cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Agus Budianto
Contact Email
agus.budianto@uph.edu
Phone
+622125535168
Journal Mail Official
lexprospiciteditor@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Kampus Pascasarjana Universitas Pelita Harapan Plaza Semanggi lt. 16, Jl. Jend. Sudirman No. 50, RT.1/RW.4, Karet Semanggi, Kecamatan Setiabudi, Kota Jakarta Selatan, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta 12930
Location
Kota tangerang,
Banten
INDONESIA
Lex Prospicit 
Published by Universitas Pelita Harapan
ISSN : 29881781     EISSN : 29881773     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Lex Prospicit is a scientific journal published by the Master of Law Study Program, Faculty of Law, Universitas Pelita Harapan in collaboration with Asosiasi Advokat Indonesia (AAI) and serves as a venue for scientific information in the field of law resulting from scientific research or research-based scientific law writing. The articles published in this journal cover a broad range of topics, including Business Law, Antitrust and Competition Law, Intellectual Property Rights Law, Criminal Law, International Law, Constitutional Law, Administrative Law, Agrarian Law, Health Law, Adat Law, Environmental Law, Banking Law, Cyber Law, Bankruptcy Law, WTO Law, Investment Law, Tax Law, Human Rights Law, ADR and Arbitration Law, and Labor Law.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 10 Documents
 1 
DOUBLE PUNISHMENT IN THE WAITING TIME FOR DEATH PENALTY: A STUDY OF HUMAN RIGHTS PROTECTION IN INDONESIA Sahat Marulitua Sidabukke
Lex Prospicit Vol 1, No 1: February 2023
Publisher : Universitas Pelita Harapan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lp.v1i1.6634

Abstract

In Indonesia, until 2022 there were 428 people who have been sentenced with death penalty by anaesthetics and were still waiting for their execution to be carried out. Among those people, 101 have been sitting in the death row for more than 10 years. This means that those who are sentenced to death by the court (inkracht van gewijsde) were imprisoned for life until their execution. They had to carry out two kinds of punishments, videlicet death penalty and imprisonment. There is a lengthy waiting time, which results in the neglect of death row convicts' rights. This is a normative juridical research with data collected through literature study, court decision analysis, and concept test in focus group discussion attended by Supreme Prosecutor, Supreme Court, National Narcotics Agency, State Police of Republic of Indonesia and National Commission of Human Rights. The result of this research shows that such waiting period creates distrust between judicial institutions. It also creates uncertainty and becomes a loophole for death row inmates to apply for unlimited legal remedies which causes delay of the execution of the death penalty. On the other hand, the role of the Public Prosecutor as the executioner of death penalty is not yet optimal. Because of the two reasons above (legal remedies and political will), they worry about potentially being considered as violating human rights. 
Optimalization of the Application of Act Number 22 of 2022 Concerning Companies in Overcoming Problems of Management of Corporate Institutions (Lapas) in Indonesia Tasya Einakrisda Sheiba
Lex Prospicit Vol 1, No 2: July 2023
Publisher : Universitas Pelita Harapan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lp.v1i2.6672

Abstract

The purpose of correctional systems is to improve the quality of personality and independence of inmates so that they are aware of their mistakes, improve themselves, and not repeat criminal acts, so that they can be accepted again by the community, can live normally as good citizens, obey the law, be responsible, and can play an active role in development. However, this correctional goal cannot be realized properly and optimally if the problems that exist in prisons are still not resolved properly. The type of research used in this paper is a type of empirical normative research. Collecting data using literature study methods and also interviews through the Forum Group Discussion (FGD), with the type of approach to legal systematics and Non-Judicial Case Study as well as data analysis in the form of qualitative research. Based on the research that the author did, can conclude that problems related to overcapacity, prison facilities and infrastructure, and human resources (prison officers) can be overcome by the establishment of Law Number 22 of 2022, but problems related to halinar cannot yet be resolved by Law No. 22 of 2022. The form of optimization strategy that can be done to overcome problems in prisons is to optimize the coaching activities provided to inmates, where prisoners become more active, not just as observers, apply restorative justice in prisons and one example is by providing a special room for mothers and children, as well as forming the National Correctional Agency (BAPASNAS).
REPOSISI KEDUDUKAN DAN KEWENANGAN PENYIDIK PEGAWAI NEGERI SIPIL (PPNS) DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA INDONESIA [REPOSITION OF POSITION AND AUTHORITY OF PPNS IN THE INDONESIAN CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM] Oloan C. H. Marpaung
Lex Prospicit Vol 1, No 1: February 2023
Publisher : Universitas Pelita Harapan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lp.v1i1.6635

