cover
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
,
INDONESIA
Civil Engineering Journal
Published by C.E.J Publishing Group
ISSN : 24763055     EISSN : 24763055     DOI : -
Core Subject : Engineering,
Civil Engineering Journal is a multidisciplinary, an open-access, internationally double-blind peer -reviewed journal concerned with all aspects of civil engineering, which include but are not necessarily restricted to: Building Materials and Structures, Coastal and Harbor Engineering, Constructions Technology, Constructions Management, Road and Bridge Engineering, Renovation of Buildings, Earthquake Engineering, Environmental Engineering, Geotechnical Engineering, Highway Engineering, Hydraulic and Hydraulic Structures, Structural Engineering, Surveying and Geo-Spatial Engineering, Transportation Engineering, Tunnel Engineering, Urban Engineering and Economy, Water Resources Engineering, Urban Drainage.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 5 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol 2, No 4 (2016): April" : 5 Documents clear
An Investigation of Local Site Effects Using Linear and Nonlinear analysis and Comparison Between Them Ali Komak Panah; Aylin Nouri
Civil Engineering Journal Vol 2, No 4 (2016): April
Publisher : Salehan Institute of Higher Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (979.18 KB) | DOI: 10.28991/cej-2016-00000018

Abstract

Recent code provisions for building and other structures (1994 and 1997 NEHRP provisions, 1997 UBC) have adopted new site classification. The new site classification system is based on average shear wave velocity to a depth of 30 m. when the shear wave velocity is not available; other soil properties such as undrained shear strength can be used. The study of propagation damages in various earthquakes illustrates the importance of the site effect on the ground seismic characteristics. From the point of the earthquake engineering view, the most important characteristics of the strong ground motion are amplitude, frequency content and duration. All of these properties have a significant effect on earthquake damage. The behavior of soils under cyclic loading is basically nonlinear and hysteretic. Ground response analysis is used to predict the movements of the ground and develop a design response spectrum in order to determine the dynamic stresses and strains and earthquake forces. The profile was studied by using various methods of soil response analysis and finally, the results were examined. In this paper, soil responses were examined by NERA, EERA software and the results compared with each other. Eventually, we concluded that the values obtained from the EERA are more than the value obtained from the NEERA software.
Modified Differential Transform Method for Solving Vibration Equations of MDOF Systems Mohammadamir Najafgholipour; Navid Soodbakhsh
Civil Engineering Journal Vol 2, No 4 (2016): April
Publisher : Salehan Institute of Higher Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1141.659 KB) | DOI: 10.28991/cej-2016-00000019

Abstract

Vibration equations of discrete multi-degrees-of-freedom (MDOF) structural systems is system of differential equations. In linear systems, the differential equations are also linear. Various analytical and numerical methods are available for solving the vibration equations in structural dynamics. In this paper modified differential transform method (MDTM) as a semi-analytical approach is generalized for the system of differential equations and is utilized for solving the vibration equations of MDOF systems. The MDTM is a recursive method which is a hybrid of Differential Transform Method (DTM), Pade' approximant and Laplace Transformation. A series of examples including forced and free vibration of MDOF systems with classical and non-classical damping are also solved by this method. Comparison of the results obtained by MDTM with exact solutions shows good accuracy of the proposed method; so that in some cases the solutions of the vibration equation that found by MDTM are the exact solutions. Also, MDTM is less expensive in computational cost and simpler with compare to the other available approaches.
Development a Conceptual Framework for Industrial and Hazardous Wastes Rating Systems Pourahmadi, Amirali; Ebadi, Taghi; Nikazar, Manouchehr
Civil Engineering Journal Vol 2, No 4 (2016): April
Publisher : Salehan Institute of Higher Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (723.577 KB) | DOI: 10.28991/cej-2016-00000020

