cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Andi Akram
Contact Email
sekretariatjurnalkumdil@gmail.com
Phone
+6221-29079286
Journal Mail Official
jurnalhukumperadilan@mahkamahagung.go.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Jend. A. Yani Kav. 58 Lt. 10 Cempaka Putih Jakarta Pusat
Location
Kota bogor,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan
Published by Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Hukum dan Peradilan MA RI
ISSN : 23033274     EISSN : 25281100     DOI : https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp
Core Subject : Economy, Social,
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan (JHP) is published by the Research Center for Law and Judiciary of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. JHP aimed to be a peer-reviewed platform and an authoritative source of information on legal and judiciary studies. The scope of JHP is analytical, objective, empirical, and contributive literature on the dynamics and development of legal studies, specifically in Indonesia. JHP welcomes scientific papers on a range of topics from research studies, judicial decisions, theoretical studies, literature reviews, philosophical and critical consultations that are analytical, objective, and systematic. However, from a wide range of topics that researchers can choose from, JHP puts more attention to the papers focusing on the sociology of law, living law, legal philosophy, history of national law, customary law, literature studies, international law, interdisciplinary, and empirical studies. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan (JHP) is a media dedicated to judicial personnel, academician, practitioners, and law expertise in actualizing the idea of research, development, and analysis of law and judiciary. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan comes out three times a year in March, July, and November.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 5 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 3, No 2 (2014)" : 5 Documents clear
PERBAIKAN PROSEDUR PENGUJIAN PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN DI MAHKAMAH AGUNG M Nur Sholikin
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 3, No 2 (2014)
Publisher : Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.3.2.2014.149-162

Abstract

Regulations under Laws which is the output of political and bureaucratic processes need to be supervised with a review mechanism by judicial power. Supreme Court as a judicial body have an authority to conduct the judicial review. The issue of the effectiveness procedures for judiical review regulation under law in the Supreme Court became the main topic of this research. This research is conducted through normative research methode, descriptive by studied legislation and other relevant library materials. The study concluded that the regulation and implementation for the judicial review application in the Supreme Court do not support the principles of transparency and accountability. Therefore, it is necessary to make revisions to the Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 Year 2011 on the Rights of the Judicial Review. Keywords: Procedures, Testing Laws and Regulations, the Supreme Court
PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA WAKAF DI PENGADILAN AGAMA Upi Komariah
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 3, No 2 (2014)
Publisher : Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.3.2.2014.117-126

Abstract

Waqf is a legal act wakif to separate and / or give up some of their wealth either permanently or for a specified period in accordance with its importance for religious purposes and / or general welfare according to sharia. (Article 1, paragraph 1 of Law No. 41 of 2004 on Waqf). Religious Court duty and authority to examine, decide, and resolve the matter in the first instance between people who are Muslims in the field; a). marriage; b). inheritance; c). wills; d). grants; e). endowments; f). zakat; g). infaq; h). Sadaqah; and i). Shariah economy. (Article 49 paragraph (1) of Law No. 7 of 1989 as amended by Act No. 3 of 2006 on the Religious Courts). In the event of a dispute endowments, the remedies are done first is through the efforts of deliberation, new if done then of deliberation not come to fruition, the solution sought by the Religious Courts Keywords: Dispute, Waqf, Islamic Court
URGENSI HARMONISASI POLA PROMOSI DAN MUTASI KEPANITERAAN LINGKUNGAN PERADILAN UMUM DAN AGAMA Budi Suhariyanto
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 3, No 2 (2014)
Publisher : Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.3.2.2014.177-190

Abstract

There is a different registrar promotion pattern and mutation on general to religious court. Accordingly, important to get promotion pattern harmony and mutation to taking on this differences among of court (in particular general to religious court) under the supreme of court. Some efforts to consider are: (1). The equality of regulation or types of regulation on registrar promotion pattern and mutation (which is synchonized on the head desicion supreme of court. (2). The regulatory separation promotion pattern and judges mutation to registrar on the head desicion supreme of court. (3). Regulatory harmony on the registrar promotion and mutation. Keyword: function, career, registrar
RANCANGAN UNDANG-UNDANG MAHKAMAH AGUNG (RUU MA) : PENGKAJIAN FILOSOFI, SEJARAH, ASAS, NORMA DALAM DINAMIKA PERKEMBANGAN KETATANEGARAAN INDONESIA Teguh Satya Bhakti
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 3, No 2 (2014)
Publisher : Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.3.2.2014.137-148