Abstract

PPNS in its position and authority as the embodiment of law enforcement, it can be seen that there is subordination of other law enforcement sub-systems. The purpose of this paper is to reposition the position and authority of the PPNS in the Criminal Justice System so they are not seen as subordinate and placed as assistants to Police Investigators. The formulation of the problem in this study are the position and authority of PPNS in the Indonesian criminal justice system and legal certainty about the position and authority of PPNS in the criminal justice system in Indonesia. This research is a normative-empirical research conducted by analyzing the implementation of normative legal provisions (laws) with a case study approach, then in analyzing the data using a deductive method, namely drawing conclusions from a problem faced that is specific. The results of this study are that the existence of PPNS is very much needed in conducting investigations due to the complexity of the investigation, the existence of special crimes, and the limitations of Polri investigators. Regarding the implementation of the duties of civil servants so that there is no overlap between Polri investigators and PPNS, the government has set various regulations regarding the mechanism for the appointment and dismissal of PPNS, as well as the implementation of coordination and supervision carried out by Polri investigators against PPNS.Bahasa Abstrak Indonesia: PPNS dalam kedudukan maupun kewenangannya sebagai perwujudan dari penegak hukum, dapat diketahui terjadinya sub-ordinasi atas sub-sistem penegak hukum yang lain. Tujuan dari penulisan ini adalah menempatkan kembali (reposisi) kedudukan dan kewenangan PPNS dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana sehingga tidak terlihat sebagai subordinasi dan ditempatkan sebagai pembantu Penyidik Kepolisian. Rumusan masalah dalam penelitian mengangkat hal kedudukan dan kewenangan PPNS dalam sistem peradilan pidana Indonesia dan kepastian hukum terhadap kedudukan dan kewenangan PPNS dalam sistem peradilan pidana di Indonesia. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian Normatif-Empiris yang dilakukan dengan menganalisis implementasi ketentuan hukum normatif (undang-undang) dengan pendekatan Pendekatan terhadap kasus hukum (case study), kemudian dalam penganalisian data menggunakan metode deduktif, yakni menarik kesimpulan dari suatu permasalahan yang dihadapi yang bersifat khusus.Hasil penelitian ini adalah keberadaan PPNS sangat dibutuhkan dalam melakukan penyidikan dikarenakan kompleksnya penyidikan, adanya tindak pidana yang bersifat khusus, dan keterbatasan dari Penyidik Polri. Terkait pelaksanaan tugas PNS agar harmonis dan tidak terjadi tumpang tindih antara Penyidik Polri dan PPNS, pemerintah telah menetapkan berbagai peraturan mengenai mekanisme pengangkatan dan pemberhentian PPNS, serta pelaksanaan koordinasi dan pengawasan yang dilakukan Penyidik Polri terhadap PPNS.
Obstruction of Justice by Lawyer Fredrich Yunadi in the Corruption Case of the E-KTP (Electronic Identity Card) Procurement Project Involving Former People's Representative Council Chairman Setya Novanto Daniel Halomoan; Figo Edsel Hidayat; Jaya Pahlevi; Rezki Tama A.P; Rofik Cahya Arta; William Rando Bayakta
Lex Prospicit Vol 1, No 2: July 2023
Publisher : Universitas Pelita Harapan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lp.v1i2.6947

