sentenced dr. Bambang suprapto.Sp.M.Surg. using article 76 of Law No 29 Year 2004 on the Practice of Medicine which had been annulled by the Constitutional Court has proved that the Supreme Court has put aside constitutional court's decision on constitutional review. This paper attempts to justify that at any reason, Constitutional Review decision of Constitutional Court still has binding force on the Supreme Court. It is based on four perspectives: 1. Historical perspective 2. Protected object perspective 3. Functional perspective, and 4. Normative perspective.Keywords: Binding Force, Constitutional Review, Constitutional Court, Supreme Court.

Copyrights © 2016




Citation Download
RIS
EndNote, Reference Manager, ProCite
BibTex
Latex, Jabref
Original Source
Download Original
Google Scholar
Check in Google Scholar
Journal Info
Jurnal Dinamika Hukum
Website

Abbrev

JDH

Publisher

Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

Subject

Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Description

Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Jenderal Soedirman adalah jurnal terakreditasi nasional yang berfungsi sebagai media informasi dan komunikasi di bidang hukum. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum diterbitkan 3 kali dalam satu tahun yaitu bulan Januari, Mei dan September yang didalamnya memuat ...