cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota medan,
Sumatera utara
INDONESIA
PREMISE LAW JURNAL
Published by Universitas Sumatera Utara
ISSN : -     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 7 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 10 (2015)" : 7 Documents clear
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM KEPADA PEMBELI YANG BERITIKAD BAIK DALAM HAL DILAKUKANNYA PENCATATAN BLOKIR DAN SITA PADA SERTIPIKAT HAK ATAS TANAH OLEH KANTOR PERTANAHAN KOTA MEDAN CAHRYA HALOHO
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 10 (2015)
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (283.281 KB)

Abstract

Land registration, required by the government and in line with Article 19 of UUPA, is aimed to guarantee legal certainty on land rights by the issuance of land rights certificates. The legal problems arises when the action of suspension and confiscation registration done by an applicant is not correct because at the time of the registration the certificate is not in the name of the real owner, or the certificate has been transferred to another party (good faith buyer). The result of the research showed that the registration procedure of suspension and confiscation on land rights certificates at the Land Office had to fulfill the requirement of suspension and confiscation stipulated by the Regulation of the Head of BPN (National Land Board) No. 1/2010 on Service Standard and Regulation on Land. Some factors which cause the case of the registration of suspension and confiscation are legal provisions which implies that there is no fixed regulation about legal protection for good faith buyers, and law enforcements that are directly related to the process of legal enforcement are District Court and the National Land Board of the Land Office which plays an important role in conducting the registration of suspension and confiscation. In this case, the judge who stipulates the Verdict of Foreclosure ignores the legal protection for good faith buyers and the Land Office pays attention only to their own interest or to parties concerned in carrying out the registration of suspension and confiscation. Keywords:   Legal Protection, Good Faith Buyers, Suspension and Confiscation Certificate
ANALISIS HUKUM WAKAF ATAS PEMBANGUNAN MASJID DI ATAS HAK GUNA USAHA PTPN IV KEBUN PABATU KABUPATEN SERDANG BEDAGAI N U R M A U L I N U R M A U L I
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 10 (2015)
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (366.842 KB)

Abstract

The leasehold which can be used for wakaf is as follows. The leasehold owned by corporation is not peformed by the corporation itself such as the State-owned company, PTPN IV. The company has several estates and one of them is Unit Kebun Pabatu at Pabatu, Serdang Bedagai Disrict. Each afdeling (unit) of PTPN IV, including Unit Kebun Pabatu, has a mosque. The mosque is on the leaseholld of PTPN IV, whereas according to Law No. 41/2004 on Wakaf, its implementing regulation, the Government Regulation No. 42/2006, and Book III of the Presidential Decree No. 1/1991 on the Compilation of the Islamic Law, the mosque in the leasehold of PTPN  IV Unit Kebun Pabatu should and can be used as a wakaf object. It means that the land, where the mosque is located, should be taken out from the leasehold of PTPN IV Unit Kebun Pabatu. Keywords: Wakaf on Leasehold Land
TINJAUAN YURIDIS ATAS TINDAKAN DEBITUR YANG MENOLAK PENGOSONGAN BARANG JAMINAN YANG DIEKSEKUSI OLEH BANK YOICE IRENE LAMTIUR P
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 10 (2015)
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (208.93 KB)

Abstract

In a banking credit, the bank as creditor usually do the collateral binding in which in this research is a commitment right to save the credit distribution according to UUHT No. 4 of 1996. If debtor  is in default, the creditor has a right on execution of the quarantee object based on the applied rule. This research is a normative low study in descriptive analytic design. Based on the result of research it indicates that the procedure of execution of quarantee object  is if the debtor is in default in payment the debt that indicated by the warning letter by creditor for 3 times and somation of the legal representative of creditor for 3 times. The implementation of the execution of the guarantee object  gain the opposed of debtir so the creditor to the enforcement  by flat execution from the district court of Batam by ask the bailiff of the court of Batam and the police of Batam. The creditor before the execution must do the negotiation to the creditor to avoid the resistance in the execution of the object
TINJAUAN YURIDIS KUASA MUTLAK DALAM PEMBUATAN AKTA NOTARIS MENURUT PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN DI INDONESIA EMA EMELIA
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 10 (2015)
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (138.3 KB)

