cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Rizal Kamsurya
Contact Email
rizal_kamsurya@stkipmnc.ac.id
Phone
+6285243611246
Journal Mail Official
imeij@indo-intellectual.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Panjang No.1, RT.1/RW.3, Kedoya Utara, Kec. Kb. Jeruk, Kota Jakarta Barat, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta 11520 Dusun Kotania Atas, Desa Eti Kec. Seram Barat Kabupaten Seram Bagian Barat Propinsi Maluku
Location
Kab. seram bagian barat,
Maluku
INDONESIA
Indo-MathEdu Intellectuals Journal
Published by Lembaga Intelektual Muda Maluku
ISSN : 28085604     EISSN : 28085078     DOI : 10.54373
Core Subject : Education,
Mathematics
Indo-MathEdu Intellectuals Journal is a fully refereed (double-blind peer review) and an open-access online journal for academics, researchers, graduate students, early-career researchers and students, published by Lembaga Intelektual Muda (LIM) Maluku. IMEIJ is a periodical publication (two times a year, in March and September) with the primary objective to disseminate scientific articles in the fields of mathematics education. IMEIJ is indexed by Directory of Open Access Journals, Indonesian Scientific Journal Database, Google Scholar, and several others including Crossref,
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Pendidikan
Articles 4 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 1 No. 1 (2020): Indo-MathEdu Intellectuals Journal (IMEIJ)" : 4 Documents clear
Application of Active Debate Methods in Improving Student Learning Outcomes Wa Mira La Hasu; Citra Ratifa La Apu
Indo-MathEdu Intellectuals Journal Vol. 1 No. 1 (2020): Indo-MathEdu Intellectuals Journal (IMEIJ)
Publisher : Lembaga Intelektual Muda (LIM) Maluku

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research is backgrounded because of the lack of mathematics teachers in applying learning methods that are in accordance with the characteristics of students and the material to be taught so that it affects the quality of learning and learning outcomes in the classroom. This study aims to determine the application of active methods of debate in improving student learning outcomes. The type of research used is class action research which consists of four stages, namely action planning, action implementation, obervation and reflection with a total of 26 subjects. Data collection techniques are observation and tests. Observation is carried out to observe learning activities. The test is used to determine student learning outcomes after participating in learning activities with the application of the active method of debate. The results of data analysis on learning outcomes, before the action was 11.53% and after the action was carried out in the first cycle increased to 57.69% and again increased in cycle II, which was 96.15%. The average increase from precyclical to cycle I was 46.16% and from cycle I to cycle II was 49.99%. Meanwhile, the average score obtained by students in the pre-test was 50.09, after action in cycle I increased to 67.69 and again increased in cycle II to 76.92. The average value of the increase from pre-cycle to cycle I was 17.6 and from cycle I to cycle II increased by 9.23.
Profile of Student Learning Outcomes on the Concept of Sorting Numbers with a Realistic Mathematcs Education Omas Tuankotta; La Suha Ishabu; Rosmaryn Tutupary
Indo-MathEdu Intellectuals Journal Vol. 1 No. 1 (2020): Indo-MathEdu Intellectuals Journal (IMEIJ)
Publisher : Lembaga Intelektual Muda (LIM) Maluku

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to determine the profile of student learning outcomes on the concept of sequencing numbers with a Realistic Mathematics Education in grade I SD Muhammadiyah Ambon. The type of research used in this study is Descriptive Quantitative, which is research that aims to obtain data and describe the profile of student learning outcomes. The subjects of this study were all grade I students of SD Muhammadiyah Ambon, totaling 30 people. The variable used in this study is a single variable, namely the profile of student learning outcomes. The instruments used in data collection are test questions and observation guidelines. Data analysis is carried out descriptively, namely calculating the average score and percentage of completion of learning students. The results of the analysis show that it can be concluded that, on average, learning outcomes using the Realistic Mathematics Education achieved quite maximum student learning outcomes. Based on the results of the analysis of students' initial test scores, the average score was 58.33 with a percentage of completion as much as (26.67%) and increased in the final test results to 88.33 with a complete percentage of 93.33%. The number of students who achieved a minimum completion score on the initial test amounted to 8 students and increased in the final test by 28 students
The Relationship Between Problem Solving Methods and Student Learning Outcomes Wa Jumina; Syahrir Syahrir; Mahatma Mahatma
Indo-MathEdu Intellectuals Journal Vol. 1 No. 1 (2020): Indo-MathEdu Intellectuals Journal (IMEIJ)
Publisher : Lembaga Intelektual Muda (LIM) Maluku

