cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota medan,
Sumatera utara
INDONESIA
PREMISE LAW JURNAL
Published by Universitas Sumatera Utara
ISSN : -     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 9 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 17 (2016): VOLUME XVII TAHUN 2016" : 9 Documents clear
ANALISIS YURIDIS PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN KREDITUR DALAM MASA PENGAWASAN SEBELUM DILELANG MENGALAMI KEHILANGAN SEBAGIAN PROPERTI BARANG JAMINAN (STUDI PADA PT. BANK SUMUT CABANG PEMBANTU MELATI) HABIBAH NASUTION
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 17 (2016): VOLUME XVII TAHUN 2016
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (282.319 KB)

Abstract

Credit settlement sometimes encounters problems, namely failure in credit payment. In the practice, a creditor requests some collateral for his security in the credit payment. In the practice of the object analyzed in this research, the status of the debtor’s credit is a bad credit. The creditor secured the collateral by means of supervision by planting a signboard on the collateral. However, some of the properties often miss before being auctioned; the collateral  was an empty house under the supervision. The debtor filed an objection to the creditor for any compensation, but the creditor refused with an excuse that the missing of some of the properties was not his/her responsibility. Keywords        :           Creditor, Debtor, supervision, Collateral
ANALISIS HUKUM TERHADAP PEMBATALAN AKTA PERDAMAIAN SECARA SEPIHAK (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN PERKARA PERDATA NO: 605/Pdt.G/2013/PN.Mdn) IRVEB IMANUEL TARIGAN
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 17 (2016): VOLUME XVII TAHUN 2016
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (203.393 KB)

Abstract

The unilateral annulment made before a Notary was actually unnecessary to be made again because the Court Ruling has contained the legal force to annul the deed. The Notary is not authorized to make an annulment deed of reconciliation as stipulated in Article 1338 paragraph (2). The legal consequences produced after the Ruling No.605/Pdt.G/2013/PN.Mdn were that the Agreement Deed No.08 dated February 21, 2012 and Reconciliation Agreement Deed No.09 dated February 21, 2012 were annulled By The Law. Based on the conclusion, it is suggested that the parties involved in the making of the deed of reconciliation agreement be assisted by a mediator. It is also suggested that all parties who make the agreement of reconciliation concur and comply with the requirements mentioned by the law, in this case the Article 1320 of the Civil Code. It is recommended that the Notary be more conscientious in making the Deed of Reconciliation and pay more attention to the provisions and regulations in the prevailing Law, so that any kind of potential conflict can be prevented in the future.   Keywords: Reconciliation Deed Annulment, Unilaterally, Ruling
ANALISIS HUKUM ATAS KEKUATAN HUKUM GRANT SULTAN TERHADAP ADANYA PENERBITAN SERTIPIKAT OLEH PIHAK LAIN DILOKASI YANG SAMA JOHN QADRI HANAFIAH
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 17 (2016): VOLUME XVII TAHUN 2016
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (347.545 KB)

Abstract

The regulation on the position of rights in grant Sultan states that it is the Indonesian rights and is subject to the adat law. Grant Sultan in the Melayu kingdom was under the authority of Sultan. Therefore, grant Sultan which is issued for dependency was signed and stamped the Sultan of Melayu kingdom. The proving procedure of the grants before UUPA was in effective in the portions of land settled by the Melayunese under the four oeroengs was that they were issued, signed, and sealed by the head of oeroeng and then signed and sealerd them. After UUPA was in effective, the proving procedure was that the mechanism of its implementation was by direct conversion. The issuance of certificate in the grant has met the procedure of land registration according to PP (Government Regulation) No. 24/1997 which is done systematically. The Judge’s Verdict No. 96/Pdt/2012/PN-Mdn on the case of grant Sultan is legal because it is in accordance with article 32, paragraph 2 of PP No. 24/1997 on Land Registration. Keywords: Legal Protection, Grant Sultan, Certificate
ANALISIS HUKUM TENTANG PENDAFTARAN TANAH ULAYAT YANG MENJADI HAK PERORANGAN PADA TANAH ULAYAT DI KABUPATEN DAIRI LAMHOT HERIANTO SIGIRO
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 17 (2016): VOLUME XVII TAHUN 2016
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (306.028 KB)