Abstract

Many lawyers have encountered cases of legal obstruction, which raises concerns since advocates are a respected profession within law enforcement. This paper aims to: (1) provide examples of cases and explain the modus operandi and working system in the case of Fredrich Yunadi's legal obstruction; (2) examine how legal obstacles have become phenomena within the legal profession; (3) offer sociological and psychological perspectives from criminologists; and (4) investigate the implementation and process of punishment for the perpetrators. This research falls under the category of normative research, as the author examines library and secondary materials. The study reviews positive law and legal principles. Primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials serve as the data sources. The data collection method employed is library research or documentary studies. Based on the research findings, two main conclusions can be drawn. First, law enforcement actions in Indonesia have not effectively prevented advocates from being prosecuted for corruption, as not all legal subjects comply with relevant legal norms. This is influenced by three components of law enforcement: legal substance, law enforcement, and legal culture. Second, the connection between law enforcement and lawyers accused of obstructing justice with advocates' right to immunity is related to the fact that the position of advocates is vulnerable to intersect with obstruction of justice when advocates define their right to immunity without considering the limitations stipulated in laws and regulations. This highlights the importance of advocating a code of ethics for advocates.
IMPLEMENTASI KEBIJAKAN HUKUM PERDAGANGAN DI INDONESIA PADA SAAT TERJADINYA KOMPETISI DAGANG AMERIKA DENGAN CHINA [IMPLEMENTATION OF TRADE LAW POLICY IN INDONESIA AT THE TIME OF THE OCCURRENCE OF TRADE COMPETITION BETWEEN AMERICA AND CHINA] M. Rusdyanto Hadawang
Lex Prospicit Vol 1, No 1: February 2023
Publisher : Universitas Pelita Harapan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lp.v1i1.6671

Abstract

This research examines the policies issued by the Government of Indonesia, especially in trade law policies at the time of trade wars or trade competition between America and China. This study uses a type of normative research through a legal history approach, a conceptual approach, an approach to legal principles, and a legal political approach in order to achieve the research objectives, namely to present legal facts and examine the impact of trade competition between America and China on Indonesia in the field of trade law at the time of the occurrence of trade competition between America and China with conformity to the principles stipulated in Article 2 of Law Number 7 of 2014 concerning Trade. The results of the study show that the impact that is felt by Indonesia is illustrated in the presentation of data on Indonesia's fluctuating export-import activities and also exposure regarding regulations and policies resulting from negotiations between countries as stipulated in international trade agreements that have been ratified and applied to the people of Indonesia. The resulting conclusion is that due to trade competition between America and China, Indonesia has issued regulatory changes related to export-import activities and also provisions in the defense industry which regulate the involvement of the private sector in the manufacture of defense equipment, through changes in Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation and Law Number 16 of 2012 concerning the Defense Industry. Bahasa Indonesia Abstrak: Penelitian ini mengkaji tentang kebijakan yang dikeluarkan oleh Pemerintah Indonesia khususnya dalam kebijakan hukum perdagangan pada saat terjadinya perang dagang atau kompetisi dagang antara Amerika dengan China. Penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penelitian normatif melalui pendekatan sejarah hukum, pendekatan konseptual, pendekatan asas-asas hukum, serta pendekatan politik hukum guna mencapai tujuan penelitian yaitu untuk menyajikan fakta hukum dan mengkaji dampak kompetisi dagang antara Amerika dengan China terhadap Indonesia di bidang hukum perdagangan pada saat terjadinya kompetisi dagang antara Amerika dengan China dengan kesesuaian asas-asas yang diatur dalam Pasal 2 Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2014 tentang Perdagangan. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa dampak yang dirasakan Indonesia, tergambarkan dalam sajian data tentang kegiatan ekspor impor Indonesia yang fluktuatif dan juga pemaparan terkait regulasi dan kebijakan hasil perundingan antar negara yang dituang dalam perjanjian perdagangan internasional yang telah diratifikasi dan diberlakukan kepada masyarakat Indonesia. Kesimpulan yang dihasilkan bahwa dampak kompetisi dagang antara Amerika dengan China, Indonesia telah mengeluarkan perubahan regulasi terkait dengan kegiatan ekspor impor dan juga ketentuan dalam industri pertahanan yang mengatur keterlibatan pihak swasta dalam pembuatan alutsista, melalui perubahan dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja dan Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2012 tentang Industri Pertahanan.
Criminological Examination of The Premeditated Murder Perpetrated by Richard Eliezer in Case Law Number 798/Pid.B/2022/PN JKT.SEL Adzholla Hadzna Sungkar; Amanda Regina Pallas Heriman; Caroline Caroline; Muhammad Afif Efendi
Lex Prospicit Vol 1, No 2: July 2023
Publisher : Universitas Pelita Harapan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lp.v1i2.6941