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to determine the relationship between problem solving learning methods and student learning outcomes in trigonometry material. The type of research used in this study is descriptive quantitative, which is a study that aims to determine the magnitude of the relationship between problem solving learning methods and student learning outcomes in trigonometry material. The sample was selected using the cluster random sampling technique and obtained by 28 students. Research variables consist of problem solving methods (X) and learning outcomes (Y). The instruments used are tests and questionnaires. The test is used to determine student learning outcomes and questionnaires are used to determine the use of problem solving learning methods in the learning process. The data analysis technique used is Product Moment Correlation. The results of the data analysis obtained rhitung value = 0.7417 While the conversion results based on the rtabel value distribution table were obtained at the level of 5% which was 0.347 and at the level of 1 % of 0.478. So that it can be written into rvalue ≥ rtable or 0.7417 ≥ 0.347 at the level of 5% and rvalue ≥ rtable or 0.7417 ≥ 0.478 at the testing level of 1% or in other words, there is a strong relationship between problem solving learning methods and student learning outcomes in trigonometry material or a large coefficient of determination of 55.01%.
Improving Student Learning Outcomes with the Application of Pendidikan Matematika Realistik Indonesia (PMRI) Indah Silvana Aprilia; Nur Awalia
Indo-MathEdu Intellectuals Journal Vol. 1 No. 1 (2020): Indo-MathEdu Intellectuals Journal (IMEIJ)
Publisher : Lembaga Intelektual Muda (LIM) Maluku

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Pendidikan Matematika Realistik Indonesia (PMRI) is a learning tool that places students as subjects in learning and the learning process uses real-world contexts as a medium in their learning so as to help students understand the material being studied. The purpose of this study is to determine the application of PMRI in the learning process to improve student learning outcomes in the Social Arithmetic material of students VII of SMP Amanah Bangsa. This research was conducted using Classroom Action Research, which is a study that aims to determine the improvement of student learning outcomes. The subjects used in the study were 30 people, namely the number of all grade VII students at SMP Amanah Bangsa. The instruments used are observation and test. After carrying out the research and going through the data analysis process, the results of the analysis showed that there was an increase in student learning outcomes with the application of PMRI, namely in the initial test obtained an average score of 44.00 with a percentage of completion of 23.33%, increased in cycle I to 64.00 with a percentage of completion of 56.67% and increased significantly in cycle II to 79.00 with a percentage of completion of 83.33%.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 4

 1 

Filter by Year

2020 2020


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 4 No. 3 (2023): Indo-MathEdu Intellectuals Journal (In-Press) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2023): Indo-MathEdu Intellectuals Journal Vol. 4 No. 1 (2023): Indo-MathEdu Intellectuals Journal Vol. 3 No. 2 (2022): Indo-MathEdu Intellectuals Journal Vol. 3 No. 1 (2022): Indo-MathEdu Intellectuals Journal Vol. 2 No. 2 (2021): Indo-MathEdu Intellectuals Journal Vol. 2 No. 1 (2021): Indo-MathEdu Intellectuals Journal Vol. 2 No. 1 (2021): Indo-MathEdu Intellectuals Journal (IMEIJ) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2020): Indo-MathEdu Intellectuals Journal Vol. 1 No. 1 (2020): Indo-MathEdu Intellectuals Journal (IMEIJ)