Abstract

Based on the Instruction of the Internal Affairs Minister No. 14/1982 on the Prohibition to use Irrevocable Power of Attorney as the Transfer on Land Rights on March 6, 1982, there was a prohibited Power of Attorney in which it contained the element which could not be withdrawn by the principal since it is the transfer of land rights. In its development, the Instruction of the Internal Affairs Minister was changed: the Decree of the Agrarian Director General, on behalf of the Internal Affairs Minister No. 594/1492/AGR regulates the use irrevocable power of attorney, not as prohibited irrevocable power attorney as stipulated in sales certificate, sales agreement, and APHT. ). Deviation in irrevocable power of attorney occurred after being revised on March 30, 1982; if it was not revised or rectified, the land would returned to the heir when the seller died, and it would be chaos because the buyer was harmed financially. Therefore, the Circular Letter of the Directorate of Agrarian Affairs No. 594/1492/AGR on March 30, 1982 has been amended by the Government. The legal domicile of the parties concerned in the irrevocable power of attorney can actually be implemented provided that it is united with purchase agreement. Every buy and sell with irrevocable power of attorney is approved by the Supreme Court, and purchase agreement still exists. Keywords: Irrevocable Power of Attorney, Drawing up Deed, Notary/PPAT
PELAKSANAAN AKAD PEMBIAYAAN MURABAHAHAL-WAKALAH PADA PEMBIAYAAN WARUNG MIKRO DIPT. BANK SYARIAH MANDIRI CABANG MEDAN DESY WULANDARI WIJAYA
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 10 (2015)
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (257.958 KB)

Abstract

One of the financing products in Syariah Banking is Murabahah Al-Wakalah financing found in the Fatwa of National Syariah Council No.04/DSN-MUI/IV/2000 on Murabahah and No.10/DSN-MUI/IV/2000 on Al-Wakalah. This Murabahah Al-Wakalah agreement is applied at Bank Syariah Mandiri, Medan Branch in implementing the micro financing distributed to the community members. The result of this study showed that the agreement of Murabahah Al-Wakalah was the one used for the financing product of micro-shop at Bank Syariah Mandiri.  Micro-shop is the financing given by Bank Syariah Mandiri to the prospective customers either individual or business entity to finance the  need of their business through working capital financing, investment financing, people’s business financing, early basic,intermediate and major financing. In which, the financing used the agreement of Murabahah Al-Wakalah as their payment agreement contract. Keywords : Murabahah Agreement, Al-Wakalah Agreement, Bank Syariah Mandiri Medan Branch
ANALISIS HUKUM TERHADAP PERMOHONAN PAILIT ATAS DEVELOPER DALAM PERJANJIAN PENGIKATAN JUAL BELI APARTEMEN ( STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NO. 331 K/PDT. SUS/2012 TANGGAL 12 JUNI 2012) KARTINI MEILINA H.
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 10 (2015)
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (357.524 KB)

Abstract

PT Graha Permata Properindo as Developer promised that it will finish the construction work  and physically deliver the apartment in December 2008, but at the time agreed, as Developer, PT. Graha Permata Properindo could not deliver the apartment units to the buyer. The consumers may file the bankruptcy petition against the developer to the Commercial Court because they also act as the creditor for the developer. PT. Bank Tabungan Negara (Persero) Tbk participated in filing an appeal to the Supreme Court against the Decision of Bankruptcy issued by the Commercial Court against the developer because, PT. Bank Tabungan Negara (Persero) Tbk is the creditor for the developer and the developer is still solvent that bankruptcy can inflict loss to the bank as creditor. The legal analysis on the bankruptcy petition against the developer is that elements of credit have been met in the case of bankruptcy petition against the developer. Keywords : Developer, Apartment Trading Agreement, Bankruptcy Petition
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PIHAK YANG BERHAK ATAS TANAH DALAM HAL GANTI RUGI BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 2 TAHUN 2012 TENTANG PENGADAAN TANAH BAGI PEMBANGUNAN UNTUK KEPENTINGAN UMUM MEILYA NORMAWATY SIMANJUNTAK
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 10 (2015)
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (268.287 KB)