Abstract

Murder cases in Indonesia often occur but there is one murder case committed by law enforcers. This harms the public view of law enforcement officials. On the other hand, we must be able to see this murder case from the perspective of the murderer, one of whom is Richard Eliezer in the murder case of Brigadier Joshua Hutabarat. Richard Eliezer was a policeman who killed another policeman, Joshua. In this murder we must be able to see from different perspectives such as the perspective of psychology, sociology and society so that everyone can judge whether the penalty that Richard Eliezer recevied was proper or not. The purpose of this research is to examine from the criminological perspective the premeditated murder perpetrated by law enforcement officers against their aides who should be under their guidance. The methodology used is normative, reinforced by primary data, especially in the material of Court Decision no. 798/Pid.B/2022, statements from witnesses in this premeditated murder case. Then, analyze with secondary data and the law system in the police. It is found that psychology of abuse of power often involves analyzing the motivations and behaviors of individuals who abuse power, as well as the factors that influence and prevent such behavior related to the penalty imposed in the case law, seen from perspectives such as the psychology, sociology and society.
PERSYARATAN E-COMMERCE MERUGIKAN KONSUMEN PADA TRANSAKSI BARANG ELEKTRONIK DI MARKETPLACE [E-COMMERCE REQUIREMENTS HARMING CONSUMERS IN ELECTRONIC GOODS TRANSACTIONS IN THE MARKETPLACE] Widya Fitri Adilia
Lex Prospicit Vol 1, No 1: February 2023
Publisher : Universitas Pelita Harapan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lp.v1i1.6680

Abstract

Issues related to consumer rights are often neglected in the era of digital technology and the laws and regulations of Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection are felt to be increasingly irrelevant. Many are still found in e-commerce transactions through marketplaces, which ignore consumer rights through digital requirements made unilaterally by business actors. This writing is focused on the purchase of electronic goods by consumers in e-commerce transactions through marketplaces, so that a formulation of the problem is compiled about how the forms of e-commerce requirements are burdensome and detrimental to consumers in electronic goods transactions in the marketplace, and how are consumers' efforts to obtain rights to goods electronics purchased in the marketplace when viewed from a review of Indonesian law. The writing methodology is carried out by using empirical normative research to assist in solving problems in the field of consumer protection law and assisting in the discovery of ideas for the development of legal science in providing protection for consumer rights in the digital technology era. E-commerce requirements that are burdensome and detrimental to consumers in electronic goods transactions in the marketplace are in the form of standard clauses in which there are still many provisions that violate the contents of Article 18 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. Efforts by consumers to obtain rights to electronic goods purchased in the marketplace within existing regulatory provisions, that law in Indonesia still does not have specific standard requirements, and a form of supervision to take firm action against marketplace business actors who violate the provisions prohibiting the standard clauses included in the requirements e-commerce transactions.  Bahasa Indonesia Abstrak: Permasalahan terkait hak konsumen yang sering terabaikan di era teknologi digital, peraturan perundang-undangan dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen dirasa sudah semakin kurang relevan. Masih banyak ditemukan dalam transaksi e-commerce melalui marketplace, yang mengabaikan hak-hak konsumen melalui persyaratan digital yang dibuat sepihak oleh pelaku usaha. Penulisan ini difokuskan pada pembelian barang elektronik oleh konsumen dalam transasksi e-commerce melalui marketplace, sehingga disusun sebuah rumusan masalah tentang bagaimanakah bentuk persyaratan e-commerce yang memberatkan dan merugikan konsumen pada transaksi barang elektronik di marketplace, serta bagaimana upaya konsumen untuk mendapatkan hak atas barang elektronik yang dibeli di marketplace bila dilihat dari tinjauan hukum Indonesia. Metodologi penulisan dilakukan dengan menggunakan jenis penelitian normatif empiris guna membantu dalam memecahan persoalan di bidang hukum perlindungan konsumen dan membantu penemuan gagasan pengembangan ilmu hukum dalam memberikan perlindungan hak konsumen di era teknologi digital. Persyaratan e-commerce yang memberatkan dan merugikan konsumen pada transaksi barang elektronik di marketplace ialah berupa klausula baku yang isinya masih banyak ditemukan ketentuan yang melanggar isi Pasal 18 Ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. Upaya konsumen untuk mendapatkan hak atas barang elektronik yang dibeli di marketplace dalam ketentuan regulasi yang ada, bahwa hukum di Indonesia masih belum memiliki standar persyaratan khusus, dan bentuk pengawasan untuk menindak tegas para pelaku usaha marketplace yang melanggar ketentuan larangan klausula baku yang dicantumkan di dalam persyaratan transaksi e-commerce.
The Existence of Notary Cooperation with Online Service Bureaus in the Making of Deeds of Establishment of Limited Liability Companies Clarissa Chrysilla; Reinard Yudhaprawira
Lex Prospicit Vol 1, No 2: July 2023
Publisher : Universitas Pelita Harapan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lp.v1i2.7597

