cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Fradhana Putra Disantara
Contact Email
dfradhana@gmail.com
Phone
+6282143093798
Journal Mail Official
jkph@unej.ac.id
Editorial Address
Faculty of Law, University of Jember Jalan Kalimantan No. 37 Jember, East Java, Indonesia 68121
Location
Kab. jember,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Jurnal Kajian Pembaruan Hukum
Published by Universitas Jember
ISSN : -     EISSN : 27769828     DOI : https://10.19184/jkph
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jurnal Kajian Pembaruan Hukum (ISSN 2776-9828) is a refereed law journal published by the postgraduate program (Master of Laws) of the University of Jember, Indonesia. The publication in this journal focuses on the studies in law reform under doctrinal, empirical, socio-legal, and comparative approaches. The journal welcomes all submissions about constitutional law, criminal law, private law which emphasize the new perspectives for displaying and opening an intimate knowledge into the way they work in practice. Manuscript submissions should be between 7,000-10,000 words in length, although shorter papers relating to policy analysis and debate will be considered. The peer-review process and decision on publication will normally be completed within 60 days of receipt of submissions The aims of the journal are to encourage scholarly attention and advance the intimate knowledge of recent legal discourses. It accommodates high-quality manuscripts relevant to the endeavors of scholars and legal professionals with fundamental and long-term analysis in the light of empirical, theoretical, multidisciplinary, and comparative approaches. The focus of the journal is legal studies. Articles submitted to this journal are on contemporary legal discourses in the light of theoretical, doctrinal, multidisciplinary, empirical, and comparative studies. The scope of the paper submissions includes constitutional and administrative law, corporate law, criminal justice, adat law, law and society, international law, international economic law, human rights law, and intellectual property law.
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 5 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 2 No 2 (2022): July-December 2022" : 5 Documents clear
The Regulatory Reform of Advocate Organizations in Proposing Oath of Prospective Advocates in Indonesia Nur Solikin; Anis Rohmatullah
Jurnal Kajian Pembaruan Hukum Vol 2 No 2 (2022): July-December 2022
Publisher : University of Jember, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/jkph.v2i2.23400

Abstract

Following the enactment of Advocate Law 18/2003, Indonesian Bar Association must commence a proposal for the advocate's oath before the High Court. As per the rules, the oath should be submitted by a single bar, whereas there has been more than one advocate association in Indonesia. Each association has claimed to be a legitimate "Indonesian Bar Association" in administrating lawyers. In short, while the law demands a single bar system, the reality asserts a multi-bar. This study aimed to portray the entanglement of the dynamics of legal politics during the drafting process of the Advocate Law and, at the same time to analyze the development of the Indonesian Bar Association. This study used the normative juridical legal approach to examine law and other relevant materials. This study showed that the bar organization in Indonesia has long historical roots that can be traced back to the Dutch East Indies era in which Indonesia, in the post-independence period, adopted the Dutch's single bar system. However, a unified single bar system has been hard to achieve and still out of sight. With the growing number of bars in Indonesia, the Supreme Court then recently enacted the Supreme Court Letter 2015, which permitted the whole bars to submit the oath. In conclusion, the Supreme Court Letter 2015 does not only recognize the advocate associations but also marks a legal paradigm shift from single to multi-bar. To end such legal uncertainty, this study suggested that Advocate Law should be amended to accommodate a multi-bar system.
Fake News in the Time of COVID-19 in Indonesia: Criminal Law Issues Windisen Windisen
Jurnal Kajian Pembaruan Hukum Vol 2 No 2 (2022): July-December 2022
Publisher : University of Jember, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/jkph.v2i2.31184

Abstract

The rise of the world wide web has its janus face. While it is no longer possible to live without it, the internet also causes social issues. One will be examined here is how law can cope with the acceleration amount of fake news. The spread of fake news via the Internet in Indonesia during the COVID-19 pandemic has increasingly resulted in criminalization. One enforcement policy is based on Article 28(1) of Electronic Information and Technology Law 11/2008. The article focused on measuring fake news in light of economic loss, which to some degree, also affected fair business competition. This study was conducted based on two primary considerations. First, the nature of criminal law should be used as the last resort (ultimum remedium) in tackling social issues. Second, and still related to the previous, the damage control of the spread of fake news. In that regard, a doctrinal legal approach was deployed to analyze the formulation and implementation of Article 28(1) of the 11/2008 Law in tackling the fake news phenomenon. This study found that there are ambiguities in interpretation, which affect the law's implementation. To cope with such a problem, the government consists of the Ministry of Communication and Information Technology, Chief of Public Prosecutor, and Chief of State Police enact Joint Decree to provide the guidelines on the application of Article 28(1); the policy should be considered as temporary instead of a permanent solution. This study suggested that in the long run, there is a need to amend Article 28(1).
Bajo Tribal Marine Customary Rights Supervision: A Reform with Archipelagic Characteristics Dicky Eko Prasetio; Irfa Ronaboyd
Jurnal Kajian Pembaruan Hukum Vol 2 No 2 (2022): July-December 2022
Publisher : University of Jember, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/jkph.v2i2.25255