Abstract

Land acquisition for constructing public facility arouses problem in its practice, in which dispute in land acquisition by the government is increasing. Coercion from various parties such as the government that set the compensation uniterally, the land real owner who asks for unreasonable price, and the existence of consignment institution or the bailment of the compensation in the District Court when the real land owner does not agree on the amount of the compensation will bring about the right and the interest of the real land owner does get legal protection. The problems of the research were as follows: how to avoid conflict in implementing land acquisition for public facility, how about the existence of consignment institution in land acquisition for public acquisition, and how about legal protection for the real land owner, based on Law No. 12/2012 on Land acquisition for public facility. The result of the research showed that, in order to avoid conflict in land acquisition for public facility was by putting forward the principle and the provision of materials in land acquisition and transparency in the procedures of land acquisition, and appropriate and righteous compensation for the real land owner. The consignment which was caused by the disagreement on compensation could not be done because it was government arbitrary action toward the people. Legal protection for the real land owner, especially the compensation, should be based on the principle of justice and feasibility by considering the guarantee for compensation both physically and non-physically so that the consignment which was caused by the disagreement was automatically not needed anymore.   Keywords: Land Acquisition, Public Facility, Consignment, Land Compensation

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 7

 1 

Filter by Year

2015 2015


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 18 (2019): VOLUME 18 TAHUN 2019 Vol 17 (2019): VOLUME 17 TAHUN 2019 Vol 16 (2019): VOLUME 16 TAHUN 2019 Vol 15 (2019): VOLUME 15 TAHUN 2019 Vol 14 (2019): VOLUME 14 TAHUN 2019 Vol 13 (2019): VOLUME 13 TAHUN 2019 Vol 12 (2019): VOLUME 12 TAHUN 2019 Vol 11 (2019): VOLUME 11 TAHUN 2019 Vol 10 (2019): VOLUME 10 TAHUN 2019 Vol 9 (2019): VOLUME 9 TAHUN 2019 Vol 8 (2019): VOLUME 8 TAHUN 2019 Vol 7 (2019): VOLUME 7 TAHUN 2019 Vol 6 (2019): VOLUME 6 TAHUN 2019 Vol 5 (2019): VOLUME 5 TAHUN 2019 Vol 4 (2019): VOLUME 4 TAHUN 2019 Vol 3 (2019): VOLUME 3 TAHUN 2019 Vol 2 (2019): VOLUME 2 TAHUN 2019 Vol 1 (2019): VOLUME 1 TAHUN 2019 Vol 17 (2018): VOLUME 17 TAHUN 2018 Vol 16 (2018): VOLUME 16 TAHUN 2018 Vol 15 (2018): VOLUME 15 TAHUN 2018 Vol 14 (2018): VOLUME 14 TAHUN 2018 Vol 13 (2018): VOLUME 13 TAHUN 2018 Vol 12 (2018): VOLUME 