Abstract

As an adat community, the majority of people in Parbuluan Subdistrict comply with Batak adat law. Each plot of land in Batak community is controlled by certain marga (clan) as the owner of village adat land. Since law No. 5/1960 on Basic Agrarian Regulations is in effect, land registrations becomes the most important thing in the land system in Indonesia because it is the beginning of the process of the bird of land rights ownership. The adat law community in Parbuluan Subdistrict who wants to register their land has to request for Raja Huta/Kepala Huta (village head) by submitting an amount of money which is called “Tulak Sakkul” as a token that the marga land rights has been released and is allowed to be registered for getting its certificate. “Tulak Sakkul” is submitted in an adat ceremony by having meal together as a proof that the village land owner, represented by the village head, has submitted his rights on the marga land. Keywords: Land registration, Marga Land, Parbuluan Subdistrict
KEDUDUKAN HUKUM ATAS HARTA YANG DIHIBAHKAN PADA PERKAWINAN YANG BELUM DICATATKAN TANPA PERSETUJUAN ISTRI (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Nomor 425/PDT.G/2012/PN.Mdn tanggal 05 November 2012) MARIA SIANTURI
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 17 (2016): VOLUME XVII TAHUN 2016
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (285.906 KB)

Abstract

A marriage in Indonesia is regulated in Law No. 1/1974 on Marriage. Article 2, paragraph 1 of Marriage Law states that a marriage is legitimate when it is performed according to each religion and belief; paragraph 2 states that each marriage is to be registered according to the prevailing regulations. Based on this Article, the legitimacy of a marriage is interpreted differently in the verdict of the District Court No. 425/Pdt.G/2012/PN.Mdn on November 5, 2012 which states that a marriage is legitimate when it is performed according to religion and belief while registration is only administrative action. The research used descriptive analytic and judicial normative method. The marriage registration can prove that there is a marriage which is recognized by State. An unregistered marriage does not cause legal consequence for husband and wife, children and joint property. Joint property which is registered is considered as dowry brought to a marriage by either side. Hibah (grant) given by a husband on unregistered joint property does not need his wife’s approval. Therefore, active role in registering a marriage is needed to get legal certainty on a wife’s right and property. Keywords : Marriage Legitimacy, Marriage Registration, Legal Consequence of   Unregistered Marriage
ANALISIS YURIDIS PENGESAHAN PERKAWINAN BEDA AGAMA DAN AKIBAT HUKUMNYA (STUDI PENETAPAN NO. 156/PDT.P/2010/PN.SKA TENTANG PERKAWINAN BEDA AGAMA) YUDI PRANATA
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 17 (2016): VOLUME XVII TAHUN 2016
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (213.41 KB)

Abstract

A marriage is very important and sacred because it is a profound wedlock between a husband-to-be and a wife-to-be who want to establish a family and a household by committing a marriage. The problems of the research were as follows: how about the regulation on prohibiting a mixed marriage according to the Marriage Law in Indonesia, how about the legal consequence of a mixed marriage according to the Marriage Law in Indonesia, and how about the consideration of the panel of judges in the Ruling No. 156/Pdt./2010/PN.Ska on the Request for a Mixed Marriage. The research uses descriptive and judicial normative method.  The regulation on the prohibition of a mixed marriage in Indonesia is clearly regulated; but, in reality, is still ineffective because there is different perspective in interpreting the Article on the prohibition of a mixed marriage. The legal consequence of a mixed marriage is in Article 2 of Law No. 1/1974 on Marriage. The consideration of the Panel of Judges in the Ruling No. 156/Pdt./2010/PN.Ska on the Request for a Mixed Marriage places the emphasis on Article 57 of Law No 1/1974 on Marriage which regulates a Mixed Marriage. Keywords: Marriage, Prohibition of Marriage, Different Religions
ANALISIS YURIDIS SENGKETA HARTA MILIK PRIBADI YANG DIPUTUSKAN OLEH PENGADILAN MENJADI HARTA BERSAMA (STUDI PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI MEDAN NOMOR 290/Pdt.G/2013/PN.Mdn FITRI YANTI TAMBUN
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 17 (2016): VOLUME XVII TAHUN 2016
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (367.722 KB)

Abstract

The Law on Marriage Property regulates the legal consequences on the husband and wife’s property. The arrangement of marriage property can be seen from how they obtain the property. The object of the research was the Verdict of Medan District Court No.290/Pdt.G/2013/PN regarding the settlement of the personal property that has been made joint property. The problem discussed in the analysis of this research was: how to classify the property that was received after the marriage has been dissolved and how about the legal consequences toward the inheritance that was not distributed yet, how the trade between mother and son/daughter is in accordance with positive law in Indonesia, and how the judge’s legal considerations were in the Verdict of Medan District Court No.290/Pdt.G/2013/PN.Mdn. the research used descriptive analytical and judicial normative method. Keywords: Marriage Property, Personal Property, Dissolved Marriage
PEMBATALAN PERJANJIAN BAKU YANG MELANGGAR UNDANG-UNDANG STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 368 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2013 IMMANUEL SIHITE
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 17 (2016): VOLUME XVII TAHUN 2016
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (376.203 KB)