Abstract

Notaries are authorized to mold all actions, agreements, and determinations desired by the parties who come to them to confirm them and pour into an authentic deed, aiming for the deed to have complete evidential power and validity. Therefore, notaries are obliged to fulfill all the provisions of their positions and other regulations and are responsible for the deeds they have prepared. In practice, especially since Covid-19 there are still notaries who cooperate with online service bureaus. The type of study is empirical juridical, which in other words is a type of sociological legal research, also known as field research, which examines the applicable legal provisions and what happens in reality in the community. From the research results obtained from decision No.36/PID.SUS/TPK/2014/PN.JKT.PST in conjunction with Cassation Court Decision No. 980 K/Pid.Sus/2015, that a notary does not check documents (the ID Card) in the creation of a company, and they aren’t to meet directly before the Notary, but with a service bureau. In this case, it is related to the validity of the company establishment deed that has been made by a notary in collaboration with an online service bureau, where the appearer does not appear before the notary because the one who appears before the notary is the service bureau. One of the main advantages of notary cooperation with online service bureaus is of course that it is not bound by working time. That the cooperation between the notaries does not have a written work bond but only in the form of verbal, however, such actions still violate the UUJN and the Notary Code of Ethics, and there have been lacunae in the law to regulate cooperation between notary and online service bureau. In the case that the author raises, notary cooperation with service bureaus is prone to criminal acts (corruption or fraud), therefore the company's deed of establishment becomes null and void. Second, the responsibility of the Notary Professional Organization, towards the Notary who cooperates with the online service bureau, which violates the provisions of the UUJN and the Code of Ethics, then based on Article 4 number 4 of the Notary Code of Ethics, it is said that the act of cooperating with an online service bureau is categorized as a violation of the notary code of ethics, which is accompanied by sanctions in the form of: Reprimand; Warning; Temporary dismissal from Association membership; Honorable dismissal from Association membership; and Dishonorable dismissal from Association membership. The INI's responsibility as a notary professional organization is as a form of providing duties and authority in providing guidance, supervision and protection to notaries.
REGULATION FOR E-COMMERCE PLATFORM PROVIDERS IN INDONESIA: IMPORTANCE AND EFFECTIVENESS Jemy Vestius Confido
Lex Prospicit Vol 1, No 1: February 2023
Publisher : Universitas Pelita Harapan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lp.v1i1.6703

