cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
andika adhyaksa
Contact Email
klj@unkhair.ac.id
Phone
+6281343974566
Journal Mail Official
klj@unkhair.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Jusuf Abdulrahman, Gambesi Kota Ternate, Maluku Utara, Indonesia
Location
Kota ternate,
Maluku utara
INDONESIA
KHAIRUN LAW JOURNAL
Published by Universitas Khairun
ISSN : 25809016     EISSN : 25811797     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Khairun Law Journal (KLJ) is an official journal of Faculty of Law, Khairun University. KLJ published semi-annualy in September and March. The aims of this journal is to provide a venue for academicians, researchers and practitioners for publishing the original research articles or review articles. The scope of the articles published in KLJ is deal with a broad range of topics, including:Criminal Law; Civil Law; International Law; Constitutional Law; Administrative Law; Islamic Law; Economic Law; Medical Law; Agrarian Law; Adat Law; and Environmental Law.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 5 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Volume 7 Issue 2, March 2024" : 5 Documents clear
PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA E-COMMERCE MELALUI ONLINE DISPUTE RESOLUTION Muhammad Iqbal Suma
Khairun Law Journal Volume 7 Issue 2, March 2024
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Khairun University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33387/klj.v7i2.7434

Abstract

Technological breakthroughs have driven significant growth in the economic sector, especially in increasing electronic transactions through digital platforms. The growth of e-commerce transactions has also led to trade disputes that are detrimental to consumers. This study aims to see how aspects of consumer protection are in e-commerce transactions. This research will also analyze how the process of resolving e-commerce transaction disputes through settlement via Online Dispute Resolution (ODR). The results of the research show that the government has made efforts to protect consumers by issuing Law number 8 of 1999 concerning consumer protection. Even so, the law has not been able to guarantee consumer protection in digital transactions in e-commerce. This is because the model of transactions carried out via digital platforms is different from conventional face-to-face transactions. Therefore, it is necessary to optimize and change several aspects of the consumer protection law so that it is able to cover consumer protection in e-commerce transactions. One of the dispute resolution processes is through the Online Dispute Resolution (ODR), which is a Development of Alternative Dispute Resolution (AD). ODR enables efficient dispute resolution through a faster and cheaper process.
MENAKAR KARAKTERISTIK PRODUK HUKUM HASIL PERUBAHAN KETIGA UNDANG-UNDANG MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI Suwiryo Prawira
Khairun Law Journal Volume 7 Issue 2, March 2024
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Khairun University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33387/klj.v7i2.7582

Abstract

Untuk menjamin perlindungan maksimal terhadap hak konstitusional, maka lembaga peradilan konstitusi harus diperkuat. Upaya tersebut harus didukung dengan instrumen hukum atau sistem yang baik. Melalui peluang revisi ketiga UU MK, alih-alih mampu menjawab seluruh permasalahan yang ada, produk legislasi hasil perubahan ketiga UU MK justru merendahkan kedudukan lembaga peradilan konstitusi. Banyak sekali permasalahan dalam proses pembentukan undang-undang yang secara sadar menunjukkan betapa pola intervensi pemerintah terhadap Mahkamah Konstitusi semakin kental, hal ini terlihat dari sifat produk hukum yang dihasilkan sangat jauh dari cita-cita reformasi. Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji karakteristik Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2020 yang merupakan produk hukum hasil perubahan ketiga UU Mahkamah Konstitusi. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum doktrinal, dengan pendekatan undang-undang dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menemukan bahwa proses revisi undang-undang Mahkamah Konstitusi mempunyai permasalahan prosedur formal. Kondisi tersebut dengan sendirinya mempengaruhi materi muatan Undang-undang tersebut. Berdasarkan indikator karakteristik produk hukum yaitu proses terbentuknya, muatan materiil dan peluang penafsiran undang-undang menunjukkan bahwa produk hukum tersebut merupakan hasil perubahan terhadap ketiga undang-undang tersebut. Konstitusi Mahkamah Konstitusi bersifat elitis konservatif. .
PENINGKATAN PERAN PEMERINTAH DALAM MELINDUNGI HAM KAUM DIFABEL Phireri Phireri; Muhammad Akbar Fhad Syahril; Muhammad Mufti M. Djafar
Khairun Law Journal Volume 7 Issue 2, March 2024
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Khairun University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33387/klj.v7i2.7384