Abstract

Production of a large volume of industrial and hazardous waste with various compositions makes the need for comprehensive management and consequently the concept of waste rating more tangible. Despite numerous waste rating systems presented so far, analyzing the makeup of such systems play a significant role in meeting human health. In this study, the structure of 34 rating systems of industrial and hazardous waste have been analyzed based on both quantitative and qualitative standpoints and the results are presented as a formational-conceptual framework. Results showed that every rating system is formed of two parts of formational fundamentals and functional indices, which the first part has a longitudinal relation with the second. While lowly considered, this study is focusing on the formational fundamental part in the rating systems of industrial and hazardous waste, as intellectual prerequisites in suggesting a new system. Some of the factors in the first level are: dependence of the organization which determines the policy and general goals of a rating system, time of presenting the method during which remarkable changes take place in computing methods of the rating systems, infrastructures and facilities which are efficient in the accuracy and scope of the system and finally references and standards causing variations in definitions and final results of the rating system. Furthermore, factors such as: aspects of the study and style of use are identified in second level of formational fundamentals. Finally, the fundamentals are presented in a formational-conceptual framework for better perceiving and more effective use.
Marine Current Meter Calibration Using GNSS Receivers, a Comparison with Commercial Method Vahid Rezaali; Alireza A. Ardalan
Civil Engineering Journal Vol 2, No 4 (2016): April
Publisher : Salehan Institute of Higher Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1206.061 KB) | DOI: 10.28991/cej-2016-00000021

Abstract

Getting information from marine current requires that accurate and calibrated current meter is used. Current meter calibration is carried out in accordance with specific standard in calibration laboratories. To evaluate the performance and health of a current meter, one should compares velocity and heading it with a velocity and heading reference. In this paper, the innovative method for evaluate velocity and heading resulted from impeller marine current meter is presented. In this method, current meter is to be attached to buoy that is installed on it tow GNSS receivers; and by towing it in a lake, simultaneous velocity and heading of the current meter are recorded. Also data position of buoy by GNSS is recorded. Accurately calculated velocity and heading of buoy by using GNSS data to be used as a criterion to evaluate the current meter velocity and heading. Finally, the calibration equation that is known as the final result of the calibration process was determined for velocity and heading of current meter with reasonable accuracy. Also, current meter is tested in this paper evaluated commercial method in calibration laboratory. The results were compared with the results of the proposed method. The results indicated the success of the GNSS-based method for the Performance analysis of a marine current meter.
The Risk Assessment of Dam Construction Projects Using Fuzzy TOPSIS (Case Study: Alavian Earth Dam) Sina Shaffiee Haghshenas; Mir Ahmad Lashteh Neshaei; Pouyan Pourkazem; Sami Shaffiee Haghshenas
Civil Engineering Journal Vol 2, No 4 (2016): April
Publisher : Salehan Institute of Higher Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (436.661 KB) | DOI: 10.28991/cej-2016-00000022

Abstract

One of the appropriate tools for conducting a successful project is the risk management during the implementation of the project. Dam construction projects are complex projects with high impact factors such as variable and uncertain conditions. To identify the risks of project, experts' experiences and comments including mind storm and consultation sessions were used. Risk analysis is a complex issue. Therefore, in this paper, the fuzzy multiple criteria decision making (FMCDM) technique was used to rank the risk which is a powerful and effective tool in solving complex problems under uncertain and implicit conditions. Due to the uncertainty in the language, fuzzy data were used for the quantitative analysis of the probability and severity of effects and the repetition of risks taken into account. The present research was conducted on Alavian dam in the northeast of Iran. Due to the result of the study, design mistakes' risk (R4) has the highest level of risk and earthquake, etc. has the lowest level of risk in Alavian dam project.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5


