Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Legalitas
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Legalitas (JPHL) is published duo-annually in May and November, and aimed to provide research articles in order to have a significant implication to the world of law. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Legalitas (JPHL) provides cutting-edge and comprehensive analysis of gap between theory and practice as well as the significant implications of the legal world. The scope of this journal has become essential for criminal law, civil, constitutional and international law. The Journal is highly relevant to all professionals, directors, managers, entrepreneurs, professors, academic researchers and graduate students in the field of Law studies.
Articles
47 Documents
<![CDATA[Penyelesaian Sengketa Pajak melalui Keberatan dan Banding ]]>
<![CDATA[Khalimi Khalimi]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Legalitas Vol 11, No 1 (2017) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Jayabaya ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (537.08 KB)
|
DOI: 10.31479/jphl.v11i1.137
<![CDATA[The purpose of this study is to identify the possibility of the parties to the dispute in an effort to win the tax dispute case. Analysis of the parties to the dispute in winning the tax dispute case is expected to identify the taxpayer. This study uses juridical normative research with the approach of this research law to examine efforts to resolve tax disputes in Indonesia. The results of this study found that an alternative tax dispute resolution is needed to resolve the above problems, such as mediation of tax disputes conducted by an independent party. Therefore, the researcher suggests that it is necessary to create a Tax Dispute Resolution and Mediation Institution which is a non-ministerial government agency whose duty is to handle complaints and be an independent mediator of the tax dispute between the taxpayer and the Directorate General of Taxes.]]>
<![CDATA[Politik Hukum Penerapan Diversi Pada Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak Untuk Mewujudkan Keadilan Restoratif ]]>
<![CDATA[Dhoni Martien]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Legalitas Vol 11, No 1 (2017) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Jayabaya ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (335.751 KB)
|
DOI: 10.31479/jphl.v11i1.138
<![CDATA[Restorative Justice and Diversity which are intended to avoid and keep children away from the judicial process so as to avoid stigmatization of children in conflict with the law and are expected to return children to the social environment naturally. The research method used in this study is normative juridical using three approaches, namely the statutory approach, conceptual approach, and historical approach. The data source used is secondary data, which consists of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. As a knife analysis, researchers use the Legal System Theory as Grand Theory, Authority Theory as Middle Range Theory, Criminal Theory as Applied Theory. The results of this study found that The application of diversion in the juvenile justice system in Indonesia, in realizing restorative justice in the court has been carried out, based on Government Regulation Number 65 of 2015 concerning Government Regulation Guidelines for the Implementation of Diversity and Handling of Children who are not yet 12 (Twelve) Years Old. Political Law that must be taken by the Government is amending Government Regulation Number 65 of 2015 concerning guidelines for implementing diversion and handling children who are not yet 12 years old, by adding provisions governing Special Investigators, Special Public Prosecutors and Special Judges, who handle diversion in the justice system child.]]>
<![CDATA[Hak Angket Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia Sebagai Fungsi Pengawasan Lembaga Negara ]]>
<![CDATA[Kristiawanto Kristiawanto]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Legalitas Vol 14, No 1 (2020) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Jayabaya ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31479/jphl.v14i2.142
<![CDATA[This study aims to examine that the fundamental problem is the use of the inquiry right of the House of Representatives of the Republic of Indonesia to the Corruption Eradication Commission. The research method used is the normative juridical legal research type, the researcher uses four approaches, namely the statute approach, the case approach, the conceptual approach and the comparative approach. The legal materials used in this study are primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. Procedures for collecting legal materials based on problem topics that have been formulated in the formulation of the problem and reviewed and analyzed. Whereas the processing and analysis of legal materials by describing and linking them in such a way that they are presented in systematized writing. The results found that the Authority through the functions are clearly given by the right of inquiry is the right of Parliament to conduct an investigation into the implementation of a law and/or policy of the Government with regard to the important things, strategically, and have broad impact on society, nation, and state allegedly contrary to statutory regulations. The mechanism for using the DPR’s inquiry rights against the KPK can be concluded that the KPK is the subject of the DPR’s inquiry right in its supervisory function.]]>
<![CDATA[Implementasi Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 5 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pidana Tambahan Uang Pengganti Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi ]]>
<![CDATA[Taufik Yanuar Chandra]]>;