Abstract

Decent work and livelihoods for humanity are part of human rights for everyone, including people with disabilities, so the 1945 Constitution provides guarantees and legal protection for their implementation. The problem is the discriminatory attitude towards persons with disabilities and the low level of education of persons with disabilities as a gap between people with disabilities and non-disabled workers. The absence of exact data related to the number of workers with disabilities both in the private sector and non-private sectors (PNS, BUMN and BUMD) raises its own problems in the protection of persons with disabilities. The quota of minimum requirement is 2 percent as a mandatory for the government, local government, BUMN, and BUMD and 1 percent for private companies from the number of employees or workers in the Disability Act is apparently not enough to provide protection for people with disabilities. This research is a normative legal research to examine the laws and regulations in order to obtain justice for persons with disabilities. This becomes very important as a form of government commitment through supervision and improvement of policies becomes very important so that persons with disabilities get decent work and livelihoods.
ANALISIS PERTIMBANGAN HUKUM HAKIM DALAM PUTUSAN PENGADILAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI PADA TINGKATAN PENGADILAN YANG BERBEDA (STUDI PUTUSAN PERKARA TIPIKOR DANA DESA TUGUIS KABUPATEN HALMAHERA UTARA TAHUN 2022) Jitro Sulani; Faissal Malik; Anshar Anshar
Khairun Law Journal Volume 7 Issue 2, March 2024
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Khairun University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33387/klj.v7i2.7609

Abstract

This article discusses legal considerations in court decisions on corruption of village funds at two different court levels based on Decision Number 5/Pid.Sus-TPK/2022/PN Tte at the first level and Decision Number 6/Pid.Sus-TPK/2022/PT Tte at the appeal level. The legal issue lies in the difference in judges' legal considerations related to the application of Article 2 paragraph (1) and Article 3 of the Corruption Eradication Law. This research uses normative legal research with secondary data sourced from primary and secondary legal materials. In the data collection process, data collection techniques are used by means of literature studies which are then processed and analyzed qualitatively. The panel of judges who examined and tried the case of corruption of village funds based on the Corruption Court Decision at the North Maluku High Court Number 6/Pid.Sus-TPK/2022/PT Tte after examining based on legal facts had a different view from the panel of judges at the previous level. The judge at the high court level after examining the case file and based on the legal facts in the trial at the first level concluded that what was proven was not the primary charge of Article 2 paragraph (1) but the secondary charge of Article 3 with all legal considerations. However, in relation to the punishment imposed by the judge at the higher level, there is no difference with the form of punishment imposed by the judge at the first level. Both the imposition of imprisonment, fines and additional punishment in the form of payment of restitution.
MEMAKNAI KEKUASAAN KEHAKIMAN SEBAGAI MATERI MUATAN UUD NRI TAHUN 1945 : PERKEMBANGAN DAN TUJUANNYA Supriyadi A Arief
Khairun Law Journal Volume 7 Issue 2, March 2024
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Khairun University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33387/klj.v7i2.7572

Abstract

Kekuasaan kehakiman sebagai salah satu materi muatan dalam konstitusi tertulis suatu negara hukum tidak dapat dipisahkan dari konsepsi trias politica. Hal tersebut dimaksudkan untuk menjamin independensi para hakim dalam membentuk hukum melalui putusannya sekaligus untuk mencegah penyalahgunaan kekuasaan. Dalam hal ini, penting membuktikan maksud tersebut telah sesuai dengan substansi kekuasaan kehakiman dalam materi muatan UUD 1945. Atas dasar tersebut, kajian ini dibatasi dalam dua pokok bahasan, yakni tentang sejauh mana latar belakang kekuasaan kehakiman menjadi materi muatan dalam UUD 1945 serta kedudukan kekuasaan kehakiman sebagai materi muatan dalam UUD 1945. Kedua hal tersebut akan dianalisa secara normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan sejarah. Adapun hasil akhir dari kajian ini menunjukkan bahwa walaupun terjadi pergantian rezim pemerintahan, bentuk negara hingga perubahan UUD 1945, kekuasaan kehakiman tetap menjadi materi muatan yang penting dan mendasar dalam UUD 1945. Salah satu proses pembentukan hukum dapat terjadi pada badan peradilan melalui putusan hakim, oleh sebab itu substansi perubahan dalam UUD 1945 bertujuan untuk meneguhkan independensi kekuasaan kehakiman sekaligus penguatan prinsip pemisahan kekuasaan utamanya dalam bagian kekuasaan kehakiman sebagai bentuk checks and balances

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5

 1 

Filter by Year

2024 2024


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Volume 7 Issue 2, March 2024 Volume 7 Issue 1, September 2023 Volume 6 Issue 2, March 2023 Vol 5, No 2 (2022): Maret 2022 Volume 6 Issue 1, September 2022 Volume 5 Issue 2, March 2022 Volume 5 Issue 1, September 2021 Volume 4 Issue 2, March 2021 Volume 4 Issue 1, September 2020 Volume 3 Issue 2, March 2020 Vol 3, No 1 (2019): Volume 3 Issue 1, September 2019 Vol 2, No 2 (2019): Volume 2 Issue 2, March 2019 Vol 2, No 1 (2018): Volume 2 Issue 1, September 2018 Vol 1, No 2 (2018): Volume 1 Issue 2, March 2018 Vol 1, No 1 (2017): Volume 1 Issue 1, September 2017 More Issue