cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Dwi Wulan Pujriyani
Contact Email
marcapada@stpn.ac.id
Phone
+628112652235
Journal Mail Official
marcapada@stpn.ac.id
Editorial Address
Sekolah Tinggi Pertanahan Nasional, Jalan Tata Bumi, No. 5, Banyuraden, Gamping, Sleman Yogyakarta Kodepos: 55293
Location
Kab. sleman,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Marcapada: Jurnal Kebijakan Pertanahan
Published by Sekolah Tinggi Pertanahan Nasional
ISSN : -     EISSN : 28088484     DOI : https://doi.org/10.31292/jm.v1i1
Core Subject : Science, Agriculture, Social,
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
Focus and Scope MARCAPADA: Jurnal Kebijakan Pertanahan is a scientific journal that focuses on agrarian-land issues, spatial planning, land management, problems that arise as the causes of a land policy. All terminology refers to the keyword "Policy" which intersects with Agrarian-Land. Land policy issues are built with multidisciplinary analysis, as they relate to scientific disciplines: Spatial, Social-humanities, and Technology. Technically, the Marcapada journal will contain research articles, brief policy studies, and broad land policy thinking. Strategic policy-related issues: Land Use (Land Use) Land Value Land Tenure and Land Tenure Land Development (Land Development) Land Infrastructure (Land Infrastructure) Land Policy Evaluation Policy and Conflict Resolution Spatial Structuring Policy Empowerment Policies and Strategies
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Administrasi Publik
Articles 6 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 2 No. 1 (2022): Marcapada: Jurnal Kebijakan Pertanahan" : 6 Documents clear
Analysis of the Job Creation Act (UUCK) Mandate Through Government Regulation Number 18 of 2021 Arif Tri Wibowo; Dzulhidayah Kinanggi
Marcapada: Jurnal Kebijakan Pertanahan Vol. 2 No. 1 (2022): Marcapada: Jurnal Kebijakan Pertanahan
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Pertanahan Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31292/mj.v2i1.21

Abstract

Agrarian conflicts occur from legal politics in the land sector, where the rules issued by the government are not compatible or contradictory. The Job Creation Act (UUCK) provides convenience in various regulatory aspects such as in the land sector, one of the implementing regulations is Government Regulation no. 18 of 2021. This study focuses more on analyzing with the intention to show a comparison of regulations that have been issued before and after the Job Creation Act as a regulation arrangement in the land sector through Government Regulation No. 18 Year 2021. The author uses a quali­tative method through a statute approach by collecting data and information and interpreting matters relating to relevant objects to draw conclusions. The results of the analysis show that the Job Creation Act has produced implementing regulations for at least 5 (five) government regulations in the land sector to cut previous regulations and reorganize regulations. Govern­ment Regulation No. 18 of 2021 provides new scope arrangements such as arrangements for Right to Manage (HPL), Land Reclamation, Land Destroyed, Space Above Land (RAT) and Underground Space (RBT). Government Regula­tion No. 18 of 2021 cut overlapping regulations in the land sector so that in their implementation, they can be aligned according to objectives by priori­tizing the interests of the wider community and minimizing agrarian conflicts. However, the birth of Government Regulation No. 18 of 2021 raises prob­lems and does not refer to the Basic Agrarian Law as a special law.
Re-Scanning the Electronic Certificate Infrastructure (Sertipikat-el) Diah Retno Wulan; M. Nazir Salim; Trisnanti Widi Rineksi
Marcapada: Jurnal Kebijakan Pertanahan Vol. 2 No. 1 (2022): Marcapada: Jurnal Kebijakan Pertanahan
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Pertanahan Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31292/mj.v2i1.24

Abstract

An electronic certificate (Sertipikat-el) results from a series of electronic land registration activities in electronic documents that should be digital eviden­ce. This paper describes the infrastructure of Sertipikat-el and offers steps that can be taken so that Sertipikat-el does not lose its essence as evidence of ownership and not ruled out in evidence at trial. Sertipikat-el in electronic documents does not violate the laws and regulations. Unfortunately, the electronic system used to create and manage Sertipikat-el does not meet all requirements so that it can guarantee that each component and the integration of all electronic systems continue to operate properly by minimizing the failure of electronic systems. Although Sertipikat-el has been determined in electronic documents, it has not been further regulated regarding data input and information. For this reason, there is a need for a complete revision of ministerial regulations and imple­men­tation related to electronic land registration at the technical level in the field. To ensure the used electronic system's essential function to create and manage the Sertipikat-el continues to run even in the event of a disaster or disruption, the electronic system needs to be registered. A reliability test and an audit from the competent agency are carried out. In addition, the system must also have archival functionality and be defined from the beginning whether the creation and management of Sertipikat-el are carried out in an electronic system or not because it will affect the method of presenting Sertipikat-el data as digital evidence at the trial.
Legalization of Land and Peatland Policy in Riau Fadhli Rasyid Pane
Marcapada: Jurnal Kebijakan Pertanahan Vol. 2 No. 1 (2022): Marcapada: Jurnal Kebijakan Pertanahan
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Pertanahan Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31292/mj.v2i1.25

