cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Muhammad Taufiq Fathaddin
Contact Email
muh.taufiq@trisakti.ac.id
Phone
+6285770946165
Journal Mail Official
jeeset_mtp@trisakti.ac.id
Editorial Address
Program Studi Magister Teknik Perminyakan (Master of Petroleum Engineering) Fakultas Teknologi Kebumian dan Energi Universitas Trisakti Gedung D Lantai 5 Universitas Trisakti, Jalan Kyai Tapa No.1 Grogol, Jakarta Barat, 11440, Indonesia.
Location
Kota adm. jakarta barat,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Journal of Earth Energy Science, Engineering, and Technology
Published by Universitas Trisakti
ISSN : 26153653     EISSN : 26140268     DOI : https://doi.org/10.25105/jeeset.v1i1
Core Subject : Science,
Energy
This journal intends to be of interest and utility to researchers and practitioners in the academic, industrial, and governmental institutions.
Arjuna Subject : Energi (semua kategori) - Energi Terbarukan, Keberlanjutan dan Lingkungan
Articles 5 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021): JEESET VOL. 4 NO. 1 2021" : 5 Documents clear
Post Treatment Acidizing Study on Carbonate Rock with Wormhole Radius Method Ageng Warasta; Ratnayu Sitaresmi; Pri Agung Rakhmanto; Esaim Mustafa Abrahim Omar
Journal of Earth Energy Science, Engineering, and Technology Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021): JEESET VOL. 4 NO. 1 2021
Publisher : Penerbitan Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (446.045 KB) | DOI: 10.25105/jeeset.v4i1.9059

Abstract

The problem that generally occurs in production activities is that wells in producing conditions has a low production rate. This could be due to the low permeability value of the reservoir or the increase of the skin factor of the reservoir due to formation damage. This matrix acidizing stimulation method is considered as an effective method in terms of activity costs and the success ratio in carbonate rocks. One of the successes of increasing the permeability around the well area depends on how far the wormholes are formed around the well. The results showed that the fractal dimension and wormhole radius model approach can be used to analyze the post treatment skin effect after validating the field data. Further analysis was carried out by involving limestone and dolomite reservoirs which have different characteristics in terms of porosity, permeability and fractal dimensions. The two reservoirs require different volumes of acid injection to produce the same reduction in skin factor. In this research, it is found that the parameters of permeability ratio, fractal dimensions, acid concentration, rock porosity and type of lithology affect the post treatment skin factor.
Application of Pressure Type Curve Matching for Characterizing the Naturally Fractured Reservoir Sri Feni Maulindani; Doddy Abdassah; Taufan Marhaendrajana; Suryo Prakoso; Muhammad Taufiq Fathaddin
Journal of Earth Energy Science, Engineering, and Technology Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021): JEESET VOL. 4 NO. 1 2021
Publisher : Penerbitan Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1875.102 KB) | DOI: 10.25105/jeeset.v4i1.9060

Abstract

Naturally fractured reservoirs have an important role in the production and reserves of hydrocarbons, where more than 40% of the oil and gas reservoir production comes from this reservoir type. There are two systems that affect the production mechanism in this reservoir, namely the matrix as a fluid source and fractures as a fluid transfer network to the wellbore. This study discusses the characterization of naturally fractured reservoirs using curve type matching. In this study, the Warren and Root model is applied to create a reservoir model that applies the fluid flow mechanism from the matrix to the fracture with pseudo steady state interporosity flow. Pressure transient analysis is commonly known and widely used by reservoir engineers as a tool to identify reservoir characteristics, where there are two important parameters that influence reservoir productivity, namely the ratio of the storativity coefficient (omega) and the interporosity flow coefficient (lamda). Based on the results of the analysis, it is found that the coefficients are strongly affected by the values of porosity fracture and permeability fracture also the productivity of the reservoir.
The Effect of Non- Ioic Surfactant in Gravity Drainage Processes in the Reservoir to Increase Oil Production at a Laboratory Scale Nanda Josenia Sainuka; Sugiatmo Kasmungin; Dwi Atty Mardiana
Journal of Earth Energy Science, Engineering, and Technology Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021): JEESET VOL. 4 NO. 1 2021
Publisher : Penerbitan Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (499.623 KB) | DOI: 10.25105/jeeset.v4i1.9061