Abstract

Parliament proposed initiative to change back the bill MA for three (3) foundation: first, the desire of the House to form a Supreme Court that can carry kekusaan judiciary to realize the state of law and achieve the objectives of the state, second, the Law on the current MA , seen there are still weaknesses. Third, awareness of the need for harmonization and synchronization with the MA bill to be prepared with due regard to the interests of law enforcement and justice must be directly in line with the interests of law and public justice. According to the analysis, the substance of the bill by parliament yet the Supreme Court in accordance with the principles of independent judicial power, especially concerning: First, the House Oversight Against MA; Second, the Supreme Court decision setting tengang substance (Article 97), which not only violates the independency of the judiciary, but also waives the rule of law; Third, criminalization judge if the judge violated or ignored the Article 94 jo. Article 96; Fourth, the organizational structure of the secretariat of the Supreme Court (Article 35) causes a buildup of duties, functions and authority of the Secretariat tremendous MA; Fifth, the Material Test Procedure Law Rights (Article 90 paragraph (8)) are not further described; Sixth, Room Sharing Case that cause fattening of human resources in the rate and with the same duties and functions by the Clerk of the Supreme Court; and Seventh, Minimum Age Limits for Supreme Court Justices. Keywords: Bill, the Supreme Court, constitutional development
TESTIMONIUM DE AUDITU TELAAH PERSPEKTIF HUKUM ACARA PERDATA DAN FIQH Asmuni Asmuni
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 3, No 2 (2014)
Publisher : Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.3.2.2014.191-202

Abstract

The witness is the person or party who hear and know themselves what the testimony. However, there are also witnesses called testimonium de auditu namely hearing the testimony of others, meaning that the information obtained from another person or not known directly. This testimony is called the Shahadah according fiqh al Istifāḍah and some are calling it the bi al-Shahada al-Tasâmu'i. Theoretically, testimonium de auditu be a problem as opposed to the actual meaning of the witness. Therefore in practice, especially among the jurists' disagreement occurs. Departing from this disagreement, the problems discussed in the testimony of the strength of the testimony of two perspectives: in civil law and jurisprudence. From this exploratory study found that testimonium de auditu can not be used as direct evidence in the trial, but a testimony de auditu can be constructed by a judge as an allegation by a judge. While Shahada al Istifāḍah in Islamic civil law has the power and strength are perfect even on specific issues such as ownership and determination of offspring. Even the jurists' further states that the strength of this testimonium stronger testimony of two witnesses who qualify formal and material requirements. Keywords: Testimonium de Auditu, Procedural Law, Fiqh

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5

 1 

Filter by Year

2014 2014


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 12, No 3 (2023) Vol 12, No 2 (2023) Vol 12, No 1 (2023) Vol 11, No 3 (2022) Vol 11, No 2 (2022) Vol 11, No 1 (2022) Vol 10, No 3 (2021) Vol 10, No 2 (2021) Vol 10, No 1 (2021) Vol 9, No 3 (2020) Vol 9, No 2 (2020) Vol 9, No 1 (2020) Vol 8, No 3 (2019) Vol 8, No 2 (2019) Vol 8, No 1 (2019) Vol 7, No 3 (2018) Vol 7, No 2 (2018) Vol 7, No 1 (2018) Vol 6, No 3 (2017) Vol 6, No 2 (2017) Vol 6, No 1 (2017) Vol 5, No 3 (2016) Vol 5, No 2 (2016) Vol 5, No 1 (2016) Vol 4, No 3 (2015) Vol 4, No 2 (2015) Vol 4, No 1 (2015) Vol 3, No 3 (2014) Vol 3, No 2 (2014) Vol 3, No 1 (2014) Vol 2, No 3 (2013) Vol 2, No 2 (2013) Vol 2, No 1 (2013) Vol 1, No 3 (2012) Vol 1, No 2 (2012) Vol 1, No 1 (2012) More Issue