cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Dr. Otih Rostiana
Contact Email
otihrostiana@gmail.com
Phone
+62251-8321879
Journal Mail Official
buletintro@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Buletin Penelitian Tanaman Rempah dan Obat (BUL LITTRO) Editorial Office : Indonesian Spices and Medicinal Crops Research Institute (ISMCRI) Jl. Tentara Pelajar No. 3 Bogor, Indonesia 16111 Telp. (0251) 8321879, Fax. (0251) 8327010 E mail : buletintro@gmail.com
Location
Kota bogor,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Buletin Penelitian Tanaman Rempah dan Obat
Published by Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Perkebunan
ISSN : 02150824     EISSN : 25274414     DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.21082/
Core Subject : Agriculture,
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry
Focus and Scope Buletin Penelitian Tanaman Rempah dan Obat (BUL LITTRO) is a peer-reviewed and open access journal that publishes significant and important research finding on spice, medicinal, aromatic and industrial crops that have never been publish in any other scientific publications. Scopes of Buletin Penelitian Tanaman Rempah dan Obat are: Scope of science: Agricultural Microbiology, Agricultural Socio-Economics, Agronomy, Plant Biotechnology, Plant Breeding, Plant Protection, Plant Physiology, Soil Science, Seed Technology, Primary Post Harvest Scope of commodities : spice, medicinal, aromatic and industrial crops
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Pertanian dan Biologi (Semua) - Ilmu Pertanian dan Biologi (Lain-Lain)
Articles 5 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 29, No 2 (2018): Buletin Penelitian Tanaman Rempah dan Obat" : 5 Documents clear
The Variability of Crossbreed-cashew Accession Numbers at Two Years Age Based on Morphological Characters Wawan Haryudin; Otih Rostiana; Jajat Darajat
Buletin Penelitian Tanaman Rempah dan Obat Vol 29, No 2 (2018): Buletin Penelitian Tanaman Rempah dan Obat
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Perkebunan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21082/bullittro.v29n2.2018.79-92

Abstract

Cashew in cross-pollinated plants, one effort to improve the diversity gentik in germplasm of cashew nut was carried out by a cross between high-producing elders  and the elderly tolerant of helopeltis sp. The aimed of this study is to know the variability of 25 accession of cashew nut hybrid based on leaf morphology characters. The study was conducted at Cikampek Experimental Station, from January to December 2016, using direct observation method  the qualitative and quantitative morphological characters of the cashew at the age of two years. Observations were done on eight plants per plot, each observed as many as 50 leaves per plant. The result showed that the morphology character of cashew nut varied. Character of leaf ovatus, obovatus, and oblong The trunk and rounded ends, pointed and blunt. Form the edge of the leaf, form the bottom and top surfaces smooth leaves. The color of the adult leaves was dark green, and young leaves were reddish brown and  yellowish  green.  The  diversity  18.35-100 %  and  the level the closeness of 0.10-0.38, divided into two groups. Group one separated by characters a leaf shape  oblongus,  leaf  base  form  of the rotundatus, leaf tip shape rotundatus and obtusus and young leaves color BGB N199 A, group two separated by the characters of the leaf shape obovate, leaf base form of the obtusus, leaf tip shape acuminatus and retusus and young leaves color GB 200 B. The lenght of the leaf characters, the width of the leaf, the leaf thickness and the length of the petiole vary with the degree of diversity 47.67-96.94 % and the proximity distance 0.19-6.19 which is divided into teo groups. One group was separated by the the highest leaf length character 17.6-20.6 cm, whereas the two group was separated by the smallest leaf length character 14.6-17.1 cm.
Antioxidant Activity of Stem Bark Ethanolic Extracts of Calophyllum pulcherrimum, C. soulattri, and C. teysmannii Eris Septiana; Partomuan Simanjuntak
Buletin Penelitian Tanaman Rempah dan Obat Vol 29, No 2 (2018): Buletin Penelitian Tanaman Rempah dan Obat
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Perkebunan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21082/bullittro.v29n2.2018.59-68