Abstract

Chemical flooding is one of the methods used to increase oil recovery. One of the chemical flooding used is alkaline surfactant, where the alkaline and surfactant function is to reduce interface stress and form microemulsion . In this study, a screening of surfactant was conducted in order to determine which surfactants were compatible and then injected to increase oil production. The surfactants used in this study were non-ionic surfactants namely Poly Ethylene Glycol Monooleate (PEGM), Nonyl Phenol Ethoxylate (NP-6), Poly Ethylene Glycol Diolate (PD) and Sodium Dodecyl Benzene (SDB) with surfactant concentrations of 0.3 %, NaCL concentrations of 0%, 2% and 5%, and alkaline concentrations (NaOH and Na2CO3) of 0.05%, 0.1% and 0.5%. The result obtained from the measurement of Interfacial Tension (IFT) surfactant PEGM 3% at the brine concentration of 2% was 0.012638 Dyne/cm. After that imbibition testing was performed to perceive the ability of surfactants to bind oil in rock pores, the highest oil recovery was 75.7% in PEGM surfactant concentration of 0.3%, salinity of 2%, and NaOH alkaline of 1.2%.
Determination of Suitable KCl Polymer Mud Properties for POK Field Puri Wijayanti; Bayu Satiyawira; Andry Prima; Arinda Ristawati; Foggie Sciorra
Journal of Earth Energy Science, Engineering, and Technology Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021): JEESET VOL. 4 NO. 1 2021
Publisher : Penerbitan Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (592.16 KB) | DOI: 10.25105/jeeset.v4i1.9078

Abstract

Most oil and gas wellbores are drilled using water based mud (WBM), but this is the case when drilling through non-reactive formations that does not contain swelling shale. In reactive shale formation, KCl Polymer additive should be added to the mud. It will provide a source of potassium ions which will help stabilizing the reactive shale. So that the swelling process is minimized. The basis of the KCL polymer mud system is the polymer used as a wrapper for rock pieces during borehole cleaning process. In the wells in the POK Field, the use of polymer KCL mud is evaluated on trajectories of 17½", 12¼", and 8½ ". The evaluation process uses parameters that aim to find the suitable mud properties that result in the best drilling performance in each trajectory in the POK Field well. The determination of the best drilling performance is based on drilling time. The parameters used in this research are: rate of penetration, trip time, yield point (YP), K+ content, mud weight (MW), viscosity (m), plastic viscosity (PV), and gel strength (GS), mud cake, pH, and additional parameter (excess cement). Based on analysis and investigation, the best drilling performance for trajectory of 17½" occured in POK 1075 well, while the best performance for the trajectories 12¼” and 8½” occured in POK 1058 well. Therefore the KCl polymer mud properties used in these wells can be used as a reference and basis for planning mud systems for the next wells.
Laboratory Study of Copper Nanoparticle Effect on Scale and Corrosion Rate in the Oil Field Reno Pratiwi; Lestari Lestari; Muhammad Burhannudinnur; Syamsul Irham; Lukas Lukas
Journal of Earth Energy Science, Engineering, and Technology Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021): JEESET VOL. 4 NO. 1 2021
Publisher : Penerbitan Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (213.792 KB) | DOI: 10.25105/jeeset.v4i1.9094

Abstract

The occurrence of corrosion and scale on production equipment is an obstacle that often occurs in oil and gas exploration activities. Physical and chemical properties of formation water that come out with oil from production wells are the main variables causing corrosion and scale. In recent years, developing nanotechnology provides many benefits in various industrial activities. One product that is becoming widely known is Copper Nano Particles (CuNPs) which have anti-biotic, anti-microbial, and anti-fungal agents which are soluble in water and can be used to protect / coat metals (superficial conductive coatings of metal and non-ferrous metal). The use of nanoparticles in oil and gas exploration activities is still very limited. Specifically, the CuNPs material, its anti-bacterial and anti-fungal properties have never been researched on the possible use in the oil field. In this study, it was observed the influence of the presence of CuNPs in formation water on the potential for scale formation and corrosion. Formation water obtained from production wells in the Wonocolo region, Cepu, Central Java, is used as a sample to test the effect of CuNPs on the scale and corrosion trends. Observations have shown that the CuNPs content test at various concentrations did not have a significant effect on formation water for its tendency to form scales. While the corrosivity of water seems to be quite influenced by the presence of CuNPs, where the addition of nanoparticle material is optimal at 0.01 ppm which can reduce corrosion rates up to 95%.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5

 1 

Filter by Year

2021 2021


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): JEESET VOL. 6 NO. 2 2023 Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): JEESET VOL. 6 NO. 1 2023 Vol. 5 No. 3 (2022): JEESET VOL. 5 NO. 3 2022 Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): JEESET VOL. 5 NO. 2 2022 Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): JEESET VOL. 5 NO. 1 2022 Vol. 4 No. 3 (2021): JEESET VOL. 4 NO. 3 2021 Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021): JEESET VOL. 4 NO. 2 2021 Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021): JEESET VOL. 4 NO. 1 2021 Vol. 3 No. 3 (2020): JEESET VOL. 3 NO. 3 2020 Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020): JEESET VOL. 3 NO. 2 2020 Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020): JEESET VOL. 3 NO. 1 2020 Vol. 2 No. 3 (2019): JEESET VOL. 2 NO. 3 2019 Vol. 2 No. 2 (2019): JEESET VOL. 2 NO. 2 2019 Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019): JEESET VOL. 2 NO. 1 2019 Vol. 1 No. 3 (2018): JEESET-VOL.1-NO.3-2018 Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018): JEESET-VOL.1-NO.2-2018 Vol. 1 No. 1 (2018): JEESET-VOL.1-NO.1-2018 More Issue