Abstract

There is a conflict between the policy of new license termination in forest and peat areas with the legalization of land due to the interpretation of Presidential Instruction which is considered unsuitable. The policy obstructs the legalization of community land, which should be a priority for mapping and registration. For these conditions, this study is conducted to determine the overlap of regulations related to the one arranging the legalization of land, peatlands, and the Indicative Map of New License Termination (Peta Indikatif Penghentian Pemberian Izin Baru-PIPPIB). Specifically, the study examines the practices of land possession, ownership, use, and utilization policies in Air Hitam Village against spatial planning and Indicative Map of New License Termination policies. This research uses a qualitative method with a normative and spatial juridical approach. The results of the study found that there is an overlap of regulations in their implementation. The spatial analysis results showed that the area affected was about 66% of the area of the Air Hitam Village, and also not contained in the RTRW for Riau Province in 2018. While in Pekanbaru City, the RTRW in 2020 only contained peat-protected areas that were unsuitable. In conclusion, the PIPPIB policy obstructs the legalization of community land and causes economic losses and the absence of legal certainty of land rights for some communities in Air Hitam.
Declaration of Complete Land Registration in Buleleng Regency Putu Yoga Eka Sumarta; Asih Retno Dewi; Akur Nurasa
Marcapada: Jurnal Kebijakan Pertanahan Vol. 2 No. 1 (2022): Marcapada: Jurnal Kebijakan Pertanahan
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Pertanahan Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31292/mj.v2i1.26

Abstract

Accelerating land registration with Complete Systematic Land Registration (CSLR) is one of the agendas set by the Ministry of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency. Buleleng Regency as the most extensive district in Bali Province has a heavy burden in the implementation of CSLR. This is exacerbated by the absence of the archive of the Land Book (LB) and the old Measurement Letter (ML), which are the certificate issued before 1999, due to the burning of the Buleleng Regency Land Office building. The process of digitizing land data is experiencing obstacles. The descriptive method with a qualitative approach is used to explore strategies to improve the quality of digital data and land information to realize complete sub-districts/villages in Buleleng Regency. Some of the strategies pursued by the Buleleng Regency Land Office include 1) forming a complete sub-district development acceleration team; 2) socialization and coordination with the Buleleng Regency Government; 3) collaborating with Ganesha Education University in the use of students in textual validation of LB and ML as well as uploading the results of LB and ML scans; and 4) preparing the planning and implementation stages by the complete sub-district declaration acceleration team. Buleleng Regency Land Office has declared five complete sub-districts to have some impact on Buleleng Regency Land Office, Buleleng Regency Government, and the community, which in this case as holders of land rights certificates.
Agrarian Reform and Indigenous Peoples: Land Management Practices of Boti Tribe Dwi Wulan Pujiriyani; M. Nazir Salim; Maya Rahelia Soinbala
Marcapada: Jurnal Kebijakan Pertanahan Vol. 2 No. 1 (2022): Marcapada: Jurnal Kebijakan Pertanahan
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Pertanahan Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31292/mj.v2i1.27

Abstract

The viability of traditional tenure practices is being dealt with seriously by the privatization process. In this case, it is necessary to take sides to save the remnants of the collective heritage management of the community over shared resources, one of which appears in the context of Boti Tribe. Through Boti, the vertical redistribution model and the horizontal redistribution model can be reflected simultaneously. This vertical redistribution is related to the authority of customary leaders in regulating land tenure and use for all members of the community. Meanwhile, horizontal redistribution is related to resource management carried out among community members. This system works simultaneously and does not present feudal obligations as the base of production relationships built in the feudal hierarchical system. Boti tribe is included in the category of people who are still alive and have tribal customary land areas so that their existence can be confirmed. After receiving recognition from the local government, the identification process can be carried out by recording, measuring, and mapping. If the final product is the issuance of certificates, the only suitable protection mechanism in the case of Boti Tribe is through the issuance of communal certificates.
Analisis “Kegagalan” Pendaftaran Tanah Sistematis Lengkap di Kabupaten Pati Thezar Prymori Parenta
Marcapada: Jurnal Kebijakan Pertanahan Vol. 2 No. 1 (2022): Marcapada: Jurnal Kebijakan Pertanahan
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Pertanahan Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31292/mj.v2i1.29

Abstract

Cluster 3 is a product of the Complete Systematic Land Registration/ Pendaftaran Tanah Sistematis Lengkap (PTSL) where physical data collection has been carried out on PTSL objects, but the certificate cannot be issued due to several reasons behind it. Cluster 3 in the implementation of PTSL in Pati Regency is 83,873 fields, this number is an accumulation of cluster 3 within a period of three years, namely from 2019 to 2021 and there has been no significant effort made by the Pati Regency Land Office to suppress or solve the cluster 3 problem. The method used in this study is a qualitative method with observation and interview. The results of research that has been carried out in two villages in Pati Regency, namely Prawoto Village and Wegil Village show that the factors causing cluster 3 in the implementation of PTSL are unproductive soil conditions, the delivery of information on the implementation of PTSL that is not on target to the community, there is a concern for the community towards the land program. Another thing is that the ease of access to capital (without land certificates) in banks contributes to the refusal of people to be involved in PTSL. The author concludes that the state should take more appropriate approaches regarding the needs and guarantees of legal certainty over residents' land, because the legalization of assets in addition to the state's need to map all land is also to be able to guarantee the certainty of land owned by the community.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 6

 1 

Filter by Year

2022 2022


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023): Marcapada: Jurnal Kebijakan Pertanahan Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): Marcapada: Jurnal Kebijakan Pertanahan Vol. 2 No. 1 (2022): Marcapada: Jurnal Kebijakan Pertanahan Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022): Marcapada: Jurnal Kebijakan Pertanahan Vol. 1 No. 1 (2021): Marcapada: Jurnal Kebijakan Pertanahan