Abstract

The decreased air quality due to severe pollution causes the formation of free radicals in the body. Antioxidants counteract free radicals compounds and are beneficial to health. Calophyllum plants is one of the natural antioxidants source. The study was aimed to determine the best antioxidant activity of ethanolic extracts of stem bark both single and combinations of three species of Calophyllum. The study was conducted from September to December 2017 at the Natural Product Chemistry Laboratory, Research Center for Biotechnology LIPI, Cibinong, West Java. The experiment consisted of seven treatments, repeated three times.  The treatments consisted of ethanolic stem bark extracts of a) C. pulcherrimum b) C. soulattri (CS), c) C. teysmannii (CT), d) combination of C. pulcherrimum and C. soulattri (CP+CS), e) combination of C. pulcherrimum and C. teysmannii (CP+CT), f) combination of C. soulattri and C. teysmannii (CS+CT), and g) combination of C. pulcherrimum, C. soulattri and C. teysmannii (CP+CS+CT) with the ratio of mixed extract was 1 : 1 for treatments with two combinations and 1 : 1 : 1 for three combinations. The antioxidant activity was evaluated using DPPH free radical scavenging  methods.  The  total  phenolic   and   flavonoids   content   assays   were conducted base on the reaction of follin-ciocalteu and aluminum chloride reagents respectively.  The results showed that combination of Calophyllum stem bark ethanolic extracts revealed higher antioxidant activity, total phenol and flavonoid content compared to its sole extract. CP+CS+CT treatment has the lowest IC50 value at 3.12 mg.l-1 so that it has the potential as a source of natural antioxidants.
The Potency Of Extract Tegining Ganang Leaf (Cassia Planisiqua Burm.f.) As Analgesic On Mice (Mus musculus L.) By Chemical And Hot Plate Induction Method Sister Sianturi; Amelia Febriani; Rahmi Syariifatul; Desy Satrana
Buletin Penelitian Tanaman Rempah dan Obat Vol 29, No 2 (2018): Buletin Penelitian Tanaman Rempah dan Obat
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Perkebunan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21082/bullittro.v29n2.2018.93-100

Abstract

Tegining ganang (Cassia planisiliqua) is an indigenous plant of Lombok, West Nusa Tenggara which has potentials to treat various diseases. Previous research showed that the plant has analgesic activity, but the results were still less satisfactory due to the low analgesic effectiveness (<50 %). This study aimed to examine the analgesic potential of tegining ganang leaf extract through chemical induction and hot plate induction methods. In vivo testing was conducted on male mice using those two methods to evaluate plant effectiveness as both a central and peripheral analgesic. Tegining ganang leaves collected from the village of Peresak, West Lombok, West Nusa Tenggara Province, were extracted in ethanol 70%. The treatments were extract dosages, viz. 200, 400, 800 mg.kg-1 body weight (BW) of mice. The positive control treatments for the chemical induction and hot plate induction methods were Acetosal and Tramadol, respectively. Meanwhile, the negative control treatment was Na CMC at 0.5%. The analgesic effectiveness of the extract in both chemical and hot plate induction methods was 50 %. The  optimum  effectiveness  for  chemical induction was at 800 mg.kg-1 body weight, whereas for hot plate induction was at 200 mg.kg-1 body weight. The results indicated that the ethanol extract of tegining ganang leaves was potential to be developed as an analgesic material.
The Response of Citronella Grass on Several NPKMg Fertlization Levels in Latosol Soil Type Setiawan, NFN; Gusmaini, NFN; Nurhayati, Hera
Buletin Penelitian Tanaman Rempah dan Obat Vol 29, No 2 (2018): Buletin Penelitian Tanaman Rempah dan Obat
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Perkebunan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21082/bullittro.v29n2.2018.69-78

Abstract

Citronella grass (Cymbopogon nardus var genuinus L) is an essential oil-producing plant known as "Citronella Oil of Java". Oil is resulted from leaf distillation. The fertilization of N, P, K and Mg was expected to enhance herb productivity and oil yield of citronella grass. The research was conducted at Cicurug Experimental Garden, Sukabumi from August 2016 - February 2017. The objective of this research was to determine the proper dosage of NPKMg fertilizer on citronella grass in Latosol soil type. The study was arranged in a Randomized Block Design with 6 fertilization treatments and 4 replications. Fertilizer treatments were (1) without fertilizer (control), (2) NPKMg (12:12:17:2): (2) at the dosage of 141 kg.ha-1,(3) 281 kg.ha-1, (4) 421 kg.ha-1, (5) 526 kg.ha-1, and (6) Urea 150 kg.ha-1, SP-36         50 kg.ha-1 and KCl 125 kg.ha-1 (as comparison). The NPKMg fertilization on citronella grass enhanced plant growth and increased the productivity of biomass and oil yield.  The application of NPKMg fertilization (12:12:17:2) 141 kg.ha-1 produced 23 tons of herbs, increased by 30.8 % compared to NPK fertilization without Mg. The dosage of NPKMg fertilizer (12-12-17-2) at 281 kg.ha-1 indicated the best growth and the highest herb production (24 ton.ha-1), increased by 39 %, while the highest oil content (1.4 %) was shown by 421 kg.ha-1 NPKMg (12-12-17-2) treatment, although the oil yield was insignificant compared to 281 kg.ha-1. Thus, the dosage of 281 kg.ha-1 NPKMg (12:12:17:2) can be recommended for citronella  grass cultivated at Latosol soil type
Effect of Rhizome Type to Viability, Growth, and Productivity of Three Turmeric Varieties Nur Laela Wahyuni Meilawati; NFN Melati; Devi Rusmin
Buletin Penelitian Tanaman Rempah dan Obat Vol 29, No 2 (2018): Buletin Penelitian Tanaman Rempah dan Obat
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Perkebunan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21082/bullittro.v29n2.2018.101-109