<![CDATA[Indik Rusmono]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Legalitas Vol 14, No 1 (2020) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Jayabaya ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31479/jphl.v14i1.143
<![CDATA[This study aims to examine that the Corruption Eradication Act, there are difficulties or obstacles in knowing the amount of funds from the results of criminal acts of corruption. Therefore, the Supreme Court issued a guideline in the Supreme Court Regulation Number 5 of 2014 concerning Criminal Additional Substitution in the Case of Corruption Crime. The provisions of the Supreme Court Regulation are intended to complement the weaknesses and shortcomings of the provisions of Article 18 of Law Number 31 of 1999 jo. Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Eradication of Corruption. This study uses normative data with primary and secondary law data sources. Data collection techniques in this study are observation, documentation and literature study. The data collected is analyzed qualitatively. Found that the execution of substitute money based on a decision that has legal force remains contained in Article 9 of the Republic of Indonesia Supreme Court Regulation Number 5 of 2014. The results of the auction of state booty, according to Article 9 of the Regulation of the Minister of Finance Number 03 / PMK.06 / 2011 governing the handling of state spoils, aregiven full power to the service office to deposit into the state treasury as Non-Tax State Revenue in the form of general acceptance of the Prosecutor’s Office within 3 (three) months and can be extended for a maximum of 1 (one) month]]>
<![CDATA[Upaya Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Terpidana Tindak Pidana Korupsi Sebagai Upaya Pengembalian Kerugian Negara ]]>
<![CDATA[Josua Nainggolan]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Legalitas Vol 15, No 1 (2021) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Jayabaya ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31479/jphl.v15i1.204
<![CDATA[Upaya pemulihan aset hasil curian akibat tindak pidana korupsi selalu bukan pekerjaan yang mudah. Hal ini dikarenakan para pelaku korupsi memiliki banyak akses yang luas dan sulit dijangkau dalam hal persembunyian atau pencucian uang. Pengembalian aset hasil curian hasil korupsi semakin sulit dilakukan karena yang disebut save haven telah melewati batas wilayah negara dan sebagai kejahatan terorganisir, bahkan korupsi seringkali melibatkan korporasi sebagai pelakunya. Metode penelitian menggunakan model hukum normatif. Sumber data dalam penelitian ini adalah data sekunder. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan menggunakan studi kepustakaan dan wawancara, sedangkan teknik analisis data yang digunakan adalah metode normatif kualitatif. Hasil penelitian ini adalah pengaturan dan kedudukan jaksa dalam upaya pengembalian kekayaan negara akibat tindak pidana korupsi memegang peranan yang sangat penting. Jaksa sebagai pengacara negara memiliki peran untuk menegakkan hukum dengan mengajukan gugatan atau permohonan ke Pengadilan di bidang sipil sebagaimana diatur oleh peraturan perundangundangan dalam rangka menjaga ketertiban hukum, dan melindungi kepentingan negara dan pemerintah serta sipil hak rakyat]]>
<![CDATA[Cyberbullying dan Tantangan Hukum ]]>
<![CDATA[Citasari Jayaputri]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Legalitas Vol 14, No 1 (2020) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Jayabaya ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31479/jphl.v14i1.202
<![CDATA[Pertanggungjawaban pidana terhadap pelaku cyberbullying hingga kini belum memiliki batas yang tegas, sebab tidak semua perilaku antisosial ini menjadi masalah hukum. Cyberbullying sebagai suatu perilaku antisosial, dapat ditinjau dari beberapa aspek seperti kriminologi, viktimologi, psikologi dan psikiatri. Dengan menggunakan teknologi secara kontinyu dapat mengindikasikan bahwa cyberbullying dapat menjadi masalah terus-menerus yang pada akhirnya dapat melampaui bentuk tradisional bullying. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode yuridis normatif. Teknik pengumpulan data dalam penelitian ini menggunakan studi kepustakaan (library research). Teknik analisis data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah analisis kualitatif normatif dengan menggabungkan penalaran induksi dan deduksi. Hasil penelitian menemukan bahwa ada berbagai jenis cyberbullying yang meliputi flaming, pelecehan, peniruan identitas, penyebaran dan tipu daya, pengucilan dan pengucilan, fitnah, fitnah, cyberstalking. Pengalaman bullying tradisional dan cyberbullying dikaitkan dengan sejumlah hasil negatif bagi korban dan pelaku dalam hal kesehatan psikologis dan fisik, fungsi sosial, dan perilaku. Ketentuan Cyberbullying terdapat pada KUHP dan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik.]]>
<![CDATA[Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Illegal Minyak Dan Gas Bumi Oleh Nakhoda/Crew Kapal Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Aditya Rezeki Ramadhan]]>;
<![CDATA[Joko Sriwidodo]]>;
<![CDATA[Kristiawanto Kristiawanto]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Legalitas Vol 15, No 1 (2021) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Jayabaya ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31479/jphl.v15i1.206
