cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota medan,
Sumatera utara
INDONESIA
PREMISE LAW JURNAL
Published by Universitas Sumatera Utara
ISSN : -     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 7 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 3 (2019): VOLUME 3 TAHUN 2019" : 7 Documents clear
KEABSAHAN JUAL BELI YANG TANDA TANGANNYA DISANGKAL OLEH PENJUAL (Studi Kasus: Putusan No.48/Pdt.g/2014/PMS) FENDI WILLIAM
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 3 (2019): VOLUME 3 TAHUN 2019
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (278.909 KB)

Abstract

Dosen pembimbing:1.  Prof. Dr. Budiman Ginting, SH, MHum2.  Prof. Dr. Muhammad Yamin, SH, MS, CN3.  Dr. Edy Ikhsan, SH, MA The implementation of land transaction among the middle and lower class of people, either by cash or credit, is through buying and selling. Sales deed made in the office of Notary/PPAT has legal force as evidence since it is made according to law. However, the Notary takes liability for the persons appearing whose deeds are made. An authentic deed as strong evidence plays an important role in every legal case. Right and obligation which are clearly found in an authentic deed guarantees legal certainty and can avoid any dispute.The research used juridical normative which was library research with historical and legal provision approach about the liability of the persons appearing involved in making deeds in the PPAT office with witnesses who sign them.Based on the research done by the writer, he get knowledge about the power of a deed as evidence and how a PPAT who had submitted deed protocol for which the receiver of the deed protocol was involved in making the deed as evidence when the parties file complaint on PPAT’s deeds.Keywords: PPAT Deed, Evidence, the Parties’ Complaint
TANGGUNG JAWAB KANTOR PELAYANAN DAN KEKAYAAN NEGARA (KPKNL) ATAS OBJEK JAMINAN FIKTIF YANG DILELANG (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 696/PK/PDT/2012) IRA YULIA ALFIANI
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 3 (2019): VOLUME 3 TAHUN 2019
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (329.773 KB)

Abstract

Dosen Pembimbing:1.  Prof. Dr. Suhandi, SH, MH2.  Dr. Sutiarnoto, SH, MHum3.  Dr. Jelly Leviza, SH, MHum There are pros and cons in its process. One of them is an auction winner cannot have the object he has bought through the foreclosure sale since the object of the auction done by KPKNL is fictive. The research used juridical prescriptive analytic method. Secondary data were obtained from primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The data were gathered by conducting library research, documentary study, and interviews and analyzed qualitatively. The conclusion is that the fulfillment of the principles of auction on a fictive auctioned collateral for an auction winner, viewed from the perspective of the principles of auction, is not implemented properly. Nowadays, auction is only regulated repressively in its legal protection, but it is not regulated preventively in legal protection for an auction winner in the case of fictive auctioned collateral. The liability of KPKNL for a fictive auctioned object is only administrative.Keywords: KPKNL, Fictive Collateral
PELAKSANAAN THALAQ SECARA FIQIH ISLAM DI KECAMATAN PULAU RAKYAT KABUPATEN ASAHAN (DI TINJAU DARI UU NO.1 TAHUN 1974 TENTANG PERKAWINAN) ULUL AZMI UTAMI BUTAR-BUTAR
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 3 (2019): VOLUME 3 TAHUN 2019
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (564.283 KB)

Abstract

Dosen Pembimbing:1.  Prof. H.M. Hasballah Thaib, MA, PhD2.  Dr. Utary Maharany Barus, SH, Mhum3.  Dr. Yefrizawati, SH, MHum Thalaq (divorce) is halal even though God the Almighty does like it. When a husband says the word, “thalaq” to his wife, although it is said in joking or emotionally, it is officially done. The people in Pulau Rakyat Sub-district who are Moslems in majority have some problems with the implementation of the Marriage Law even though Law No. 1/1974 has been practiced since three decades ago. However, the problem of thalaq is not stipulated in Law on Marriage and its violation still exists. The research problems are how about the regulation on thalaq in the Islamic fiqh, why the people in Pulau Rakyat Sub-district do not do thalaq according to Law No. 1/1974 on Marriage, and how about the perception of Law No. 1/1974 on thalaq in the Islamic fiqh.Keywords: Thalaq, Islamic Fiqh, Law No. 1/1974
ANALISIS PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP MASYARAKAT TELUK JAKARTA UTARA AKIBAT REKLAMASI PULAU G (STUDI PUTUSAN MARI NOMOR: 92K/TUN/LH/2017 TENTANG PERIZINAN REKLAMASI) KARINA ISMI SABARINA SEMBIRING
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 3 (2019): VOLUME 3 TAHUN 2019
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1190.452 KB)

Abstract

Dosen Pembimbing:1.  Prof. Dr. Syafruddin Kalo, SH, Mhum2.  Prof. Dr. Muhammad Yamin, SH, MS, CN3.  Prof. Dr. Hasim Purba, SH, MHum Reclamation is the process of making new land from the bottom of the sea or river. The land that is reclaimed is called reclamation or landfill. In accordance with the Law, reclamation is defined as the activity that is done to increase the use of the land resources observed from enviromental and economical social views by means of land encirclement and drainage. In case the Government of DKI Jakarta Province wants to carry out reclamation of G Island to PT. Muara Wisesa, they have to prevent the rights of the people at Teluk Jakarta Utara form being violated. They also have to meet all the requirements for the license either from procedural or substancial licenses. Keywords: Reclamation, G Island, People at Teluk Jakarta Utara
ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP WARISAN YANG BELUM TERBAGI SEBAGAI SUBJEK PAJAK BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG PAJAK PENGHASILAN DIANA PUTRI TRISNA
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 3 (2019): VOLUME 3 TAHUN 2019
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (400.521 KB)

Abstract

Dosen Pembimbing:1. Dr. Suprayitno, SH, MKn2. Dr. Dedi Harianto, SH, MHum3. Dr. T. Keizerina Devi A, SH, CN, MHum According to Article2, paragraph 1, letter b of UU PPh (Law on IncomeTax), undistributed inheritance as a unit which substitutes heirs is called asubstitute Tax Subject. It is intended to impose PPh which comes from inheritanceby using testator’s NPWP (Taxpayer’s ID Number) deposited by the heir. Theresearch problems are how about why undistributed inheritanceis used as thesubject of PPh, how about the fulfillment of the principle of legal certainty indetermining undistributed inheritance as the subject of PPh, and how about theprinciple of justice in regulating undistributed inheritance for substituting testatoras the subject of PPh. The research used juridical normative and descriptiveanalytic method.Keywords: Income Tax, Undistributed Inheritance
SETTLEMENT OF INHERITANCE IN THE FORM OF LOAN CAUSED BY DEFAULT BY ONE OF THE HEIRS (A Case Study on the District Court’s Verdict No. 46/Pdt.G/2015/PN.Mdn) NURFIKA AFNI
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 3 (2019): VOLUME 3 TAHUN 2019
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (255.759 KB)

Abstract

Dosen Pembimbing:1. Prof. H.M. Hasballah, SH, MHum2. Dr. Utary Maharany Barus, SH, MHum3. Dr. Yefrizawati, SH, MHumInheritance law states that death causes inheritance. In consequence, allof a deceased person’s property will automatically goes down to the heirs.Usually, inheritance is distributed in cash; but in this case, the inheritance is inthe form of loan as it is stipulated in the Verdict No. 46/Pdt.G/2015/PN.Mdn.The thesis used juridical normative and descriptive analytic method.Secondary data were gathered by conducting library research and analyzedqualitatively, while the conclusion was drawn deductively.The result of the research shows that debt and credit among heirs towardinheritance collected physically or calculated before it can be distributed to heirs.Priority is given to zul furudl heir since his right is clearly described in the Koran.Some methods in settling loan inheritance due to one of the heirs’ default areSulhu, Ibra, and Hajr. In this case, sulhu is the most appropriate method insettling the dispute by negotiation to avoid prolonged dispute and to make thefamily tries between defendant and the plaintiff harmonious. The Panel of Judgesstate that the Deferndant is required to pay off his debts to the Plaintiff based onpromissory note ad since the Defendant does not have evidence which will stateon reverse.Keywords: Inheritance, Debt and Credit, Default, Heirs
SENGKETA KEPEMILIKAN TANAH SUGUHAN DI DESA SIGARA-GARA BERDASARKAN SK.GUBERNUR SUMUT NO: 16/BPPST/AGR/1961 (STUDI TERHADAP PUTUSAN MA. NO 3418 K/PDT/2015) NURLYNA SEMBIRING
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 3 (2019): VOLUME 3 TAHUN 2019
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (247.404 KB)

Abstract

Dosen Pembimbing:1. Prof. Dr. Muhammad Yamin, SH, MS, CN2. Prof. Dr. Syafruddin Kalo, SH, MHum3. Notaris Dr. Tony, SH, MKnLand is an element which cannot be separated from life since it is closelyrelated to human life in various fields. Land dispute causes disagreementamong people since each of them struggles for their interest. The object ofdispute is a piece of land granted by the Governor of North Sumatera at Sigaragaravillage with the letter No. 16/BPPST/Agr/1961. The research problems arehow about the enabling factors of land dispute on granted land ownershipbased on the Supreme Court’s Ruling No. 3418 K/Pdt/2015, how about itsvalidity based on the Directive of the Governor of North Sumatera No.16/BPPST/Agr/1961, and how about the judge’s consideration in the appealbased on the Supreme Court’s Ruling No. 3418 K/Pdt/2015.Keywords: Land Dispute, Granted Land, Plantation Land

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 7

 1 

Filter by Year

2019 2019


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 18 (2019): VOLUME 18 TAHUN 2019 Vol 17 (2019): VOLUME 17 TAHUN 2019 Vol 16 (2019): VOLUME 16 TAHUN 2019 Vol 15 (2019): VOLUME 15 TAHUN 2019 Vol 14 (2019): VOLUME 14 TAHUN 2019 Vol 13 (2019): VOLUME 13 TAHUN 2019 Vol 12 (2019): VOLUME 12 TAHUN 2019 Vol 11 (2019): VOLUME 11 TAHUN 2019 Vol 10 (2019): VOLUME 10 TAHUN 2019 Vol 9 (2019): VOLUME 9 TAHUN 2019 Vol 8 (2019): VOLUME 8 TAHUN 2019 Vol 7 (2019): VOLUME 7 TAHUN 2019 Vol 6 (2019): VOLUME 6 TAHUN 2019 Vol 5 (2019): VOLUME 5 TAHUN 2019 Vol 4 (2019): VOLUME 4 TAHUN 2019 Vol 3 (2019): VOLUME 3 TAHUN 2019 Vol 2 (2019): VOLUME 2 TAHUN 2019 Vol 1 (2019): VOLUME 1 TAHUN 2019 Vol 17 (2018): VOLUME 17 TAHUN 2018 Vol 16 (2018): VOLUME 16 TAHUN 2018 Vol 15 (2018): VOLUME 15 TAHUN 2018 Vol 14 (2018): VOLUME 14 TAHUN 2018 Vol 13 (2018): VOLUME 13 TAHUN 2018 Vol 12 (2018): VOLUME 12 TAHUN 2018 Vol 11 (2018): VOLUME 11 TAHUN 2018 Vol 10 (2018): VOLUME 10 TAHUN 2018 Vol 9 (2018): VOLUME 9 TAHUN 2018 Vol 8 (2018): VOLUME 8 TAHUN 2018 Vol 7 (2018): VOLUME 7 TAHUN 2018 Vol 6 (2018): VOLUME 6 TAHUN 2018 Vol 5 (2018): VOLUME 5 TAHUN 2018 Vol 4 (2018): VOLUME 4 TAHUN 2018 Vol 3 (2018): VOLUME 3 TAHUN 2018 Vol 2 (2018): VOLUME 2 TAHUN 2018 Vol 1 (2018): VOLUME 1 TAHUN 2018 Vol 24 (2017): VOLUME 24 TAHUN 2017 Vol 23 (2017): VOLUME 23 TAHUN 2017 Vol 22 (2017): VOLUME 22 TAHUN 2017 Vol 21 (2017): VOLUME 21 TAHUN 2017 Vol 20 (2017): VOLUME 20 TAHUN 2017 Vol 19 (2017): VOLUME 19 TAHUN 2017 Vol 18 (2017): VOLUME 18 TAHUN 2017 Vol 17 (2017): VOLUME 17 TAHUN 2017 Vol 16 (2017): VOLUME 16 TAHUN 2017 Vol 15 (2017): VOLUME 15 TAHUN 2017 Vol 14 (2017): VOLUME XIV TAHUN 2017 Vol 13 (2017): Volume XIII Tahun 2017 Vol 12 (2017): VOLUME XII TAHUN 2017 Vol 11 (2017): Volume XI Tahun 2017 Vol 10 (2017): VOLUME X TAHUN 2017 Vol 9 (2017): vol IX Tahun 2017 Vol 8 (2017): Volume VIII Tahun 2017 Vol 7 (2017): Volume VII Tahun 2017 Vol 6 (2017): VOLUME VI TAHUN 2017 Vol 5 (2017): VOLUME V TAHUN 2017 Vol 4 (2017): VOLUME IV TAHUN 2017 Vol 3 (2017): VOLUME III TAHUN 2017 Vol 2 (2017): VOLUME II TAHUN 2017 Vol 1 (2017): VOLUME I TAHUN 2017 Vol 21 (2016): VOLUME XXI TAHUN 2016 Vol 20 (2016): VOLUME XX TAHUN 2016 Vol 19 (2016): VOLUME XIX TAHUN 2016 Vol 18 (2016): VOLUME XVIII TAHUN 2016 Vol 17 (2016): VOLUME XVII TAHUN 2016 Vol 16 (2016): VOLUME XVI TAHUN 2016 Vol 15 (2016): VOLUME XV TAHUN 2016 Vol 14 (2016): VOLUME XIV TAHUN 2016 Vol 13 (2016): VOLUME XIII TAHUN 2016 Vol 12 (2016): VOLUME XII TAHUN 2016 Vol 11 (2016): VOLUME XI TAHUN 2016 Vol 10 (2016): VOLUME X TAHUN 2016 Vol 9 (2016): VOLUME IX TAHUN 2016 Vol 8 (2016): VOLUME VIII TAHUN 2016 Vol 7 (2016): VOLUME VII TAHUN 2016 Vol 6 (2016): VOLUME VI TAHUN 2016 Vol 5 (2016): Volume V Tahun 2016 Vol 4 (2016): Volume IV Tahun 2016 Vol 3 (2016): Volume III Tahun 2016 Vol 2 (2016): Volume II Tahun 2016 Vol 1 (2016): Volume I Tahun 2016 Vol 14 (2015): Volume XIV Tahun 2015 Vol 13 (2015): Volume XIII Tahun 2015 Vol 12 (2015): Volume XII Tahun 2015 Vol 11 (2015): Volume XI Tahun 2015 Vol 9 (2015): Volume IX Tahun 2015 Vol 8 (2015): Volume VIII Tahun 2015 Vol 7 (2015): Volume VII Tahun 2015 Vol 6 (2015): Volume VI Tahun 2015 Vol 5 (2015): Volume V Tahun 2015 Vol 4 (2015): Volume IV Tahun 2015 Vol 3 (2015): Volume III Tahun 2015 Vol 2 (2015): Volume II Tahun 2015 Vol 1 (2015): Volume I Tahun 2015 Vol 10 (2015) Vol 4: Volume 4 (2014) : Volume IV Tahun 2014 Vol 3 (2014): Volume III Tahun 2014 Vol 2 (2014) Vol 1: Volume I Tahun 2014 Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Volume II Tahun 2013 Vol 3: Volume III tahun 2013 Vol 1 (2013) More Issue