Abstract

Turmeric development to fulfil market demand as raw material for herbal industry requires qualified planting material in adequate quantities. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of varieties and seeds type of turmeric to the seeds efficiency, seeds viability, plant performance and rhizome yield. This experiment was conducted at the greenhouse of Indonesian Spices and Medicinal Crops Research Institute (ISMCRI), Bogor and Cicurug Research Installation, Sukabumi from November 2016 to July 2017. The study was arranged in split plot with 3 replications. The main plot was three varieties of turmeric: Curdonia, Turina 2 and Turina 3. The subplot was eight types of seeds-rhizome: (a) single finger rhizome, (b) finger rhizome with one branch, (c) finger rhizome with >1 branches, (d) mother rhizome split 2 horizontally, (e) mother rhizome split 2 vertically, (f) mother rhizome split 4 horizontally, (g) mother rhizome split 4 vertically and (h) whole mother rhizome. Parameters measured were seeds viability, growth and rhizomes yield. Seeds efficiency of Curdonia and Turina 2 can be achieved by using finger rhizome of about 0.49 t.ha-1 for both varieties,  rhizome yields of 6.63 t.ha-1 and 11.45 t.ha-1 respectively. Another alternative were the use of 0.47 t.ha-1 mother rhizome split 4 vertically, yielding 9.65 t.ha-1 and 14.20 t.ha-1 fresh rhizome for Curdonia and Turina 2 varieties, consecutively. However, for Turina 3 variety, the seeds efficiency was shown by using mother rhizome split 4 horizontally of 0.66 t.ha1 and yielding fresh rhizome  of 17.44 t.ha-1. 

