cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Ahyar Ansori
Contact Email
ahyaransori@gmail.com
Phone
+6285333666256
Journal Mail Official
juridica@ugr.ac.id
Editorial Address
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gunung Rinjani, Jalan Raya Mataram – Labuan Lombok Km. 50, Gedung Putih Lantai I » Tel / fax : 0376-631621 / 0376-631621
Location
Kab. lombok timur,
Nusa tenggara barat
INDONESIA
JURIDICA : Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gunung Rinjani
Published by Universitas Gunung Rinjani
ISSN : 2722242X     EISSN : 27212653     DOI : https://doi.org/10.46601/juridica
Core Subject : Religion, Humanities, Social,
Religion Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
The purpose of JURIDICA is to provide space or place for academics, researchers, practitioners and students to publish articles from the original research results or articles from the study and legal analysis. The scope of articles published in this journal addresses a variety of topics, including: 1. Criminal Law; 2. Civil Law; 3. Constitutional Law; 4. Political Law; 5. Administrative Law; 6. International Law; 7. Customary Law 8. Islamic law; 9. Law and Society; 10. Economic and Business Law; 11. Environmental Law; 12. Health Law; 13. Labor Law; 14. Law of Information Technology and Electronic Transactions; 15. Human Rights Law; 16. Consumer Protection;
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 6 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 2 No. 1 (2020): Pembaharuan Hukum dan Pengadilan" : 6 Documents clear
BATASAN KEWENANGAN MENGADILI PENGADILAN UMUM DAN PENGADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM YANG MELIBATKAN BADAN NEGARA ATAU PEJABAT PEMERINTAH DITINJAU DARI PERMA NOMOR 2 TAHUN 2019 HAIRUL MAKSUM
JURIDICA : Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gunung Rinjani Vol. 2 No. 1 (2020): Pembaharuan Hukum dan Pengadilan
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gunung Rinjani

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46601/juridica.v2i1.178

Abstract

Permasalahan yang diangkat dalam penelitian ini yaitu pertama, Bagaimana batasan kewenangan mengadili Pengadilan Umum dan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara (TUN) dalam sengketa Perbuatan Melawan Hukum berdasarkan kompetensinya menurut peraturan perundang-undangan dan Kedua, Bagaimana pengaturan kewenangan mengadili Pengadilan Negeri dan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara (TUN) dalam perkara perbuatan melawan hukum apabila melibatkan Badan Negara atau Pejebat Pemerintah. Menurut PERMA No. 2 Tahun 2019. Penelitian ini pada prinsifnya bertujuan untuk mengetahui batasan kewenangan mengadili antara Peradilan Umum dan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, karena dalam pelaksanaan hukum acara dipengadilan sering sekali terjadi titik singgung terhadap kewenangan mengadili antara kedua Lapangan Pengadilan tersebut. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa, pertama tentang kompetensi absolut antara Peradilan Umum dan peradilan Tata Usaha Negara (TUN) yang sebenarnya telah diatur dalam undang-undang, baik itu di dalam Undang Undang Kekuasaan Kehakiman, dan Undang-Undang tentang Mahakamah Agung, akan tetapi pengaturan tersebut masih bias karena tidak menyebutkan secara spesifik batasan-batasan kewenangan tersebut, sehingga menimbulkan titik singgung dalam penerapan. Untuk menghindari titik singgung tentang kewenangan mengadili antara kedua pengadilan, yaitu Pengadilan Negeri dan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara maka Mahkamah Agung sebagai pemegang kekuasaan kehakiman yang tertinggi mengaturnya dengan mengeluarkan PERMA yang bersifat Lex specialist untuk mengatur tentang itu, sehingga dikeluarkan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung (PERMA) Nomor 2 Tahun 2019 tentang Pedoman Penyelesaian sengketa Tindakan Pemerintah dan Kewenangan Mengadili Perbuatan Melanggar Hukum oleh Badan dan/atau Pejabat Pemerintahan (Onrechmatige Overheidsdaad).
PENERAPAN GUGATAN SEDERHANA (SMALL CLAIM COURT) DALAM PENYELESAIAN PERKARA WANPRESTASI DI PENGADILAN NEGERI SELONG ERNA Purnawati
JURIDICA : Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gunung Rinjani Vol. 2 No. 1 (2020): Pembaharuan Hukum dan Pengadilan
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gunung Rinjani

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46601/juridica.v2i1.179

Abstract

This study aims to determine how the application of a simpleclaim court in the settlement of default cases at Selong DistrictCourt, and to find out what aret the obstacles to a small claimcourt in settling default cases at Selong District Court. Thebenefits of this research are expected to provide input in thedevelopment of legal science,especially in the field of civil lawrelated of the settlement of simple lawsuits, especially theclassification of cases breach of contract. The method used inthis research is empirically legal research. The result showedthat the implementation of Perma Number 2 of 2015 andPerma umber 4 of 2019 concerning Procedures for solvingsimple lawsuits at Selong District Court was carried outeffectively with constraints that were more due to theweakness of the Perma itself internally
IMPLEMENTASI DAN DAMPAK E-COURT (ELECTRONICS JUSTICE SYSTEM) TERHADAP ADVOKAT DALAM PROSES PENYELESAIAN PERKARA DI PENGADILAN NEGERI SELONG Paridah Bq.
JURIDICA : Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gunung Rinjani Vol. 2 No. 1 (2020): Pembaharuan Hukum dan Pengadilan
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gunung Rinjani

