cover
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
jurnal.sosek.kehutanan@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl. Gunung Batu No.5 Bogor 16118 Indonesia
Location
Kota bogor,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan
ISSN : 19796013     EISSN : 25024221     DOI : https://doi.org/10.20886/jpsek
Core Subject : Economy, Social,
Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan telah terakreditasi berdasarkan Keputusan Kepala LIPI No.818/E/2015. Jurnal ini memuat karya tulis ilmiah dari hasil - hasil penelitian di bidang sosial. ekonomi, dan lingkungan kehutanan yang meliputi aspek: sosial ekonomi kemasyarakatan, sosiologi kehutanan, politik dan ekonomi kehutanan, studi kemasyarakatan, kebijakan lingkungan, ekonomi kehutanan/sumber daya hutan, ekonomi sumber daya alam, ekonomi pertanian, ekonomi ekoturisme, furniture value chain, kehutanan masyarakat, kebijakan kehutanan, kebijakan publik, perubahan iklim, ekologi dan manajemen lanskap, konservasi sumberdaya alam, kebakaran hutan dan lahan, global climate change, konservasi tanah dan air, agroklimatologi dan lingkungan, mitigasi REDD+, adaptasi perubahan iklim. Terbit pertama kali tahun 2001, terakreditasi tahun 2006 dengan nomor 60/Akred-LIPI/P2MBI/12/2006. Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan terbit dengan frekuensi tiga kali dalam setahun (April, Agustus, Desember). Jurnal ini diterbitkan oleh Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Sosial, Ekonomi, Kebijakan dan Perubahan Iklim, Badan Penelitian, Pengembangan dan Inovasi, Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan. Nama penerbit telah berubah karena penggabungan dari Kementerian Kehutanan dengan Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup, menjadi Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan, Republik Indonesia (Perpres No. 16/2015). Logo penerbit juga mengalami perubahan menyesuaikan Logo Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 5 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol 18, No 2 (2021): Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Ekonomi dan Kehutanan" : 5 Documents clear
ANALISIS KEBIJAKAN HUTAN RAKYAT KEMITRAAN YANG BERKELANJUTAN Mahawan Karuniasa; Niken Probo Laras
Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Vol 18, No 2 (2021): Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Ekonomi dan Kehutanan
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Sosial, Ekonomi, Kebijakan dan Perubahan Iklim

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20886/jpsek.2021.18.2.117-128

Abstract

Private forest partnership has been considered as a new strategy in dealing with conventional socio-economic model problem of the industrial wood raw material sustainability supply. As a new strategy to address the issue of sustainability of industrial wood supply, synergy is needed between forest farmer groups and timber-based industry through private forest partnership schemes. This research aims to analyze private forest partnership policy and its implementation in terms of cooperation aspects in order to formulate a sustainable private forest partnership policy. Content analysis was used to identify all policies related to private forestry partnerships, while policy implementation was analyzed by using formal evaluation method. The descriptive method was implemented to analyze standing stock managemet, and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) as a method to formulate the concept of sustainable private forest partnership policy. The results showed that private forest partnership policy now is more focused on production facilities and infrastructure aspect. The level of policy implementation in research location is at a low grade, only reached 16.28%, while 43.75% of the private forest partnerships in the research area are not sustainable due to low potential of standing stock. This research proved that fostering the farmers is a key factor to develop sustainable private forest partnership policy.
PERSEPSI MASYARAKAT TERHADAP KONFLIK MACAN TUTUL JAWA DENGAN WARGA SEKITAR SUAKA MARGASATWA GUNUNG SAWAL Andina Agustia Dewanti; Hero Marhaento
Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Vol 18, No 2 (2021): Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Ekonomi dan Kehutanan
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Sosial, Ekonomi, Kebijakan dan Perubahan Iklim