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5

 1 

Filter by Year

2018 2018


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 32, No 2 (2021): Buletin Penelitian Tanaman Rempah dan Obat Vol 32, No 1 (2021): Buletin Penelitian Tanaman Rempah dan Obat Vol 31, No 2 (2020): Buletin Penelitian Tanaman Rempah dan Obat Vol 31, No 1 (2020): Buletin Penelitian Tanaman Rempah dan Obat Vol 30, No 2 (2019): Buletin Penelitian Tanaman Rempah dan Obat Vol 30, No 1 (2019): Buletin Penelitian Tanaman Rempah dan Obat Vol 29, No 2 (2018): Buletin Penelitian Tanaman Rempah dan Obat Vol 29, No 1 (2018): Buletin Penelitian Tanaman Rempah dan Obat Vol 28, No 2 (2017): BULETIN PENELITIAN TANAMAN REMPAH DAN OBAT Vol 28, No 1 (2017): BULETIN PENELITIAN TANAMAN REMPAH DAN OBAT Vol 27, No 2 (2016): BULETIN PENELITIAN TANAMAN REMPAH DAN OBAT Vol 27, No 1 (2016): BULETIN PENELITIAN TANAMAN REMPAH DAN OBAT Vol 26, No 2 (2015): Buletin Penelitian Tanaman Rempah dan Obat Vol 26, No 1 (2015): Buletin Penelitian Tanaman Rempah dan Obat Vol 25, No 2 (2014): Buletin Penelitian Tanaman Rempah dan Obat Vol 25, No 1 (2014): Buletin Penelitian Tanaman Rempah dan Obat Vol 24, No 2 (2013): Buletin Penelitian Tanaman Rempah dan Obat Vol 24, No 1 (2013): Buletin Penelitian Tanaman Rempah dan Obat Vol 23, No 2 (2012): BULETIN PENELITIAN TANAMAN REMPAH DAN OBAT Vol 23, No 1 (2012): BULETIN PENELITIAN TANAMAN REMPAH DAN OBAT Vol 22, No 2 (2011): BULETIN PENELITIAN TANAMAN REMPAH DAN OBAT Vol 22, No 1 (2011): BULETIN PENELITIAN TANAMAN REMPAH DAN OBAT Vol 21, No 2 (2010): BULETIN PENELITIAN TANAMAN REMPAH DAN OBAT Vol 21, No 1 (2010): BULETIN PENELITIAN TANAMAN REMPAH DAN OBAT Vol 20, No 2 (2009): BULETIN PENELITIAN TANAMAN REMPAH DAN OBAT Vol 20, No 1 (2009): BULETIN PENELITIAN TANAMAN REMPAH DAN OBAT Vol 19, No 2 (2008): BULETIN PENELITIAN TANAMAN REMPAH DAN OBAT Vol 19, No 1 (2008): BULETIN PENELITIAN TANAMAN REMPAH DAN OBAT Vol 18, No 2 (2007): BULETIN PENELITIAN TANAMAN REMPAH DAN OBAT Vol 18, No 1 (2007): BULETIN PENELITIAN TANAMAN REMPAH DAN OBAT Vol 17, No 2 (2006): BULETIN PENELITIAN TANAMAN REMPAH DAN OBAT Vol 17, No 1 (2006): BULETIN PENELITIAN TANAMAN REMPAH DAN OBAT Vol 16, No 2 (2005): BULETIN PENELITIAN TANAMAN REMPAH DAN OBAT Vol 16, No 1 (2005): BULETIN PENELITIAN TANAMAN REMPAH DAN OBAT Vol 15, No 2 (2004): BULETIN PENELITIAN TANAMAN REMPAH DAN OBAT Vol 15, No 1 (2004): BULETIN PENELITIAN TANAMAN REMPAH DAN OBAT Vol 14, No 2 (2003): BULETIN PENELITIAN TANAMAN REMPAH DAN OBAT Vol 14, No 1 (2003): BULETIN PENELITIAN TANAMAN REMPAH DAN OBAT Vol 13, No 2 (2002): Buletin Penelitian Tanaman Rempah dan Obat Vol 13, No 1 (2002): Buletin Penelitian Tanaman Rempah dan Obat Vol 12, No 1 (2001): Buletin Penelitian Tanaman Rempah dan Obat Vol 11, No 2 (2000): Buletin Penelitian Tanaman Rempah dan Obat Vol 10, No 1 (1999): Buletin Penelitian Tanaman Rempah dan Obat Vol 9, No 2 (1994): Buletin Penelitian Tanaman Rempah dan Obat Vol 9, No 1 (1994): Buletin Penelitian Tanaman Rempah dan Obat Vol 8, No 2 (1993): Buletin Penelitian Tanaman Rempah dan Obat Vol 8, No 1 (1993): Buletin Penelitian Tanaman Rempah dan Obat Vol 7, No 2 (1992): Buletin Penelitian Tanaman Rempah dan Obat Vol 7, No 1 (1992): Buletin Penelitian Tanaman Rempah dan Obat Vol 6, No 2 (1991): Buletin Penelitian Tanaman Rempah dan Obat Vol 6, No 1 (1991): Buletin Penelitian Tanaman Rempah dan Obat Vol 5, No 2 (1990): Buletin Penelitian Tanaman Rempah dan Obat Vol 5, No 1 (1990): Buletin Penelitian Tanaman Rempah dan Obat Vol 4, No 2 (1989): Buletin Penelitian Tanaman Rempah dan Obat Vol 4, No 1 (1989): Buletin Penelitian Tanaman Rempah dan Obat Vol 3, No 2 (1988): Buletin Penelitian Tanaman Rempah dan Obat Vol 3, No 1 (1988): Buletin Penelitian Tanaman Rempah dan Obat Vol 2, No 2 (1987): Buletin Penelitian Tanaman Rempah dan Obat Vol 2, No 1 (1987): Buletin Penelitian Tanaman Rempah dan Obat Vol 1, No 2 (1986): BULETIN PENELITIAN TANAMAN REMPAH DAN OBAT Vol 1, No 1 (1986): Buletin Penelitian Tanaman Rempah dan Obat More Issue