Abstract

Standard contract is a binding agreement of the stakeholders who sign it. Any loss which occurs later will be their responsibility, based on the clause of the contract, unless the clause is forbidden according to Article 18 of Law No 8/1999 on Consumer Protection. The analysis of the research is the Supreme Court’s Ruling No. 368/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2013 in examining a special civil case on complaint about the Decision of Consumer Dispute Settlement Body in the cassation appeal between PT Express Limon Nusantara as business person and Dedek Cahyo as consumer. The research used theory of legal certainty with judicial normative and descriptive analytic methods. The ruling should have the sense of justice for those who should get legal protection so that legal certainty and justice in handing down a ruling so that there will balance in the ruling. A judge has to be fair in his ruling and give sanction upon consumers who have breached a contract. Keywords: Standard Contract, Business Person, Consumer
KEKUATAN HUKUM PEMBUKTIAN PERALIHAN HAK GANTI RUGI (PHGR) NOTARIS SEBAGAI SYARAT UNTUK PENDAFTARAN HAKNYA ITA RISNAWATY PURBA
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 17 (2016): VOLUME XVII TAHUN 2016
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (271.756 KB)

Abstract

In conclusion, Notary’s PHGR Deed also has proving legal force as the ground of the right when the title is to be registered for receiving the land ownership right and also having legal force to prove as evidence in court of justice. This is proven in a decision of the rulling of district court No.76/Pdt//2014/PT-Mdn dated April 16,  which has won PHGR deed as the land owner. This showing that even the right of land certificate is a letter evidence of right that happened as a strong and perfect, but if physical date and or judicial date on it has wrong, so will be a weak evidence. In this case the officer which is issued proof of the right do not pay attention to the principle of accuracy to the ground object, in the issueance of the certificate. The principle of the negative publicity that is practiced in our country open opportunities to do the rebuttal although the land who has registered his rights in the national land agency. So with the notarial deed which is the authentic deed that has been set by law. There is a good Notaries still act professional, by using the principle of awareness with first make sure that the PHGR deed have legal certainty before making it. Notary PHGR deed has the strength of evidence and can be used as the pedestal of the right to be registered to the National Land Agency. Keywords: Notarial PHGR Deed, Right Transfer

