Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Article Per Year (5 Year)

All

Getsempena English Education Journal

geej
Website

Published by STKIP Bina Bangsa Getsempena Banda Aceh

ISSN : 2355004X EISSN : 25026801 DOI : https://doi.org/10.46244/geej.v7i1

Core Subject : Education,

Education

Getsempena English Education Journal (e-ISSN: 2502-6801 and p-ISSN 2355-004X) is a periodical scientific publication dedicated to lecturers, students and educational observers to disseminate relevant research, thought and research results in the field of English. Any visitor to this site can browse abstracts, read journal contents and download PDF files. Getsempena English Education Journal (GEEJ) is published twice a year, May and November.

Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Pendidikan

Articles 8 Documents

Search results for , issue "Vol. 3 No. 1 (2016)" : 8 Documents clear

A REPORT OF TEXTBOOK ANALYSIS : (Scaffolding English for Junior High School Students) Hijjatul Qamariah
Getsempena English Education Journal Vol. 3 No. 1 (2016)
Publisher : English Education Department

In this paper, the textbook of junior high school entitled Scaffolding: English for Junior High School Students is analyzed. To this end, types of syllabus containing in the book are firstly explored. Then, it is argued what types of syllabus is dominantly governed the textbook by examining the content, activities and tasks in the textbook. It is revealed that the textbook predominantly instructed by structural syllabus with an approach of genre-based syllabus. However, the book is lacked of communicative approach even though the activities designed are aimed at increasing communicative competence of the students. Finally, the suggestion is made for the perfection of the textbook. It is recommended that to be more communicative in teaching and learning language, teacher can manipulate some activities in the textbook to be more expressive and real. In addition, the translation in every instruction of the task is not a good point of this textbook. It is supposed to be the learners acquire it as they are emergent in the process of learning. It will be meaningful for the learners when they understand by themselves without any translation provided.

AN OVERVIEW OF NUMBER HEADS TOGETHER IN LANGUAGE TEACHING Rusmiati
Getsempena English Education Journal Vol. 3 No. 1 (2016)
Publisher : English Education Department

Numbered Heads Together is a cooperative learning strategy that holds each student accountable for learning the material. Cooperative learning strategy promotes discussion and both individual and group accountability. It offers an alternative to the competitive approach of whole-class question-answer, in which the teacher asks a question and then calls on one of the students with a raised hand. In the numbered heads together approach, the teacher has students number off (e.g. 1-4), asks a question, and then tells the students to “put their heads together” to develop a complete answer to the question. When the teacher calls out a number, the students with that number raise their hands to respond. This structure facilitates positive interdependence, while promoting individual accountability. It also gives confidence to lower achievers because they know they will have the correct answer to give to the class. This study tries to indicate some theories based on experts definition about understanding of cooperative learning, the purpose of cooperative learning, understanding of number heads together (NHT), and characteristic of NHT technique.

STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION TOWARD WRITTEN CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN WRITING CLASSROOM Rosdiana
Getsempena English Education Journal Vol. 3 No. 1 (2016)
Publisher : English Education Department

The way to respond to students’ drafting is still a controversial topic in Second Language Writing training and premise. Giving written corrective feedback in the process of teaching writing is a common practice by writing teachers because it is believed to be able to help students write better. The feedback may be given directly or indirectly. The feedback may be given in the form of comments, questions, suggestions, and or corrections. It seems to be no dispute about the first three kinds of feedback. But for the corrections as the feedback in the process of teaching writing, there are two opposing views; one view believes that correction is counter-productive while the other view believes that correction is helpful. This Study aimed to explore English Department Students’ perception, beliefs, and attitude toward Written Corrective Feedback in writing classroom. Data were obtained from questionnaire and from follow up interview. The findings of an investigation on English Department Student of UIN Ar-Raniry showed that students’ preferences for feedback and error correction on their writing. Most students wished their teacher to mark and correct errors for them and believe that Written Corrective Feedback was primarily the teacher’s responsibility. Written Corrective Feedback definitely help the students in writing academic pieces better and more easily as they go through the writing process.

THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ROLE PLAY TECHNIQUE IN TEACHING SPEAKING : (An Experimental Study To The First Year Students Of SMP N 8 Nagan Raya) Maulizan ZA; Nurfajri Safalinda
Getsempena English Education Journal Vol. 3 No. 1 (2016)
Publisher : English Education Department

This study study aimed to examine whether there is a significant difference in the speaking mastery of students between those who are taught using role play and traditional technique. The subjects of the study were all students of First grade students of SMPN 8 Nagan Raya. The population in this research is the first grade students which consist of 42 students from two classes. In this research, the researcher does not take any sample. The subject of this researcher is the population; 42 students. The population was divided into two groups; 21 students were experimental group and 21 students were control group. The data collected through pre-test and post-test. The pre-test was given to control and experimental group. The scores were obtained to know whether the means of the two groups were not significantly different. From the result of data analysis on the students’ score in pre-test found that the mean score of experimental group was 50.71, the mean score of control group was 49.61, the t-value was 0.64, and the t-critical was 1.684. From the result above, it is found that there is no significant difference between two mean because t-value is smaller than t-critical. Therefore, it can be concluded that experimental and control groups had same English ability at the time of the test. The result of data analysis on the students’ score of post-test, it was found that the mean score of experimental group was 70.14, the mean score of control group was 54.67, t-value was 18.31 and t-critical was 2.021. From the result above, it is found that there is a significant difference between two means because t-value is greater than t-critical. Therefore, it can be concluded that the students who were taught by using role play gave better result compared the using speaking through traditional technique.