12 TAHUN 2018 Vol 11 (2018): VOLUME 11 TAHUN 2018 Vol 10 (2018): VOLUME 10 TAHUN 2018 Vol 9 (2018): VOLUME 9 TAHUN 2018 Vol 8 (2018): VOLUME 8 TAHUN 2018 Vol 7 (2018): VOLUME 7 TAHUN 2018 Vol 6 (2018): VOLUME 6 TAHUN 2018 Vol 5 (2018): VOLUME 5 TAHUN 2018 Vol 4 (2018): VOLUME 4 TAHUN 2018 Vol 3 (2018): VOLUME 3 TAHUN 2018 Vol 2 (2018): VOLUME 2 TAHUN 2018 Vol 1 (2018): VOLUME 1 TAHUN 2018 Vol 24 (2017): VOLUME 24 TAHUN 2017 Vol 23 (2017): VOLUME 23 TAHUN 2017 Vol 22 (2017): VOLUME 22 TAHUN 2017 Vol 21 (2017): VOLUME 21 TAHUN 2017 Vol 20 (2017): VOLUME 20 TAHUN 2017 Vol 19 (2017): VOLUME 19 TAHUN 2017 Vol 18 (2017): VOLUME 18 TAHUN 2017 Vol 17 (2017): VOLUME 17 TAHUN 2017 Vol 16 (2017): VOLUME 16 TAHUN 2017 Vol 15 (2017): VOLUME 15 TAHUN 2017 Vol 14 (2017): VOLUME XIV TAHUN 2017 Vol 13 (2017): Volume XIII Tahun 2017 Vol 12 (2017): VOLUME XII TAHUN 2017 Vol 11 (2017): Volume XI Tahun 2017 Vol 10 (2017): VOLUME X TAHUN 2017 Vol 9 (2017): vol IX Tahun 2017 Vol 8 (2017): Volume VIII Tahun 2017 Vol 7 (2017): Volume VII Tahun 2017 Vol 6 (2017): VOLUME VI TAHUN 2017 Vol 5 (2017): VOLUME V TAHUN 2017 Vol 4 (2017): VOLUME IV TAHUN 2017 Vol 3 (2017): VOLUME III TAHUN 2017 Vol 2 (2017): VOLUME II TAHUN 2017 Vol 1 (2017): VOLUME I TAHUN 2017 Vol 21 (2016): VOLUME XXI TAHUN 2016 Vol 20 (2016): VOLUME XX TAHUN 2016 Vol 19 (2016): VOLUME XIX TAHUN 2016 Vol 18 (2016): VOLUME XVIII TAHUN 2016 Vol 17 (2016): VOLUME XVII TAHUN 2016 Vol 16 (2016): VOLUME XVI TAHUN 2016 Vol 15 (2016): VOLUME XV TAHUN 2016 Vol 14 (2016): VOLUME XIV TAHUN 2016 Vol 13 (2016): VOLUME XIII TAHUN 2016 Vol 12 (2016): VOLUME XII TAHUN 2016 Vol 11 (2016): VOLUME XI TAHUN 2016 Vol 10 (2016): VOLUME X TAHUN 2016 Vol 9 (2016): VOLUME IX TAHUN 2016 Vol 8 (2016): VOLUME VIII TAHUN 2016 Vol 7 (2016): VOLUME VII TAHUN 2016 Vol 6 (2016): VOLUME VI TAHUN 2016 Vol 5 (2016): Volume V Tahun 2016 Vol 4 (2016): Volume IV Tahun 2016 Vol 3 (2016): Volume III Tahun 2016 Vol 2 (2016): Volume II Tahun 2016 Vol 1 (2016): Volume I Tahun 2016 Vol 14 (2015): Volume XIV Tahun 2015 Vol 13 (2015): Volume XIII Tahun 2015 Vol 12 (2015): Volume XII Tahun 2015 Vol 11 (2015): Volume XI Tahun 2015 Vol 9 (2015): Volume IX Tahun 2015 Vol 8 (2015): Volume VIII Tahun 2015 Vol 7 (2015): Volume VII Tahun 2015 Vol 6 (2015): Volume VI Tahun 2015 Vol 5 (2015): Volume V Tahun 2015 Vol 4 (2015): Volume IV Tahun 2015 Vol 3 (2015): Volume III Tahun 2015 Vol 2 (2015): Volume II Tahun 2015 Vol 1 (2015): Volume I Tahun 2015 Vol 10 (2015) Vol 4: Volume 4 (2014) : Volume IV Tahun 2014 Vol 3 (2014): Volume III Tahun 2014 Vol 2 (2014) Vol 1: Volume I Tahun 2014 Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Volume II Tahun 2013 Vol 3: Volume III tahun 2013 Vol 1 (2013) More Issue