Abstract

There are provinces in Indonesia considered “archipelagic” and “non-archipelagic.” One criterion is to determine whether a province has an ocean wider than the land, with the so-called matter of geography. The issue raised here is a condition where an archipelagic custom exists in a non-archipelagic province. Such a gap between geographical concern and customary characteristics brings at least two consequences. First, a non-archipelagic province has been set out in the international customary law of the sea, including the 1982 UNCLOS on Traditional Fisheries Rights and the law on the Management of Coastal Islands and Small Islands. Second is the problem of recognizing a unique coastal-oceanic socio-culture in that province. This study was motivated to bridge the two, i.e., the legal and socio-cultural case of the Bajo Tribe in Gorontalo Province. Bajo is a tribe with an archipelagic socio-cultural tradition, while Gorontalo is categorized as a non-archipelagic province. So far, there is no clear legal framework on how the national and international laws captured the existing tradition, custom, and wisdom, as shown in Bajo’s. In this regard, a normative legal method was used by collecting and analyzing how national and international instruments answered the call from the Bajo Community. This study found that, at the core, the main issue was the gap of recognition between geography and socio-cultural perspectives in policy-making. This study also found that the Bajo has experienced a limbo due to the no clear policy on how the existence of their community is accommodated. Finally, this research suggested that an archipelagic tradition such as Bajo’s should be recognized in the non-archipelagic province’s policy to construct a bridge connecting geography and socio-cultural tradition.
The Pathway of Adopting Omnibus Law in Indonesia's Legislation: Challenges and Opportunities in Legal Reform Sulistina Sulistina; Bayu Dwi Anggono; Al Khanif; Tran Ngoc Dinh
Jurnal Kajian Pembaruan Hukum Vol 2 No 2 (2022): July-December 2022
Publisher : University of Jember, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/jkph.v2i2.31524

Abstract

The omnibus law model has become a new method of legislative drafting in Indonesia, first applied to the Job Creation Law and later enacted as Law 11/2020. While there were no implicit guidelines in Legislative Drafting Law 12/2011, this adoption was imported from several countries like the United States and Ireland to simplify regulations before the method was subsequently formalized and included in Legislative Drafting Law 13/2022. This paper explored the pathway and dynamics of the omnibus law adoption in Indonesia's law-making procedure and analyzed its further impacts on whether such a method has fruitfully improved the quality of the enacted regulation in establishing a more friendly investment policy. Through doctrinal method, this study showed that the opportunity to apply the omnibus model in Indonesia depends on the effectiveness, success, and benefits of respective regulations. In contrast, the application of the omnibus law model should respect democratic principles and avoid public harm. As shown in three different countries, i.e., Indonesia, the United States, and Canada, public concerns on lack of participation should be taken seriously to hinder undemocratic ends through "democratic" means. Alternatively, accountability of the drafting process should be considered a priority. In summary, the increasing trend of adopting the omnibus model should be first adopted and promulgated through legislative products whose promulgation must be with a formidable law-making procedure.
The Trajectory of Democracy in Sri Lanka from the Restriction of the Freedom of Expression during the COVID-19 Pandemic Anggi Prasetyo; Evoryo Carel Prabhata
Jurnal Kajian Pembaruan Hukum Vol 2 No 2 (2022): July-December 2022
Publisher : University of Jember, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/jkph.v2i2.31193

Abstract

COVID-19 pandemic has heavily influenced the legal conduct of a state, especially Sri Lanka. This country is one of the so-called democratic states shown to abuse law conduct under the backdrop of emergency measures, so many people have been detained due to newly enacted policies. Since the beginning of this pandemic, various criticism of pandemic management has addressed the state-triggered government overreaches such as arrestable offenses and internet censorship in the name of public order. This research aims to analyze whether the government's responses to opinions, critics, or any media format that embodies a form of speech are justified as an emergency measure against COVID-19. Then, this paper analyzes further its implication for freedom of speech. In addition, this research aims to challenge the government's measurement of the limitation of freedom of expression in social media. This research analyzes the government's response to securing fundamental rights during emergency regulations. In addition, the Sri Lankan legal framework of previous judicial precedent and state conduct towards the issue will be further analyzed. In addition, various rules from the authoritarian and democratic states compared further understand the framework on freedom of expression. This study showed a declining democratic value in Sri Lanka. Different legal conducts indicated that the Sri Lankan government does not comply with the rule of law and the fundamental rights of its citizen. This study emphasizes the need for immediate legal reform, especially in various mishandled cases. State oppression of freedom of expression harms the public order and threatens state stability.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5

 1 

Filter by Year

2022 2022


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 3 No 1 (2023): January-June 2023 Vol 3 No 2 (2023): In Progress Vol 2 No 2 (2022): July-December 2022 Vol 2 No 1 (2022): January-June 2022 Vol 1 No 2 (2021): July-December 2021 Vol 1 No 1 (2021): January-June 2021