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 9

 1 

Filter by Year

2016 2016


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 18 (2019): VOLUME 18 TAHUN 2019 Vol 17 (2019): VOLUME 17 TAHUN 2019 Vol 16 (2019): VOLUME 16 TAHUN 2019 Vol 15 (2019): VOLUME 15 TAHUN 2019 Vol 14 (2019): VOLUME 14 TAHUN 2019 Vol 13 (2019): VOLUME 13 TAHUN 2019 Vol 12 (2019): VOLUME 12 TAHUN 2019 Vol 11 (2019): VOLUME 11 TAHUN 2019 Vol 10 (2019): VOLUME 10 TAHUN 2019 Vol 9 (2019): VOLUME 9 TAHUN 2019 Vol 8 (2019): VOLUME 8 TAHUN 2019 Vol 7 (2019): VOLUME 7 TAHUN 2019 Vol 6 (2019): VOLUME 6 TAHUN 2019 Vol 5 (2019): VOLUME 5 TAHUN 2019 Vol 4 (2019): VOLUME 4 TAHUN 2019 Vol 3 (2019): VOLUME 3 TAHUN 2019 Vol 2 (2019): VOLUME 2 TAHUN 2019 Vol 1 (2019): VOLUME 1 TAHUN 2019 Vol 17 (2018): VOLUME 17 TAHUN 2018 Vol 16 (2018): VOLUME 16 TAHUN 2018 Vol 15 (2018): VOLUME 15 TAHUN 2018 Vol 14 (2018): VOLUME 14 TAHUN 2018 Vol 13 (2018): VOLUME 13 TAHUN 2018 Vol 12 (2018): VOLUME 12 TAHUN 2018 Vol 11 (2018): VOLUME 11 TAHUN 2018 Vol 10 (2018): VOLUME 10 TAHUN 2018 Vol 9 (2018): VOLUME 9 TAHUN 2018 Vol 8 (2018): VOLUME 8 TAHUN 2018 Vol 7 (2018): VOLUME 7 TAHUN 2018 Vol 6 (2018): VOLUME 6 TAHUN 2018 Vol 5 (2018): VOLUME 5 TAHUN 2018 Vol 4 (2018): VOLUME 4 TAHUN 2018 Vol 3 (2018): VOLUME 3 TAHUN 2018 Vol 2 (2018): VOLUME 2 TAHUN 2018 Vol 1 (2018): VOLUME 1 TAHUN 2018 Vol 24 (2017): VOLUME 24 TAHUN 2017 Vol 23 (2017): VOLUME 23 TAHUN 2017 Vol 22 (2017): VOLUME 22 TAHUN 2017 Vol 21 (2017): VOLUME 21 TAHUN 2017 Vol 20 (2017): VOLUME 20 TAHUN 2017 Vol 19 (2017): VOLUME 19 TAHUN 2017 Vol 18 (2017): VOLUME 18 TAHUN 2017 Vol 17 (2017): VOLUME 17 TAHUN 2017 Vol 16 (2017): VOLUME 16 TAHUN 2017 Vol 15 (2017): VOLUME 15 TAHUN 2017 Vol 14 (2017): VOLUME XIV TAHUN 2017 Vol 13 (2017): Volume XIII Tahun 2017 Vol 12 (2017): VOLUME XII TAHUN 2017 Vol 11 (2017): Volume XI Tahun 2017 Vol 10 (2017): VOLUME X TAHUN 2017 Vol 9 (2017): vol IX Tahun 2017 Vol 8 (2017): Volume VIII Tahun 2017 Vol 7 (2017): Volume VII Tahun 2017 Vol 6 (2017): VOLUME VI TAHUN 2017 Vol 5 (2017): VOLUME V TAHUN 2017 Vol 4 (2017): VOLUME IV TAHUN 2017 Vol 3 (2017): VOLUME III TAHUN 2017 Vol 2 (2017): VOLUME II TAHUN 2017 Vol 1 (2017): VOLUME I TAHUN 2017 Vol 21 (2016): VOLUME XXI TAHUN 2016 Vol 20 (2016): VOLUME XX TAHUN 2016 Vol 19 (2016): VOLUME XIX TAHUN 2016 Vol 18 (2016): VOLUME XVIII TAHUN 2016 Vol 17 (2016): VOLUME XVII TAHUN 2016 Vol 16 (2016): VOLUME XVI TAHUN 2016 Vol 15 (2016): VOLUME XV TAHUN 2016 Vol 14 (2016): VOLUME XIV TAHUN 2016 Vol 13 (2016): VOLUME XIII TAHUN 2016 Vol 12 (2016): VOLUME XII TAHUN 2016 Vol 11 (2016): VOLUME XI TAHUN 2016 Vol 10 (2016): VOLUME X TAHUN 2016 Vol 9 (2016): VOLUME IX TAHUN 2016 Vol 8 (2016): VOLUME VIII TAHUN 2016 Vol 7 (2016): VOLUME VII TAHUN 2016 Vol 6 (2016): VOLUME VI TAHUN 2016 Vol 5 (2016): Volume V Tahun 2016 Vol 4 (2016): Volume IV Tahun 2016 Vol 3 (2016): Volume III Tahun 2016 Vol 2 (2016): Volume II Tahun 2016 Vol 1 (2016): Volume I Tahun 2016 Vol 14 (2015): Volume XIV Tahun 2015 Vol 13 (2015): Volume XIII Tahun 2015 Vol 12 (2015): Volume XII Tahun 2015 Vol 11 (2015): Volume XI Tahun 2015 Vol 9 (2015): Volume IX Tahun 2015 Vol 8 (2015): Volume VIII Tahun 2015 Vol 7 (2015): Volume VII Tahun 2015 Vol 6 (2015): Volume VI Tahun 2015 Vol 5 (2015): Volume V Tahun 2015 Vol 4 (2015): Volume IV Tahun 2015 Vol 3 (2015): Volume III Tahun 2015 Vol 2 (2015): Volume II Tahun 2015 Vol 1 (2015): Volume I Tahun 2015 Vol 10 (2015) Vol 4: Volume 4 (2014) : Volume IV Tahun 2014 Vol 3 (2014): Volume III Tahun 2014 Vol 2 (2014) Vol 1: Volume I Tahun 2014 Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Volume II Tahun 2013 Vol 3: Volume III tahun 2013 Vol 1 (2013) More Issue