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20886/jpsek.2021.18.2.75-85

Abstract

Mount Sawal Wildlife Reserve is known as one of the places that has the highest number of conflict cases between Javan leopard and human in Indonesia. There were 38 conflict cases recorded in the period of 2001-2016 with the highest number of cases occurring in Kertamandala and Cikupa Villages, Ciamis District, West Java. This study assessed the community perception of those two villages towards the conflict by using Q-method in combination with the R-Studio statistics to analyze the data. There were 19 participants who were tested with 16 consent statements called Q-sorting were ranked based on approval scale. The results showed that the community perceptions of conflict can be grouped into three, namely: 1) the importance to preserve the existence of javan leopards, 2) wildlife conflict management is a shared responsibility between communities and authorities, and 3) in the future, wildlife conflicts must not take place again. In addition, all participants shared consensus that the community do not accept the existence of javan leopard in their village area and they also agreed that conservation authorities have taken actions to deal with the conflict.
PERSEPSI MASYARAKAT HUKUM ADAT TERHADAP KEBERADAAN HUTAN DI KASEPUHAN KARANG DAN CISUNGSANG, KABUPATEN LEBAK, BANTEN Surati Surati; Sylviani Sylviani; Niken Sakuntaladewi; Dian Charity Hidayat; Kuncoro Ariawan
Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Vol 18, No 2 (2021): Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Ekonomi dan Kehutanan
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Sosial, Ekonomi, Kebijakan dan Perubahan Iklim

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20886/jpsek.2021.18.2.99-115

Abstract

The existence of customary territories, which are generally located in forest areas, create a separate conflict. One solution is the granting of customary forest management rights to customary law communities (CLC), and there are common understanding and perception between community and forest area managers. The study aims to understand perceptions of CLC about their needs and interests in forests. The research was conducted in Kasepuhan Karang and Cisungsang. Research method is descriptive qualitative. Data processing was done in a tabulated form and analyzed descriptively. The results showed that the perceptions of CLC Kasepuhan Karang and Cisungsang on customary forest management in terms of social, economic, and ecological aspects were generally positive, and that the condition of the Kasepuhan Karang forest is better. It was found that the ranges from social aspects are 45%-95%, economic aspects are 39%-100%, and ecological aspects are75%-100%. They depend on the forest as a source of life, medicines, and handicraft materials. Forests are also a place for customary rituals, a source of food, a source of water that is preserved and passed down from generation to generation. Customary institutions need to be strengthened with the active participation of traditional elders or the younger generation, so that future generations understand and inherit customary culture values.
PEMETAAN POSISI KEUNGGULAN EKOWISATA BEE JAY BAKAU RESORT Mochammad Fattah; Candra Adi Intyas; Tiwi Nurjannati Utami; Dwi Sofiati; Kartika Intan Abdillah
Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Vol 18, No 2 (2021): Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Ekonomi dan Kehutanan
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Sosial, Ekonomi, Kebijakan dan Perubahan Iklim

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20886/jpsek.2021.18.2.129-139

Abstract

Bee Jay Bakau Resort (BJBR) is one of the main tourist destinations in Probolinggo City that utilizes the mangrove ecosystem. The study aims to analyze the advantages position mapping of BJBR. The study uses correlational approach with accidental sampling of 70 respondents. Data were analyzed by using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and correspondence analysis (CA) with 16 attributes. This study assessed three mangrove ecotourism sites in East Java. The main factors that influence tourists visiting BJBR are tourist attractions, prices, tourism completeness and safety, mangrove preservation, as well as service friendliness. BJBR has tourism advantages in the form of complete facilities and completeness of its attractions. Meanwhile, the advantages of Wonorejo Surabaya mangrove ecotourism are among others: the availability of education related to mangroves and the cleanliness of the facilities. On the other side, The Clungup Mangrove Conservation Malang has the advantages in the form of mangrove conservation, tourism beauty, tourism memories, and tourism safety. BJBR managers need to improve the sustainability of the mangrove forest ecosystem and educational facilities regarding the benefits of mangroves in order to have a positive impact on tourists.
PENGARUH KOMPETENSI PETANI TERHADAP KELESTARIAN HASIL DAN USAHA HUTAN RAKYAT JATI DI KABUPATEN MUNA, SULAWESI TENGGARA Musdi Musdi
Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Vol 18, No 2 (2021): Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Ekonomi dan Kehutanan
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Sosial, Ekonomi, Kebijakan dan Perubahan Iklim