Abstract

Indonesia is a country with the largest digital economy potential in Southeast Asia as indicated by number of its internet user especially through mobile access. This huge potential begins to realize with the presence of electronic commerce (e-Commerce) services which grow very fast and very vastly. The presence of e-Commerce has stimulated many new social phenomena, which are mainly triggered by e-Commerce platform providers who intensively perform marketing activities. This situation will become the real law (das sein) if it is not governed by law.The purpose of this research is to analyze the importance and effectiveness of existing regulations regarding e-Commerce platform providers in Indonesia. The research applies normative juridical method that uses applicable laws and regulations relevant to the issues as the primary sources supported by empirical cases as the secondary sources. From theoretical perspective, responsive law theory and the principle of lex specialis derogat legi generali are applied in this research. The applied positive laws must be assured for their responsiveness toward social needs while the specific characteristics of e-Commerce are entirely considered. Legal comparisons with international laws and other countries are also included to enrich the analysis.The research concludes that the Government Regulation Number 80 of year 2019 regarding Trading through Electronic System is very important to regulate e-Commerce environment in Indonesia. However, the enforcement of this regulation is not fully effective. The government of Indonesia could apply the regulation to facilitate healthy e-Commerce growth with comprehension towards business perspective and building trust to stimulate expected responses. Effective implementation of comprehensive e-Commerce regulation will strengthen the nation’s digital economy and overall economic resilience. Specific legal arrangements for e-Commerce platform providers should not paralyze the business. Instead, more persuasive approaches with good communication and trust will stimulate positive benefits to all related parties.Bahasa Indonesia Abstrak: Indonesia merupakan negara dengan potensi ekonomi digital terbesar di Asia Tenggara sebagaimana diindikasikan oleh jumlah pengguna internet khususnya yang menggunakan akses seluler. Potensi yang besar ini mulai terwujud menjadi nyata dengan kehadiran layanan perdagangan elektronik atau e-Commerce yang tumbuh secara cepat dan besar. Kehadiran e-Commerce telah memicu fenomena-fenomena sosial yang utamanya didorong oleh penyedia layanan platform e-Commerce yang secara intensif melakukan aktivitas pemasaran. Situasi ini akan menjadi hukum yang digunakan (das sein) jika tidak ditata oleh regulasi hukum.Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisa pentingnya dan keefektifan dari regulasi yang sudah ada mengenai penyedia platform e-Commerce di Indonesia.  Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif yang bertumpu kepada hukum dan regulasi yang diberlakukan sesuai dengan isu tersebut sebagai sumber utama dengan didukung kasus-kasus empiris sebagai sumber pelengkap. Dari sudut pandang teoritis, teori hukum responsif dan asas lex specialis derogat legi generali digunakan sebagai alat analisis dalam penelitian ini. Hukum positif yang diberlakukan harus dipastikan  bersifat responsif terhadap kebutuhan masyarakat sedangkan karakteristik khusus dari e-Commerce harus seluruhnya dipertimbangkan. Perbandingan dengan hukum international dan negara-negara lain juga digunakan untuk memperkaya analisis.Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 80 Tahun 2019 tentang Perdagangan Melalui Sistem Elektronik sangatlah penting untuk mengatur lingkungan e-Commerce di Indonesia. Namun demikian, penegakan dari peraturan ini tidak sepenuhnya efektif. Pemerintah Indonesia bisa menerapkan peraturan ini untuk memfasilitasi pertumbuhan e-Commerce yang sehat dengan pemahaman terhadap perspektif bisnis dan pembentukan kepercayaan untuk merangsang response yang diharapkan. Implementasi yang efektif dari peraturan e-Commerce yang komprehensif akan memperkuat ekonomi digital dan keseluruhan daya tahan ekonomi nasional. Pengaturan khusus terhadap penyedia platform e-Commerce seyogyanya tidak melumpuhkan bisnis. Sebaliknya, pendekatan yang lebih persuasif dengan komunikasi yang baik dan kepercayaan akan mendorong manfaat positif baik semua pihak terkait.
Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Artificial Intellegence Dalam Aspek Penyalahgunaan Deepfake Technology Pada Perspektif UU PDP dan GDPR [Legal Protection of Artificial Intellegence in Misusage of Deepfake Technology in the Perspective of PDP Law and GDPR] Jeremiah Maximillian Laza; Rizky Karo Karo
Lex Prospicit Vol 1, No 2: July 2023
Publisher : Universitas Pelita Harapan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lp.v1i2.7386

