cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Vira Dwi Agustin
Contact Email
garuda@apji.org
Phone
+6285700037105
Journal Mail Official
info@appihi.or.id
Editorial Address
Perum Cluster G11 Nomor 17 Jl. Plamongan Indah, Pedurungan, Kota Semarang 50195, Semarang, Provinsi Jawa Tengah, 50195
Location
Kota semarang,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia
Published by Asosiasi Peneliti Dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia
ISSN : 30325862     EISSN : 30325854     DOI : 10.62383
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jurnal Ilmu pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia in particular include the study of Communication, Politics, Government, International Relations, and Social Affairs.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Ilmu Politik dan Hubungan Internasional
Articles 3 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): Oktober: Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia" : 3 Documents clear
Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Penyedia Jasa Platform Digital terhadap Pelanggaran Kekayaan Intelektual
Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): Oktober: Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/amandemen.v1i4.472

Abstract

This research discusses Tokopedia's legal responsibility for each consumer if there is a mismatch between goods in online buying and selling. Even though regulations have been formed regarding the technical implementation of electronic commerce, in fact these regulations still have weaknesses in terms of legal protection because parties in electronic transactions, both sellers and buyers, are often disadvantaged by parties who violate agreements and dispute resolution provided through digital platforms is considered still detrimental to one party. The development of digital platforms has opened the door to economic and creative activities. However, this success also carries the risk of intellectual property infringement. This research will explain the background, provide the legal context, and detail the urgency of this research in the legal context in Indonesia.This research uses empirical research methods, and the approach used is a statutory approach (law) Case approach (Case) which is carried out at the level of horizontal synchronization, which measures the extent of a governing law and case.
Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 300K/PDT/2010 dan Keterkaitannya dengan Konsepsi Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation (SLAPP) dalam Perspektif Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen Adrasitta Khaliddya Fithrianni; Aam Suryamah; Agus Suwandono
Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): Oktober: Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/amandemen.v1i4.479

Abstract

The Prita Mulyasari case in 2008 highlighted the challenges of protecting consumers from strategic lawsuit against public participation (SLAPP) suits. SLAPPs aim to stop and prevent individuals or non-governmental organisations from exercising their right to voice their opinions publicly. However, specific regulations addressing SLAPP in the realm of consumer protection in Indonesia are still lacking. The Prita Mulyasari case underscores the need for further attention to establish clear and specific rules to protect consumers from SLAPP practices. This research will further examine how the Supreme Court Decision No. 300K/PDT/2010 in the Prita Mulyasari case can serve as a benchmark in upholding consumer rights within the Indonesian legal framework, especially given the absence of a legal umbrella that protects consumers from lawsuits aimed at limiting public participation in the form of SLAPPs by businesses. This research will employ a normative juridical approach, focusing on primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The study will analyze data gathered from literature reviews using a qualitative normative data analysis method. The research findings indicate that although the Supreme Court granted Prita Mulyasari’s appeal, the legal reasoning in Decision No. 300K/PDT/2010 did not explicitly address the concept of SLAPP. The Supreme Court’s considerations largely focused on the fulfilment of the elements of tort under Article 1365 of the Civil Code. However, the Supreme Court’s use of Article 28F of the 1945 Constitution to justify Prita Mulyasari's conduct is a crucial step in strengthening the legal position of those who express criticism or complaints, as well as their status as consumers.
Implementasi Pasal 54 Undang-Undang No 35 Tahun 2014 Pada Anak Yang Menjadi Korban Bullying di Kota Surakarta Wida Nur Hanita; Aris Prio Agus Santoso; Kresna Agung Yudhianto
Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): Oktober: Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/amandemen.v1i4.480

Abstract

Article 54 of Law No. 35/2014 on Child Protection, an amendment to Law No. 23/2002, states that children in the educational environment must be protected from physical and psychological violence, sexual crimes, and other crimes that may be committed by educators, education personnel, fellow students, or other parties. However, despite this regulation, cases of bullying in schools still occur frequently. This study aims to evaluate the application of Article 54 of Law No. 35 of 2014 concerning Child Protection and legal protection efforts for children who are victims of bullying with a legal certainty approach. The research method used is descriptive with qualitative data analysis. The results showed that Article 54 has been well implemented by the Surakarta City Office of Women's Empowerment and Child Protection and Population Control and Family Planning. They conduct socialization in schools and communities as a preventive measure and assist the mediation process for case resolution as a repressive measure. In addition, for the legal protection of child victims of bullying with a legal certainty approach, the Office also integrates bullying prevention and handling programs, facilitates and fosters education units, and provides educational facilities.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 3

 1 

Filter by Year

2024 2024


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): Oktober: Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): Juli: Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): April : Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): Januari : Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia