cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota medan,
Sumatera utara
INDONESIA
PREMISE LAW JURNAL
Published by Universitas Sumatera Utara
ISSN : -     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 8 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 22 (2017): VOLUME 22 TAHUN 2017" : 8 Documents clear
PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA TANAH ULAYAT ANTARA MASYARAKAT ADAT SENAMA NENEK DENGAN PTPN V DI KENEGERIAN SENAMA NENEK KECAMATAN TAPUNG HULU KABUPATEN KAMPAR PROVINSI RIAU AL JAMIL FEBRIADI
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 22 (2017): VOLUME 22 TAHUN 2017
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (478.54 KB)

Abstract

Customary Institution of Ninik Mamak (Tribal Leader) is the representative of customary community in One Lineage Community, Tapang Hulu Subditrict, Kampar Regency, Riau Province which is expected to be able to settle the dispute over communal reserved land that has been going since 1996. The administration and responsibility of communal reserved land, in Kampar Regency, Riau Province; is usually taken care of a Customary Institution called Ninik Mamak of its community. Therefore, it is necessary to study the settlement of the dispute over communal reserved land between customary One Lineage community and PTPN V in Customary One Lineage Community at Tapung Hulu Subdistrict, Kampar Regency, Riau Province. The research problems are: How the role of Customary Institution of One Lineage Community is to settle the dispute over communal reserved land between customary One Lineage community and PTPN V; How the dispute over communal reserved land between customary One Lineage community is settled; and how the status of the communal reserved land which was earlier possessed by PTPN V.This is an empirical juridical research with descriptive approach. The data were collected through library study, analyzed qualitatively which describes and analyzes simultaneously the research problem. Deductive-inductive reasoning method is used to draw a conclusion.Keywords: Communal Reserved Land, Settlement, Customary Community
ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP LELANG BARANG JAMINAN YANG HAK TANGGUNGANNYA BELUM TERPASANG (STUDI PADA PT. BANK MANDIRI (PERSERO) TBK) DEVI MUTIA MASTURA
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 22 (2017): VOLUME 22 TAHUN 2017
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (214.772 KB)

Abstract

A credit contract is an agreement between Bank and debtor which binds them in contract. It is closely related to credit guarantee as a part of an agreement between both of them. It can be a plot of land as hypothecation. The result of the research showed that the process of burdening hypothecation at PT. Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk, Medan, was carried out in two stages: a) giving hypothecation done before PPAT (Official Empowered to Draw up Land Deeds) appointed by PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk, Medan, and b) registration of hypothecation carried out in the Land Office. The policy made by PT. Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk, Medan, to settle the problem of collateral with no hypothecation which will be auctioned by registering it, paying off the credit, and selling the collateral. When this effort fails due to debtor’s bad faith, the case will be brought to the Court.Keywords: Hypothecation, Auction, Collateral with No Hypothecation
ITIKAD BAIK PENGUASAAN FISIK SEBAGAI DASAR PEROLEHAN KEPEMILIKAN HAK ATAS TANAH (ANALISIS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 269PK/PDT/2015) EPIPANNI SIHOTANG
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 22 (2017): VOLUME 22 TAHUN 2017
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (405.396 KB)

Abstract

Legal consequence land transact with good faith which is made fraudulent causes the land transfer to be illegal, to have no legal certainty, and to have no legal protection. The Judges’ decision in the Supreme Court’s Ruling No. 269PK/PDT/2015 is not accurate since the plaintiff as the buyer is considered negligent to see who is the real owner of the land and the object of the transact; He is considered having no good faith since he buys it even though he knows that it is occupied, and the plaintiff cannot give evidence of the validity in land transfer consecutively up to the right holder until the registration according to Article 24, paragraph 1. The judges’ consideration in the Supreme Court’s Ruling No. 269PK/PDT/2015 is not accurate because it is not in accordance with legal facts and does give concrete reasons, basic decision, and certain Articles of legal Provisions or unwritten legal source in pronouncing judgment.Keywords: Buyer with Good Faith, Land Right Transfer
PENGANGKATAN ANAK WARGA NEGARA INDONESIA YANG DIADOPSI OLEH WARGA NEGARA ASING (STUDI PENETAPAN PN NOMOR 1028/PDT.P/2007/PN.SBY DAN PENETAPAN PN NOMOR 62/PDT.P/2010/PN.MKD) HARIADI SYAHPUTRA
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 22 (2017): VOLUME 22 TAHUN 2017
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (377.685 KB)

Abstract

Adopting an Indonesian child by foreign citizens has to comply with the regulation in PP No. 54/2007 on the Implementation of Adopting a Child and the Decree of the Minister of Social Affairs No. 110/HUK/2009 on the Requirements for Adopting a Child through the Court’s Verdict. There are two types of legal protection for an Indonesian child adopted by foreign citizens in Indonesia – preventive and repressive. The District Court’s Verdict No. 1028/Pdt.P/2007/PN.Sby is in accordance with the constituents found in the Supreme Court’s Circular Letter No. 6/1983 on the Improvement of SEMA No. 2/1979 on Child Adoption, and the District Court’s Verdict No. 62/Pdt.P/2010/PN.Mkd is also appropriate since it does not meet the constituents in Article 13, letter e in conjunction with Article 16 and Article 14 of PP No. 54/2007 on the Implementation of Adopting a Child which explains that the adoptive parents-to-be have not married yet, and adopting a child by a single parent can only be done by an Indonesian citizen. Therefore, in their legal considerations, the judges have handed down the verdicts accurately.Keywords: Child Adoption, Indonesian Citizen, Foreign Citizen.
PENERAPAN DOKTRIN PIERCING THE CORPORATE VEIL DALAM PRAKTEK PERSEROAN TERBATAS DALAM PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG REPUBLIK INDONESIA (MARI), (STUDI PUTUSAN PERKARA NOMOR 1916K/PDT/1991 DAN NOMOR 1311K/PDT/2012) JEFFRY LEANDER
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 22 (2017): VOLUME 22 TAHUN 2017
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (277.266 KB)

Abstract

The main character of a limited liability company is that it is a legal subject which status is as a legal entity and liability is limited (limited liability) to the shareholders, members of board of directors and commissionairs i.e. as much as the shares they have in the company in accordance with the provisions in Article 3 paragraph (1) of the Law No.40/2007. However, in certain things, this liability is possibly eliminated by the principle of piercing the corporate veil. The research problems are how this Piercing the Corporate Veil is implemented in the laws and regulation concerning the limited liability companies in Indonesia, how this principle is regulated in relation with the board of directors of limited liability companies in Indonesia, and how the comparison of the Ruling of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia related to the Piercing the Corporate Veil Doctrine before the issuance of the Law No. 1/1995 until it was amended into the Law No.40/2007 on Limited Liability Companies between the Ruling of the Supreme Court for the Case No.1916 K/Pdt/1991 and 1311 K/Pdt/2012.Keyword: Piercing the Corporate Veil; limited liability; directors
ANALISIS HUKUM PERANAN PEJABAT PEMBUAT AKTA TANAH DALAM PEMUNGUTAN BEA PEROLEHAN HAK ATAS TANAH DAN BANGUNAN ATAS TRANSAKSI JUAL-BELI TANAH DAN BANGUNAN DI KABUPATEN HUMBANG HASUNDUTAN NOVITA DAMERIA MARBUN
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 22 (2017): VOLUME 22 TAHUN 2017
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (229.325 KB)

Abstract

The increase in the development in various fields triggers the need for land and buildings whereas they are very limited. Since land and buildings are very crucial for human life, it is natural if the acquistition of land and building is taxable with BPHTB (Duty on Land and Building Right Acquistion). The research problems were as follows: how about the regulation on BPHTB levying system on land and/or building transact, how about the regulation on the role of PPAT/Notary on BPHTB levying on land and building transact in Humbang Hasundutan Regency, and how about fulfilling the principle of justice in imposing sanction on PPAT in signing land and building transact with unpaid BPHTB in Humbang Hasundutan.Keywords: PPAT, BPHTB (Duty on Land and Building Right Acquisition), Transact
KEDUDUKAN ISTRI NON MUSLIM TERHADAP HARTA BERSAMA DAN HARTA PENINGGALAN SUAMI DALAM PERKAWINAN BEDA AGAMA (ANALISIS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 16K/AG/2010) RIZKI RIZKI
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 22 (2017): VOLUME 22 TAHUN 2017
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (450.886 KB)

Abstract

Based on Article 2, paragraph 1 of Law on Marriage, it is impossible to get married with a person who has different religion because religion itself prohibits a mixed marriage. However, the existence of the Jurisprudence of the Supreme Court No. 1400/K/Pdt/1986, a mixed marriage can be registered. The registration causes the wife has the right for joint property and her late husband’s property. MUI in their advice explain that granting property to a person who has different religion should be in the form of hibah (grant), last will and testament, and gift. The panel of judges’ consideration the Supreme Court’s Ruling No. 16/K/AG/2010 is that a mixed marriage is registered so that the wife has a part of joint property. On the other hand, there is a mistake in implementing wasiat wajibah in the dispute of inheritance, viewed from some jurisprudences; the giving of wasiat wajibah to a non-Muslim implies that the receiver has the same right as a Muslim heir which is contrary to the Islamic law and does not fulfill the sense of justice.Keywords: Mixed Marriage; Joint Property; Late Husband’s Property
KEWENANGAN PROSES PENYELIDIKAN DAN PENYIDIKAN PIHAK KEPOLISIAN TERHADAP NOTARIS SETELAH TERBITNYA UNDANG - UNDANG JABATAN NOTARIS NOMOR 2 TAHUN 2014 SARIYONO SARIYONO
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 22 (2017): VOLUME 22 TAHUN 2017
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (457.54 KB)

Abstract

The problem of the research was how about a deed drawn up by a Notary according to UUJN, it is duty of the Police to find out the truth about it. Therefore, the title of the research was “the Authority of the Process of Inquiry and Investigation by the Police on a Notary after the issuance of UUJN No. 2/2014, The conclusion of the research was that the authority of the Police in the process of inquiry and investigation on a Notary after the issuance of UUJN No. 2/2014 was that both parties should understand their own authority respectively according to Law. When a Notary has the problem with the deed, the Police can summon him as a witness/defendant. On the other hand, a Notary has the right of objection in the secrecy of his deed according to Article 4 in conjunction with Article 16 in conjunction with Article 54 of UUJN No. 2/2014. Meanwhile, based on Article 170, paragraph 1 of KUHAP and Article 1909, paragraph 2, fiqure 3e of KUHPerdata, the Police should understand the principle of presumed legality (Vermoedanvan Rechtmatigheid) or Presumption lustae Causa; in this case, a notarial deed should be considered legal until there is someone who claims that it is illegal, Here, the Police should state that it is legal until someone claims that it is legally defective, and the result of the research can be used for the next researches by the Police and a Notary; an MOU can be made between the Police management and the Indonesian Notarial Association.Keywords: Inquiry and Investigation, Police Force, Notary, UUJN No. 2/2014

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 8

 1 

Filter by Year

2017 2017


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 18 (2019): VOLUME 18 TAHUN 2019 Vol 17 (2019): VOLUME 17 TAHUN 2019 Vol 16 (2019): VOLUME 16 TAHUN 2019 Vol 15 (2019): VOLUME 15 TAHUN 2019 Vol 14 (2019): VOLUME 14 TAHUN 2019 Vol 13 (2019): VOLUME 13 TAHUN 2019 Vol 12 (2019): VOLUME 12 TAHUN 2019 Vol 11 (2019): VOLUME 11 TAHUN 2019 Vol 10 (2019): VOLUME 10 TAHUN 2019 Vol 9 (2019): VOLUME 9 TAHUN 2019 Vol 8 (2019): VOLUME 8 TAHUN 2019 Vol 7 (2019): VOLUME 7 TAHUN 2019 Vol 6 (2019): VOLUME 6 TAHUN 2019 Vol 5 (2019): VOLUME 5 TAHUN 2019 Vol 4 (2019): VOLUME 4 TAHUN 2019 Vol 3 (2019): VOLUME 3 TAHUN 2019 Vol 2 (2019): VOLUME 2 TAHUN 2019 Vol 1 (2019): VOLUME 1 TAHUN 2019 Vol 17 (2018): VOLUME 17 TAHUN 2018 Vol 16 (2018): VOLUME 16 TAHUN 2018 Vol 15 (2018): VOLUME 15 TAHUN 2018 Vol 14 (2018): VOLUME 14 TAHUN 2018 Vol 13 (2018): VOLUME 13 TAHUN 2018 Vol 12 (2018): VOLUME 12 TAHUN 2018 Vol 11 (2018): VOLUME 11 TAHUN 2018 Vol 10 (2018): VOLUME 10 TAHUN 2018 Vol 9 (2018): VOLUME 9 TAHUN 2018 Vol 8 (2018): VOLUME 8 TAHUN 2018 Vol 7 (2018): VOLUME 7 TAHUN 2018 Vol 6 (2018): VOLUME 6 TAHUN 2018 Vol 5 (2018): VOLUME 5 TAHUN 2018 Vol 4 (2018): VOLUME 4 TAHUN 2018 Vol 3 (2018): VOLUME 3 TAHUN 2018 Vol 2 (2018): VOLUME 2 TAHUN 2018 Vol 1 (2018): VOLUME 1 TAHUN 2018 Vol 24 (2017): VOLUME 24 TAHUN 2017 Vol 23 (2017): VOLUME 23 TAHUN 2017 Vol 22 (2017): VOLUME 22 TAHUN 2017 Vol 21 (2017): VOLUME 21 TAHUN 2017 Vol 20 (2017): VOLUME 20 TAHUN 2017 Vol 19 (2017): VOLUME 19 TAHUN 2017 Vol 18 (2017): VOLUME 18 TAHUN 2017 Vol 17 (2017): VOLUME 17 TAHUN 2017 Vol 16 (2017): VOLUME 16 TAHUN 2017 Vol 15 (2017): VOLUME 15 TAHUN 2017 Vol 14 (2017): VOLUME XIV TAHUN 2017 Vol 13 (2017): Volume XIII Tahun 2017 Vol 12 (2017): VOLUME XII TAHUN 2017 Vol 11 (2017): Volume XI Tahun 2017 Vol 10 (2017): VOLUME X TAHUN 2017 Vol 9 (2017): vol IX Tahun 2017 Vol 8 (2017): Volume VIII Tahun 2017 Vol 7 (2017): Volume VII Tahun 2017 Vol 6 (2017): VOLUME VI TAHUN 2017 Vol 5 (2017): VOLUME V TAHUN 2017 Vol 4 (2017): VOLUME IV TAHUN 2017 Vol 3 (2017): VOLUME III TAHUN 2017 Vol 2 (2017): VOLUME II TAHUN 2017 Vol 1 (2017): VOLUME I TAHUN 2017 Vol 21 (2016): VOLUME XXI TAHUN 2016 Vol 20 (2016): VOLUME XX TAHUN 2016 Vol 19 (2016): VOLUME XIX TAHUN 2016 Vol 18 (2016): VOLUME XVIII TAHUN 2016 Vol 17 (2016): VOLUME XVII TAHUN 2016 Vol 16 (2016): VOLUME XVI TAHUN 2016 Vol 15 (2016): VOLUME XV TAHUN 2016 Vol 14 (2016): VOLUME XIV TAHUN 2016 Vol 13 (2016): VOLUME XIII TAHUN 2016 Vol 12 (2016): VOLUME XII TAHUN 2016 Vol 11 (2016): VOLUME XI TAHUN 2016 Vol 10 (2016): VOLUME X TAHUN 2016 Vol 9 (2016): VOLUME IX TAHUN 2016 Vol 8 (2016): VOLUME VIII TAHUN 2016 Vol 7 (2016): VOLUME VII TAHUN 2016 Vol 6 (2016): VOLUME VI TAHUN 2016 Vol 5 (2016): Volume V Tahun 2016 Vol 4 (2016): Volume IV Tahun 2016 Vol 3 (2016): Volume III Tahun 2016 Vol 2 (2016): Volume II Tahun 2016 Vol 1 (2016): Volume I Tahun 2016 Vol 14 (2015): Volume XIV Tahun 2015 Vol 13 (2015): Volume XIII Tahun 2015 Vol 12 (2015): Volume XII Tahun 2015 Vol 11 (2015): Volume XI Tahun 2015 Vol 9 (2015): Volume IX Tahun 2015 Vol 8 (2015): Volume VIII Tahun 2015 Vol 7 (2015): Volume VII Tahun 2015 Vol 6 (2015): Volume VI Tahun 2015 Vol 5 (2015): Volume V Tahun 2015 Vol 4 (2015): Volume IV Tahun 2015 Vol 3 (2015): Volume III Tahun 2015 Vol 2 (2015): Volume II Tahun 2015 Vol 1 (2015): Volume I Tahun 2015 Vol 10 (2015) Vol 4: Volume 4 (2014) : Volume IV Tahun 2014 Vol 3 (2014): Volume III Tahun 2014 Vol 2 (2014) Vol 1: Volume I Tahun 2014 Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Volume II Tahun 2013 Vol 3: Volume III tahun 2013 Vol 1 (2013) More Issue