cover
Contact Name
Marthsian Y. Anakotta
Contact Email
marthsiananakotta@ukdc.ac.id
Phone
+6231-5946482
Journal Mail Official
jurnalsev@ukdc.ac.id
Editorial Address
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Katolik Darma Cendika Lantai 4 Gedung Vidya Loka, Ruang VL 4K Jl. Dr. Ir. H. Soekarno 201, Surabaya 60117
Location
Kota surabaya,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Sapientia Et Virtus
ISSN : 2355343X     EISSN : 27162273     DOI : 10.37477
Core Subject : Social,
Tujuan jurnal ini adalah menyediakan tempat bagi akademisi, peneliti dan praktisi untuk menerbitkan artikel penelitian asli atau artikel ulasan. Ruang lingkup artikel yang diterbitkan dalam jurnal ini membahas berbagai topik, termasuk berbagai pendekatan untuk studi hukum seperti perbandingan hukum, hukum dan ekonomi, sosiologi hukum, dan antropologi hukum. Artikel juga dapat membahas bidang hukum yang spesifik, misalnya: hukum pidana, hukum perdata, hukum komersial dan bisnis, hukum internasional, hukum konstitusional, hukum administrasi, hukum adat, dan hukum sumber daya alam.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 5 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol 3 No 1 (2018): March" : 5 Documents clear
Rekonstruksi Pengaturan Kampanye Legislatif Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 M. Nashrulloh Akbar
SAPIENTIA ET VIRTUS Vol 3 No 1 (2018): March
Publisher : Darma Cendika Catholic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37477/sev.v3i1.175

Abstract

One of the significant piece of election is the campaign conducted by the election participants. To achieve an integrated election, the campaign must guarantee the free and fair principles and legal certainty. This research looks to how the regulation works as a reference to campaign implementation. The emergence of election law 7 Tahun 2017 is expected to cover the weakness of previous legilslation 8 Tahun 2012. Evidently, the regulations can not guarantee the legal certainty on campaign implementation that caused many problems in its aplication. Therefore the reconstruction of regulation must be carried out in order to create free and fair competition for elections with integrity.
Mendudukkan Lingkup Pemantauan Dan Evaluasi Peraturan Daerah Oleh Dewan Perwakilan Daerah Triya Indra Rahmawan
SAPIENTIA ET VIRTUS Vol 3 No 1 (2018): March
Publisher : Darma Cendika Catholic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37477/sev.v3i1.176

Abstract

Upon the enactment of Law No 2 in 2018, the Regional Representative Council has been given a new authority and task to monitor and evaluate the Local Regulations. The establishment of the new authority and task has provided a challenge for the Regional Representative Council in determining the scope of monitoring and evaluation. Overlap of functions might occur because the central government is also responsible for supervising the Local Regulations. Therefore, the Regional Representative Council should be able to spot the differences in the Local Regulations supervised by the legislative or executive councils. To avoid overlapping authorities, the monitoring and evaluation scope should be focused on formulating problems that are faced by the local government in planning, preparing, and implementing the Local Regulations. These results will, thus, be established in a form of a policy recommendation for preparing materials contained in a local autonomy law.
Hak Pengemudi Bus Perusahaan Angkutan Jalan Perum Damri Surabaya Terkait Jam Kerja Doel Susanto
SAPIENTIA ET VIRTUS Vol 3 No 1 (2018): March
Publisher : Darma Cendika Catholic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37477/sev.v3i1.177

Abstract

The working time of the bus driver as implied by Article 90 paragraph (4) of Law Number 22 of 2009 on Road Traffic and Transportation, is not in sync with Law Number 13 of 2003 concerning Labor because based on the principle of lex specialis derogat legi generali, the status of Perum Damri Surabaya as a type of work engaged in certain business sectors or occupations and the type and nature of work carried out continuously. This affects the wages earned by bus drivers in the form of basic wages and overtime pay. The government has not specifically regulated the provisions of overtime drivers' wages, so that by Law Number 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower and Article 12 of the Decree of the Minister of Manpower and Transmigration of the Republic of Indonesia Number KEP. 102 / MEN / VI / 2004 concerning Overtime and Overtime Working Time shall be submitted to Perum Damri Surabaya to regulate overtime pay. This has potential violations in the payment of overtime wages, so a regulation that specifically regulates the bus driver's overtime wages.
Kewenangan Ombudsman Dalam Penyelesaian Pengaduan Pelayanan Publik Eufemia Lawati Salabbaet
SAPIENTIA ET VIRTUS Vol 3 No 1 (2018): March
Publisher : Darma Cendika Catholic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37477/sev.v3i1.178

Abstract

To prevent maladministration a special institution has been formed to handle maladministration in public services, namely the Ombudsman. The Ombudsman is authorized to process complaints from the public, including adjudication. The authority of the Ombudsman through the adjudication channel becomes a contradiction because the adjudication decision is not final and does not bind the parties, because the adjudication decision has only value as a recommendation. Based on the duties and authorities given to the Ombudsman, the process of resolving complaints of public services by the Ombudsman is the settlement of maladministration reported by the public and settlement of maladministration on its own initiative. The adjudication decision by the Ombudsman also does not provide legal certainty for the parties. Article 1 paragraph (11) of Law No. 25 of 2009 concerning Public Services needs to be changed by placing the adjudication process as the initial litigation process. Then it is necessary to change in Article 1 paragraph (7) of Law No. 37 of 2008 concerning the Ombudsman that the recommendation became one of the points in the dictum of the court's ruling.
Intervensi Pemerintah Dalam Perjanjian Jual Beli Tanah Dan/Atau Bangunan Melalui PP No 34 Tahun 2016 Ayu Dwi Novitasari
SAPIENTIA ET VIRTUS Vol 3 No 1 (2018): March
Publisher : Darma Cendika Catholic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37477/sev.v3i1.179

Abstract

Tax is the largest income for the state, but through Government Regulation no. 34 Year 2016 by lowering the tax for the seller does not necessarily relieve the taxation charge on the sector of sale and purchase of land and / or building, the sale and purchase of land and / or building is an agreement between the parties to buy immovable property (land and / or building ). As a form of freedom of contract can the government restrict and intervene the agreement through its legal products. For that reason, the research is conducted with normative juridical because it aims to know the limits of government to intervene on the sale and purchase agreement of land and/or building through Government Regulation 34 of 2016 which is inconsistent with BPHTB Law and knows the limits of freedom of contract in the land and / or building purchase agreement on Government Regulation no. 34 Year 2016. Because as a form of implementation of the principle of self assessment then the Government serves as a counterweight of freedom of contract if there is a market failure to avoid natural monopoly.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5