A STUDY ON COMPARISON BETWEEN THE DIALECTS OF WEST SIMEULUE AND MIDDLE SIMEULUE Sariakin
Getsempena English Education Journal Vol. 3 No. 1 (2016)
Publisher : English Education Department

This study is about a comparative study between the dialect of West Simeule and Middle Simeulu. The aim of this study is to find out the differences between the dialects of west Simeulue and middle Simeulue.The subject of this study is all of the utterances of West Simeulue and Middle Simeulue dialects. While the sample of the study is taken from twenty adult informants who are native speakers form the two dialects. The data needed are collected through interview. Meanwhile the data gotten are analyzed by describing the difference between dialects which are used by people of West Simeulu and Middle Simuelu. The result of the study shows that there are three different dialects that are used in West Simeulu and Middle Simeulu; differences in morphology, differences in preposition, differences in vocabulary.

THE USE OF REPORT SCRIPT IN IMPROVING STUDENTS’ WRITING ABILITY : (A Descriptive Study at The Second Year Students of STKIP Bina Bangsa Getsempena Banda Aceh) Regina Rahmi; Muhammad Abrar
Getsempena English Education Journal Vol. 3 No. 1 (2016)
Publisher : English Education Department

This study which was conducted at the second year of English students of STKIP Bina Bangsa Getsempena Banda Aceh in academic year 2013/2014 which consists of 6 female students and 1 male student, intended to figure out “The use of report script in improving students’ writing ability”. The writers use students’ writing sheet as instrument. Based on the analyzed data the writers infer conclusion that the use of report script toward students’ writing ability conveys the student to decide themain idea in the general classification, the facts about topic as a supporting sentence in the description, and the result of the topic in the conclusion. The students are able to write related to the characteristics of writing such as coherence, cohesion, and unity. Although, the student’s writing still have the errors, malformation and disordering in paragraph.

AN ANALYSIS OF TEACHING LEARNING PROCESS Salwa Chaira
Getsempena English Education Journal Vol. 3 No. 1 (2016)
Publisher : English Education Department

This article is about an analysis of teaching and learning process in an English classroom. it also gives an explanation of the presence of Input-Interaction-Output (IIO). In the article, there are details of the type of input and role applied by the teacher, the type and role of interaction built, and the type of output and its lead. Besides, other elements such as English talk and lesson explanation, the feedback given by the teacher, language view, materials, and activity in the classroom, etc will include in the essay. The method applied in the article is document analysis. The result is that the way the teacher teaches, the method she applies, and the approach she implements can offer and encourage them to obtain the knowledge in a good way. These factors seem agreeable as the students can perceive her teaching style well. However, the material or the subject provided by the teacher seems much lower for the students’ capacity. Thus, the writer suggests that Monique offer a little bit higher input.

CHILDREN'S LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT Sri Wahyuni
Getsempena English Education Journal Vol. 3 No. 1 (2016)
Publisher : English Education Department

The objective of this article is to describe how children's language is developed. The development of child's language actually begun when a child was born with language or a simple talk. First language is the language that is the primary language that is acquired which is called native language or mother tongue. This study is intended to children's language development and their social interaction. To get the data, four children asked to speak about everything of their interest. The process of recording was made as naturally as possible. All the data obtained were then used to facilitate the researcher in describing children's talk. As the result, children direct his attention to thing that language is easy to understand and they used primary interest to help them learn the language related to their interest. They also enjoyed the repetitive events of their life and used it strategies to help them in learning a language. Children can quickly acquire new words if they always heard a new language around them and automatically the development of their language will increased faster. Children learn language through their natural desire to call an object by its name and almost all of the words their produced were not clear enough. They often used a piece of dismembered words.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 8

Filter by Year

2016 2016

Filter By Issues

All Issue Vol. 10 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 9 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 9 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2021) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2020) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2020) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2019) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2019) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2018) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2018) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2017) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2017) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2016) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2016) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2015) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2015) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2014) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2014) More Issue

Home Page

OAI Link

Editorial Team

Contact

Reviewer

Google Scholar

Contact Name
Yusrawati JR Simatupang

Contact Email
yusrawati090992@gmail.com

Phone
+6285260106663

Journal Mail Official
intankemalasari00@gmail.com

Editorial Address
Jalan Tanggul Krueng Aceh, Nomor 34, STKIP Bina Bangsa Getsempena, Rukoh Darussalam, Banda Aceh

Location
Kota banda aceh,

Aceh

INDONESIA

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Home Page

OAI Link

Editorial Team

Contact

Reviewer

Google Scholar

Contact Name Yusrawati JR Simatupang

Contact Email yusrawati090992@gmail.com

Phone +6285260106663

Journal Mail Official intankemalasari00@gmail.com

Editorial Address Jalan Tanggul Krueng Aceh, Nomor 34, STKIP Bina Bangsa Getsempena, Rukoh Darussalam, Banda Aceh

Location Kota banda aceh, Aceh INDONESIA

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Contact Name
Yusrawati JR Simatupang

Contact Email
yusrawati090992@gmail.com

Phone
+6285260106663

Journal Mail Official
intankemalasari00@gmail.com

Editorial Address
Jalan Tanggul Krueng Aceh, Nomor 34, STKIP Bina Bangsa Getsempena, Rukoh Darussalam, Banda Aceh

Location
Kota banda aceh,

Aceh

INDONESIA