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20886/jpsek.2021.18.2.87-98

Abstract

Farm forestry is one form of farming business developed by the community in Muna District. Farm forestry businesses are expected to provide product for supporting farmer economic condition. Sustainable farm forestry management must be supported by competent farmers. Farmer’s competencies consisting of knowledge, skills, attitudes, and actions have not been identified, therefore it is necessary to conduct an assessment to determine their performance in order to maintain and improve the yield and business of farm forestry. This study aims to analyze the relationship between farmer competence and the sustainability of farm forestry product and business. Data collection was taken by using purposive sampling. Data analysis uses Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) which is operated by the Linear Structural Relationship (LISREL) program. Farm forestry business is not a main livelihood for the community which makes the farmers’ income does not depend on their farm forestry earnings. The results of this study indicate that the competency of farm forestry farmers and its several influencing factors have a significant impact on farm forestry sustainable management, especially in terms of product and business sustainability.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5


Filter by Year

2021 2021


Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 19, No 1 (2022): Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Vol 18, No 3 (2021): Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Vol 18, No 2 (2021): Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Ekonomi dan Kehutanan Vol 18, No 1 (2021): Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Vol 17, No 3 (2020): Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Vol 17, No 2 (2020): Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Vol 17, No 1 (2020): Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Vol 16, No 3 (2019): Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Vol 16, No 2 (2019): Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Vol 16, No 1 (2019): Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Vol 15, No 3 (2018): Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Vol 15, No 2 (2018): Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Vol 15, No 1 (2018): Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Vol 14, No 3 (2017): Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Vol 14, No 2 (2017): Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Vol 14, No 1 (2017): Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Vol 13, No 3 (2016): Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Vol 13, No 2 (2016): Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Vol 13, No 1 (2016): Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Vol 12, No 3 (2015): Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Vol 12, No 2 (2015): Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Vol 12, No 1 (2015): Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Vol 11, No 4 (2014): Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Vol 11, No 3 (2014): Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Vol 11, No 2 (2014): Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Vol 11, No 1 (2014): Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Vol 10, No 4 (2013): Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Vol 10, No 3 (2013): Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Vol 10, No 2 (2013): Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Vol 10, No 1 (2013): Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Vol 9, No 4 (2012): Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Vol 9, No 3 (2012): Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Vol 9, No 2 (2012): Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Vol 9, No 1 (2012): Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Vol 8, No 4 (2011): Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Vol 8, No 3 (2011): Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Vol 8, No 2 (2011): Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Vol 8, No 1 (2011): Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Vol 7, No 4 (2010): Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Vol 7, No 3 (2010): Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Vol 7, No 2 (2010): Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Vol 7, No 1 (2010): Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Vol 6, No 2 (2009): Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Vol 6, No 1 (2009): Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Vol 5, No 4 (2008): Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Vol 5, No 3 (2008): Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Vol 5, No 2 (2008): Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Vol 5, No 1 (2008): Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Vol 4, No 4 (2007): Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Vol 4, No 3 (2007): Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Vol 4, No 2 (2007): Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Vol 4, No 1 (2007): Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Vol 3, No 3 (2006): Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Vol 3, No 2 (2006): Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Vol 3, No 1 (2006): Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Vol 2, No 4 (2005): Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Vol 2, No 3 (2005): Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Vol 2, No 2 (2005): Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Vol 2, No 1 (2005): Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Vol 1, No 1 (2004): Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Kehutanan More Issue