Abstract

Deepfake is a hyper-realistic video that applies AI to depict a person saying and doing things that never happened using face-swapping that leaves little trace of evidence that the video was manipulated. Deepfake is a product of AI that combines, stitches, replaces and superimposes images and video clips to make a fake video look like it's real, and the video is said by the person when in reality the person whose face is replaced in the video never said or acted that way. The legal issue that arises from Deepfake is misinformation, disinformation and fraud, so there needs to be a law governing Deepfake, where in the European Union, regulations related to Deepfake are indirectly contained in the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), and in Indonesia itself there is Law Number 27 of 2022 concerning Personal Data Protection (PDP Law). The formulation of the problem to be studied is how the legal protection of AI Deepfake in terms of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Law Number 27 of 2022 concerning Personal Data Protection. The research method used here is normative, where positive law in Indonesia and in the European Union will be used to analyze. In conclusion, Deepfake is not specifically regulated in either the PDP Law or GDPR, but because AI uses data to develop, the PDP Law and GDPR can still be relevant and can regulate to a certain degree regarding AI.Bahasa Indonesia Abstrak: Deepfake merupakan video hiper-realistis yang menerapkan AI untuk menggambarkan seseorang mengatakan dan melakukan hal-hal yang tidak pernah terjadi. Misalnya dengan membuat pertukaran wajah yang meninggalkan sedikit jejak bukti ada manipulasi terhadap video tersebut. Deepfake merupakan suatu produk AI yang menggabungkan, mempersatukan, mengganti dan menempatkan gambar maupun klip video palsu tampak seperti video itu asli, dan video tersebut seolah-olah beisi perkataan atau berbuatan orang yang wajahnya muncul dalam video. Namun, kenyataan yang berbicara adalah orang pengganti yang wajahnya tidak muncul dalam video tersebut. Isu hukum yang muncul dari deepfake adalah tidak ada pengaturan hukum yang berisi rumusan kaidah yang mengatur larangan melakukan deepfake sebagai misinformasi, disinformasi serta penipuan. Oleh sebab itu penulis melakukan penelitian untuk menemukan peraturan dalam undang-undang yang ada rumusan yang dapat dipergunakan untuk meminta pertanggungjawaban hukum dari pelaku deepfake. Penulis berpendapat bahwa pengaturan deepfake secara tidak langsung tertuang pada General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), dan di Indonesia sendiri ada Undang-Undang Nomor 27 Tahun 2022 tentang Perlindungan Data Pribadi (UU PDP). Oleh karenanya, masalah yang diangkat dalam penelitian ini adalah bagaimana penggunaan pengaturan deepfake dalam General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) dan bagaimana UU PDP Indonesia meminta pertanggungjawaban hukum dari pelaku deepfake sebagai tindak pidana penipuan atau membuat berita bohong. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian hukum normatif. Dikumpulkan dan dibahas aturan hukum positif di Indonesia dan Uni Eropa sebagai sumber bahan hukum primer, serta kepustakaan yang terkait sebagai sumber bahan hukum sekunder. Ditemukan bahwa karena deepfake itu adalah AI yang menggunakan data atau informasi elektronik, maka UU PDP dan GDPR relevan digunakan untuk dipelajari pengaturan tentang larangan manipulasi AI untuk misinformasi, disinformasi atau penipuan serta pembuatan berita bohong di cyberworld.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 10

 1 

Filter by Year

2023 2023


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 1, No 2: July 2023 Vol 1, No 1: February 2023