<![CDATA[Business activities in the oil and gas sector that violate the laws and regulations in the oil and gas sector. Especially carried out by the captain / crew of tankers or other types of ships such as tugboats, cargo, SPOB and others. The research method is juridical-normative. The source of data in this study is secondary data. Data collection was carried out using field research, while the data analysis technique used was normative juridical analysis, making it possible to produce conclusions regarding criminal law enforcement and criminal liability in the oil and gas sector carried out by the captain/ship crew. Based on research that legal sanctions perpetrators of criminal acts in the field of Oil and Gas have not been able to make a major contribution in order to suppress or eliminate or hinder acts of law violations in the field of Oil and Gas, because there are still many legal loopholes from the Regulations and Legislation created by the Government. Therefore, the management of oil and gas must be improved comprehensively and thoroughly in one law and it is not sufficient if it is only partially regulated in the Job Creation Law so there needs to be a comprehensive overhaul of the new law]]>
<![CDATA[Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak Indonesia Berkaitan Penjatuhan Pidana Terhadap Anak ]]>
<![CDATA[Dio Alberto Sirait]]>;
<![CDATA[Mohamad Ismed]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Legalitas Vol 15, No 1 (2021) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Jayabaya ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31479/jphl.v15i1.212
<![CDATA[This research is intended to review “Criminal Imposition of Children in the Indonesian Child Criminal Justice System”. The imposition of a crime against a child will traumatize the child, and can have an impact on his life. Children should also be seen as a valuable asset of a nation and state in the future whose rights must be protected and protected. This is because after all in the hands of the children the progress of a nation will be determined. The more modern a country, the greater his attention in creating a conducive situation for developing children in the framework of protection. The research method is carried out in a normative juridical method based on positive law (dogmatics) to examine and review secondary data that refers to law or regulations with other applicable regulations. This research includes research on the actions of delinquency carried out by children is a manifestation of adolescent inflability without any intention of detrimental to others as shown in a crime that is listed in the Criminal Code (KUHP) where the perpetrators must be aware of the consequences and His actions and the perpetrators were able to be responsible for his actions. Thus, then, it is not right when the child’s delinquency is considered a pure crime.]]>
<![CDATA[Kewenangan Kementerian Dalam Negeri Dalam Pembubaran Organisasi Kemasyarakatan Dengan Berlakunya UndangUndang Nomor 16 Tahun 2017 ]]>
<![CDATA[Detri Nita Sari]]>;
<![CDATA[Agung Makbul]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Legalitas Vol 15, No 2 (2021) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Jayabaya ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31479/jphl.v15i2.213
<![CDATA[The pros and cons of the dissolution of civil society organizations have been an ongoing issue since the emergence of Law Number 16 of 2017 concerning Social Organizations, where there was a debate about how these Community Organizations should be dissolved. The approach method used in this research is the method of juridical analysis approach. The research specifications used in this research are descriptive-analytical. Legal data materials obtained from both the literature and field research were analyzed qualitatively, namely the data analysis method by conducting a selection of the data obtained based on their quality and truth and those related to the problems to be discussed. Based on the results of the study, it was found that the authority of the Ministry of Home Affairs in the mechanism for dissolution of community organizations in Indonesia is based on Law Number 16 of 2017 concerning Stipulation of Government Regulation in Lieu of Law Number 2 of 2017 concerning Amendments to Law Number 17 of 2013 concerning Community Organizations into Law, Article 62 which explains that for Community Organizations committing violations given a written warning once within seven working days from the date the warning was issued. In the event that the Community Organizations does not comply with the written warning within a predetermined period of time, the Minister who carries out government affairs in the fields of law and human rights in accordance with his authority shall impose sanctions on the termination of activities]]>
<![CDATA[Keabsahan Surat Keputusan Bersama Untuk Penyidikan Perkara Koneksitas Pasca Perubahan Ketatanegaraan Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Hedwig Adianto Mau]]>;
<![CDATA[Ramlani Lina Sinaulan]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Legalitas Vol 15, No 1 (2021) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Jayabaya ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31479/jphl.v15i1.219
<![CDATA[ This study aims at post-reformation there has been a change in the state administration where the listed institutions have been independently separated, the judiciary is under the authority of the Supreme Court, the Ministry of Defense and Security has been separated into the Ministry of Defense, the Indonesian National Army and the National Police, and the Indonesian Attorney General’s Office which is independent. The problem that is studied is how the validity of the Joint Decree is, with normative juridical research methods as a means of discussion and supported by a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. This study concludes that the existence of a Joint Decree is no longer relevant because the officials who issue it do not have the authority anymore based on the laws and regulations. Thus, the Joint Decree must be revised by involving four related institutions, namely; The Supreme Court, the Indonesian National Armed Forces, the National Police, and the Indonesian Attorney General’s Office.]]>