Filter by Year

2016 2016


Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 9, No 9 (2023): September Vol 9, No 8 (2023): August Vol 9, No 7 (2023): July Vol 9, No 6 (2023): June Vol 9, No 5 (2023): May Vol 9, No 4 (2023): April Vol 9, No 3 (2023): March Vol 9, No 2 (2023): February Vol 9, No 1 (2023): January Vol 9 (2023): Special Issue "Innovative Strategies in Civil Engineering Grand Challenges" Vol 8, No 12 (2022): December Vol 8, No 11 (2022): November Vol 8, No 10 (2022): October Vol 8, No 9 (2022): September Vol 8, No 8 (2022): August Vol 8, No 7 (2022): July Vol 8, No 6 (2022): June Vol 8, No 5 (2022): May Vol 8, No 4 (2022): April Vol 8, No 3 (2022): March Vol 8, No 2 (2022): February Vol 8, No 1 (2022): January Vol 7, No 12 (2021): December Vol 7, No 11 (2021): November Vol 7, No 10 (2021): October Vol 7, No 9 (2021): September Vol 7, No 8 (2021): August Vol 7, No 7 (2021): July Vol 7, No 6 (2021): June Vol 7, No 5 (2021): May Vol 7, No 4 (2021): April Vol 7, No 3 (2021): March Vol 7, No 2 (2021): February Vol 7, No 1 (2021): January Vol 7 (2021): Special Issue "Innovative Strategies in Civil Engineering Grand Challenges" Vol 6, No 12 (2020): December Vol 6, No 11 (2020): November Vol 6, No 10 (2020): October Vol 6, No 9 (2020): September Vol 6, No 8 (2020): August Vol 6, No 7 (2020): July Vol 6, No 6 (2020): June Vol 6, No 5 (2020): May Vol 6, No 4 (2020): April Vol 6, No 3 (2020): March Vol 6, No 2 (2020): February Vol 6, No 1 (2020): January Vol 6 (2020): Special Issue "Emerging Materials in Civil Engineering" Vol 5, No 12 (2019): December Vol 5, No 11 (2019): November Vol 5, No 10 (2019): October Vol 5, No 9 (2019): September Vol 5, No 8 (2019): August Vol 5, No 7 (2019): July Vol 5, No 6 (2019): June Vol 5, No 6 (2019): June Vol 5, No 5 (2019): May Vol 5, No 4 (2019): April Vol 5, No 4 (2019): April Vol 5, No 3 (2019): March Vol 5, No 3 (2019): March Vol 5, No 2 (2019): February Vol 5, No 2 (2019): February Vol 5, No 1 (2019): January Vol 5, No 1 (2019): January Vol 4, No 12 (2018): December Vol 4, No 12 (2018): December Vol 4, No 11 (2018): November Vol 4, No 11 (2018): November Vol 4, No 10 (2018): October Vol 4, No 10 (2018): October Vol 4, No 9 (2018): September Vol 4, No 9 (2018): September Vol 4, No 8 (2018): August Vol 4, No 8 (2018): August Vol 4, No 7 (2018): July Vol 4, No 7 (2018): July Vol 4, No 6 (2018): June Vol 4, No 6 (2018): June Vol 4, No 5 (2018): May Vol 4, No 5 (2018): May Vol 4, No 4 (2018): April Vol 4, No 4 (2018): April Vol 4, No 3 (2018): March Vol 4, No 3 (2018): March Vol 4, No 2 (2018): February Vol 4, No 2 (2018): February Vol 4, No 1 (2018): January Vol 4, No 1 (2018): January Vol 3, No 12 (2017): December Vol 3, No 12 (2017): December Vol 3, No 11 (2017): November Vol 3, No 11 (2017): November Vol 3, No 10 (2017): October Vol 3, No 10 (2017): October Vol 3, No 9 (2017): September Vol 3, No 9 (2017): September Vol 3, No 8 (2017): August Vol 3, No 7 (2017): July Vol 3, No 7 (2017): July Vol 3, No 6 (2017): June Vol 3, No 5 (2017): May Vol 3, No 5 (2017): May Vol 3, No 4 (2017): April Vol 3, No 3 (2017): March Vol 3, No 2 (2017): February Vol 3, No 2 (2017): February Vol 3, No 1 (2017): January Vol 2, No 12 (2016): December Vol 2, No 12 (2016): December Vol 2, No 11 (2016): November Vol 2, No 11 (2016): November Vol 2, No 10 (2016): October Vol 2, No 9 (2016): September Vol 2, No 9 (2016): September Vol 2, No 8 (2016): August Vol 2, No 8 (2016): August Vol 2, No 7 (2016): July Vol 2, No 7 (2016): July Vol 2, No 6 (2016): June Vol 2, No 6 (2016): June Vol 2, No 5 (2016): May Vol 2, No 4 (2016): April Vol 2, No 3 (2016): March Vol 2, No 3 (2016): March Vol 2, No 2 (2016): February Vol 2, No 1 (2016): January Vol 1, No 2 (2015): December Vol 1, No 1 (2015): November More Issue