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46601/juridica.v2i1.180

Abstract

This thesis aims to determine how the impact on theapplication of the e-court application on advocates in theprocess of solving cases in the Selong district court, as well asto fine out what are the obstacles to the application of the ecourt application. The benefits of this research are expected toprovide knowledge about e-court and the steps in –ecourtoperation with the principle of simple, fast and low cost.Theresearch method used is empirical normative legal researchmethods. The results of this study indicate that the stipulationof perma no.3 of 2018 jo perma no 1 of 2019 concerning theadministration of cases and trials in court electronically showsquite good results and can be applied by all lawyers.
EKSISTENSI BADAN PEMBINAAN IDEOLOGI PANCASILA (BPIP) DALAM SISTEM KETATANEGARAAN REPUBLIK INDONESIA Burhanuddin
JURIDICA : Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gunung Rinjani Vol. 2 No. 1 (2020): Pembaharuan Hukum dan Pengadilan
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gunung Rinjani

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46601/juridica.v2i1.181

Abstract

Research to determine the position of the Pancasila IdeologyDevelopment Agency in the state administration system of theRepublic of Indonesia. This agency was formed as a concrete effortby the government to carry out its function as state administrator inresponding to the developing political situation in society, related tothe emergence of several political currents and identity politics whichare closely related to the role of Pancasila as the state ideology.Previously the President had issued Presidential Decree Number 54 of2017 concerning UKP-PIP which was considered to make it difficultfor the agency to coordinate with ministries and state agencies,because the UKP-PIP's authority was still at the level of the Ministry'sDirector General. This research uses normative legal research withstatutory and conceptual approaches. The analysis technique used isqualitative analysis by collecting legal material and then editing it firstto be used as material for analysis that is qualitative in nature.
PENERAPAN ASAS NEBIS IN IDEM DALAM PERKARA PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM OLEH MAHKAMAH AGUNG ATAS UPAYA HUKUM LUAR BIASA “PENINJAUAN KEMBALI”: Kajian Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 405 PK/PDT/2017 Hariadi
JURIDICA : Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gunung Rinjani Vol. 2 No. 1 (2020): Pembaharuan Hukum dan Pengadilan
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gunung Rinjani

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46601/juridica.v2i1.182

Abstract

This study aims to find out how the Supreme Court decidescases of unlawful acts with the principle of nebis in idem andthe basis for consideration of the Supreme Court justicesexamining and deciding Case Number 405 PK / Pdt / 2017,related to the principle of nebis in idem. This research is a typeof normative law, with a normative juridical approach, namelydoctrinal law research which refers to legal norms. emphasizessecondary sources of material, both regulations and legaltheories, and examines legal principles that are scientifictheoretical in nature and can be used to analyze the problemsdiscussed. The method of analysis of normative legal researchis in the form of a prescriptive method, namely a method ofanalysis that provides an assessment (justification) of theobject under study whether it is true or false, or what shouldbe according to law.
DEKONSTRUKSI PENGAWASAN PERATURAN DAERAH SETELAH BERLAKUNYA UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 11 TAHUN 2020 TENTANG CIPTA KERJA Basri Mulyani
JURIDICA : Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gunung Rinjani Vol. 2 No. 1 (2020): Pembaharuan Hukum dan Pengadilan
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gunung Rinjani

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46601/juridica.v2i1.183

Abstract

Constitutional Court Decision of Number 137/PUU-XIII/2015and Decision Number 56/PUU-XIV/2016 which state that theauthority of the Minister of Home Affairs and the Governor asthe representative of the central government in cancelingProvincial Regulations, District Regulation/City Regulation,Governor Regulation, and Regent Regulation/Regulation ofMayor was inconstitutional. So only the Supreme Court has theauthority to revoke Provincial Regulations, DistrictRegulation/City Regulations, Governor Regulation, and RegentRegulation/Regulation of Mayor. This analysis makes use of thelegal juridical normative research method. The results showthat in a state of unity it is appropriate that higher levels ofgovernment are given the authority to supervise theregulations set in the regions. The supervision can beimplemented by conducting such a guidance to the regionthrough the strengthening of executive preview or legal normreview before it is legally binding in general

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 6

 1 

Filter by Year

2020 2020


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 4 No. 2 (2023): HUKUM ADMINISTRASI PELAYANAN PUBLIK Vol. 4 No. 1 (2022): Kepastian dan Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Masyarakat Vol. 3 No. 2 (2022): Lembaga Damai Dalam Proses Penyelesaian Sengketa Vol. 3 No. 1 (2021): Kolaborasi Hukum dan Era Digitaliasasi Vol. 2 No. 2 (2021): Konstruksi Hubungan Pemerintah Daerah Vol. 2 No. 1 (2020): Pembaharuan Hukum dan Pengadilan Vol. 1 No. 1 (2019): Kompleksitas Hukum Administrasi